12.07.2015 Views

The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

135 Respon- If education <strong>in</strong>volves teach<strong>in</strong>g children particular skills andsive <strong>in</strong>formation, it also <strong>in</strong>volves help<strong>in</strong>g them to <strong>in</strong>vestigate andevaluation understand ideas and values. It means meet<strong>in</strong>g commonneeds as well as develop<strong>in</strong>g unique abilities. Eliot Eisner(1969) dist<strong>in</strong>guishes between two ma<strong>in</strong> types of educationalobjectives — <strong>in</strong>structional and expressive — both hav<strong>in</strong>g animportant place <strong>in</strong> schools. An <strong>in</strong>structional objective is onewhich specifies skills and <strong>in</strong>formation to be learnt. Anexpressive objective does not specify what children are tolearn. It def<strong>in</strong>es a task <strong>in</strong> which they are to engage, or asituation <strong>in</strong> which they are to work. An expressive objective'provides both the teacher and the student with an <strong>in</strong>vitationto explore, defer or focus on issues that are of peculiar<strong>in</strong>terest or import.' All curriculum activities, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g thearts, <strong>in</strong>volve both types of objective. Learn<strong>in</strong>g to master thegrammar and syntax of a language, for example, and us<strong>in</strong>gthe language to explore and express ideas are both importantactivities for the child. <strong>The</strong>y may be closely related <strong>in</strong> practice,each grow<strong>in</strong>g naturally from and <strong>in</strong>to the other. But theyimply different types of objective and different approachesto, and criteria for, evaluation. Methods of evaluation shouldbe sensitive to different types of work and to the variety ofeducational outcomes which result.136 Pervasive Michael Scriven (1967) makes a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between formativeassessment and summative evaluations. Formative evaluations are thosewhich teachers make dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of their work andwhich <strong>in</strong>fluence the direction the work takes. <strong>The</strong>y arediagnostic. Summative evaluations reflect upon the effectsof what has been done. This is not a difference based onwhen the evaluation takes place but on the reason for do<strong>in</strong>git. Similarly, assessments of pupils may be used to decideon the course their work is to take, or to summarise theirachievements. Feedback and encouragement are key elements<strong>in</strong> education. Provid<strong>in</strong>g these should be a function of assessment.This should pervade the process of their education andbe as familiar to pupils as their lessons. This implies someth<strong>in</strong>gmuch broader and more <strong>in</strong>tegral to the work thanperiodic test<strong>in</strong>g and grad<strong>in</strong>g.137 Inform- Assessment should provide as much <strong>in</strong>formation as possible.ative <strong>The</strong>re is a tendency to give assessments <strong>in</strong> the form of grades,assessment marks or percentages. One reason for this is to make themseem objective. Another is to facilitate comparisons betweenpupils. We have four reasons for doubt<strong>in</strong>g the value of suchprocedures, particularly <strong>in</strong> the arts.84a Only very limited aspects of educational atta<strong>in</strong>ment

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!