ACTA UNIVERSITATIS PALACKIANAE OLOMUCENSIS GYMNICA ...

74 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn. 2004, vol. 34, no. 2Fig. 3Percentage of regulating activities level among students of the University School of Physical Education in Wrocław50454035302520151050no low medium highgroup Igroup IIFig. 4Percentage of motor learning effectiveness level among the students of University School of Physical Education inWrocław6050403020group Igroup II100low medium highwhere computer-aided motor learning was employed,learning effects were assessed on the basis of the levelof mastering a new motor task as well as by the levelof regulating activities. Group I followed the programwhich aimed at learning through programming of motorrepresentation, whereas group II through self-regulationof the representation. The executive control related tothe whole execution (execution by wholes) of activitiesprovided new information which again supported regulatingactivities of the motor representation.Within the group of students programming motorrepresentation a low level of these activities (47.82% ofthe examined) or lack of such activities (26.09%) prevails.Only 35% of the examined learners executed regulationprogramming activities at a higher level: 17.39%at a medium level and 8.70% at a high level.The situation was different in the group of examinedlearners who used motor representation ina self-regulating skills developing program. Almost halfof the examined learners reached a high level (46.80%),similarly to a medium level (42.56% of the examined).Approximately 10% of the examined learners did notprogram any self-regulating activities (low level 6.38%and 4.26% none) (Fig. 3).