The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation The Arts in Schools - Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

gulbenkian.org.uk
from gulbenkian.org.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Teachers and pupils alike need information on each other'sactivities and perceptions if their work together is to advance.Assessment and evaluation should provide this as a basis forinformed description and intelligent judgement. In discussingassessment and evaluation, therefore, we are considering tworelated processes within the daily activity of education.132 Examin- Examinations are highly structured instruments of assessmentation which are intended to test specific knowledge and abilities atparticular points in pupils' development. An importantfeature of examinations — to which we will return — is thatthey are used often to rate pupils according to a comparativescale of achievement. Although the call for accountability ineducation can only be answered by a rigorous approach inthe schools to assessment and evaluation, examinations neednot be the chief means of this. Accountability and examinabilityare not the same thing.133 What In Chapter 5 we argued the need for schools to have ankind of overall policy related to their catchment area, age range andassessment so on. Both the general and the particular aspects of thatand account- policy should be reflected in the pattern of the curriculumability? and expressed in the work of the various departments. Ifpolicies and principles throughout a school curriculum needto be co-ordinated, they also need to be open to revision andreformation in the face of fresh information, new experienceand changing circumstances. This has implications for themethods of evaluation and assessment. It means that to beuseful, evaluation should be illuminative and responsive;while assessment should be pervasive and informative.134 Illumin- Schools and teachers should look for the actual effects ofative their teaching on children. The emphasis is important.evaluation Evaluation is not simply a matter of checking on whetherpre-specified aims and objectives have been achieved. Thismay well apply to industrial or commercial processes where adirect relationship between aims and outcomes is importantto maintain — and easy to corroborate. Education is ratherdifferent. Although teachers and schools must have clear aimsand objectives, these are often modified as the work progresses.Many social processes follow this principle. Tying a coursetoo closely to pre-specified objectives can stifle the flexibilityand responsiveness on which good teaching depends. Evaluationshould aim to illuminate all aspects of the work.This includes reviewing and reflecting on the original aims andobjectives and possibly reformulating them as the work goeson.83

135 Respon- If education involves teaching children particular skills andsive information, it also involves helping them to investigate andevaluation understand ideas and values. It means meeting commonneeds as well as developing unique abilities. Eliot Eisner(1969) distinguishes between two main types of educationalobjectives — instructional and expressive — both having animportant place in schools. An instructional objective is onewhich specifies skills and information to be learnt. Anexpressive objective does not specify what children are tolearn. It defines a task in which they are to engage, or asituation in which they are to work. An expressive objective'provides both the teacher and the student with an invitationto explore, defer or focus on issues that are of peculiarinterest or import.' All curriculum activities, including thearts, involve both types of objective. Learning to master thegrammar and syntax of a language, for example, and usingthe language to explore and express ideas are both importantactivities for the child. They may be closely related in practice,each growing naturally from and into the other. But theyimply different types of objective and different approachesto, and criteria for, evaluation. Methods of evaluation shouldbe sensitive to different types of work and to the variety ofeducational outcomes which result.136 Pervasive Michael Scriven (1967) makes a distinction between formativeassessment and summative evaluations. Formative evaluations are thosewhich teachers make during the course of their work andwhich influence the direction the work takes. They arediagnostic. Summative evaluations reflect upon the effectsof what has been done. This is not a difference based onwhen the evaluation takes place but on the reason for doingit. Similarly, assessments of pupils may be used to decideon the course their work is to take, or to summarise theirachievements. Feedback and encouragement are key elementsin education. Providing these should be a function of assessment.This should pervade the process of their education andbe as familiar to pupils as their lessons. This implies somethingmuch broader and more integral to the work thanperiodic testing and grading.137 Inform- Assessment should provide as much information as possible.ative There is a tendency to give assessments in the form of grades,assessment marks or percentages. One reason for this is to make themseem objective. Another is to facilitate comparisons betweenpupils. We have four reasons for doubting the value of suchprocedures, particularly in the arts.84a Only very limited aspects of educational attainment

Teachers and pupils alike need <strong>in</strong>formation on each other'sactivities and perceptions if their work together is to advance.Assessment and evaluation should provide this as a basis for<strong>in</strong>formed description and <strong>in</strong>telligent judgement. In discuss<strong>in</strong>gassessment and evaluation, therefore, we are consider<strong>in</strong>g tworelated processes with<strong>in</strong> the daily activity of education.132 Exam<strong>in</strong>- Exam<strong>in</strong>ations are highly structured <strong>in</strong>struments of assessmentation which are <strong>in</strong>tended to test specific knowledge and abilities atparticular po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> pupils' development. An importantfeature of exam<strong>in</strong>ations — to which we will return — is thatthey are used often to rate pupils accord<strong>in</strong>g to a comparativescale of achievement. Although the call for accountability <strong>in</strong>education can only be answered by a rigorous approach <strong>in</strong>the schools to assessment and evaluation, exam<strong>in</strong>ations neednot be the chief means of this. Accountability and exam<strong>in</strong>abilityare not the same th<strong>in</strong>g.133 What In Chapter 5 we argued the need for schools to have ank<strong>in</strong>d of overall policy related to their catchment area, age range andassessment so on. Both the general and the particular aspects of thatand account- policy should be reflected <strong>in</strong> the pattern of the curriculumability? and expressed <strong>in</strong> the work of the various departments. Ifpolicies and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples throughout a school curriculum needto be co-ord<strong>in</strong>ated, they also need to be open to revision andreformation <strong>in</strong> the face of fresh <strong>in</strong>formation, new experienceand chang<strong>in</strong>g circumstances. This has implications for themethods of evaluation and assessment. It means that to beuseful, evaluation should be illum<strong>in</strong>ative and responsive;while assessment should be pervasive and <strong>in</strong>formative.134 Illum<strong>in</strong>- <strong>Schools</strong> and teachers should look for the actual effects ofative their teach<strong>in</strong>g on children. <strong>The</strong> emphasis is important.evaluation Evaluation is not simply a matter of check<strong>in</strong>g on whetherpre-specified aims and objectives have been achieved. Thismay well apply to <strong>in</strong>dustrial or commercial processes where adirect relationship between aims and outcomes is importantto ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> — and easy to corroborate. Education is ratherdifferent. Although teachers and schools must have clear aimsand objectives, these are often modified as the work progresses.Many social processes follow this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple. Ty<strong>in</strong>g a coursetoo closely to pre-specified objectives can stifle the flexibilityand responsiveness on which good teach<strong>in</strong>g depends. Evaluationshould aim to illum<strong>in</strong>ate all aspects of the work.This <strong>in</strong>cludes review<strong>in</strong>g and reflect<strong>in</strong>g on the orig<strong>in</strong>al aims andobjectives and possibly reformulat<strong>in</strong>g them as the work goeson.83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!