10 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn. 2004, vol. 34, no. 2TABLE 3Burnout of physical training teachers – the statistical analysis of dimensions from the Maslach Burnout Inventory(MBI) within particular clusters (emotional exhaustion EE, negative sense of professional achievement NSPA, depersonalizationDP)MBI I. II.ClusterIII. IV. V. Totalx– SD – x SD – x SD – x SD – x SD – x SDEE 8.9 5.39 53.0 – 8.2 3.81 21.5 2.17 21.7 6.68 12.7 8.45NSPA 6.8 4.29 34.0 – 18.7 5.41 10.7 5.82 16.6 6.54 11.0 7.34DP 2.9 2.97 18.0 – 3.7 2.81 12.2 5.04 5.9 4.30 4.1 3.93TABLE 4Cluster description: gender, age and duration of employment among physical training teachersClusterFemalesGender Age Duration ofemploymentMalesN % N % x – SD x – SDI. 79 52.7 71 47.3 36.2 2.97 12.4 8.10II. 0 0 1 100 50.0 – 25.0 –III. 16 53.5 14 46.7 38.8 8.54 14.2 8.46IV. 4 66.7 2 33.3 33.0 7.18 7.3 4.84V. 45 65.2 24 34.8 37.5 7.82 12.9 7.50Total 144 100 112 100 36.9 7.86 12.7 7.97Subsequent statistical analyses allowed for definingfive clusters in the studied population (TABLE 2). Theclusters were homogenous with respect to burnout leveland they grouped individuals characterized by the sameburnout pattern, i.e. with similar values of the three dimensions:emotional exhaustion (EE), negative sense ofprofessional achievement (NSPA) and depersonalization(DP) (TABLE 3–4). In view of the fact that the burnoutprocess in female (N = 144) and male physical trainingteachers (N = 112) was similar (ANOVA, F = 0.881,p > 0.05), the variable of gender was disregarded infurther analyses.Among the respondents, 58.6% were found not tobe burned out (Cluster I; N = 150) (TABLE 2–3, Fig.1). Working with children was a clear source of satisfactionto this group of educators – their mean value ofthe negative sense of professional achievement dimension(x – I. NSPA = 6.8) was almost twice as low as themean value for the entire population (x – NSPA = 11.0).Characterized by a relatively low degree of burnout,these teachers were capable of maintaining the closestcontacts with their pupils – the mean value of the depersonalizationdimension DP (x – I. DP = 2.9) was thelowest in this cluster (TABLE 3).Clusters II and V (N = 70) grouped burned-outteachers (27.4%), who experienced symptoms of emotionalexhaustion and depersonalization, while clearlyderiving no satisfaction from their work. In the remainingteachers – Cluster III and IV (N = 36; 14.0%) theburnout syndrome was beginning to manifest itself indiverse ways (TABLE 2–3).Cluster II was a one-element cluster (TABLE2–4). Very high values of the three MBI dimensions:EE = 53.0, NSPA = 34.0 and DP = 18.0, proved a veryhigh, outright extreme burnout level in one respondent,a male teacher of a junior high school employed for 25years (Fig. 2).The population of physical education teachersgrouped in Cluster V was also characterized by highmean values of the triad of factors that together formedthe phenomenon of burnout. Considerable emotionalexhaustion was clearly seen (x – V.EE = 21.7) (TABLE 3).
Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn. 2004, vol. 34, no. 2 11Fig. 1Graphic presentation of three burnout dimensions in Cluster I. N = 150 (emotional exhaustion EE, negative sense ofprofessional achievement NSPA, depersonalization DP)6050403020x cluster Ix total100EE NSPA DPFig. 2A graphic presentation of three burnout dimensions in Cluster II. N = 1 (emotional exhaustion EE, negative sense ofprofessional achievement NSPA, depersonalization DP)6050403020x cluster IIx total100EE NSPA DPFig. 3Graphic presentation of three burnout dimension in Cluster V. N = 69 (emotional exhaustion EE, negative sense ofprofessional achievement NSPA, depersonalization DP)6050403020x cluster Vx total100EE NSPA DP
- Page 1 and 2: ACTAUNIVERSITATIS PALACKIANAE OLOMU
- Page 3 and 4: ACTAUNIVERSITATIS PALACKIANAE OLOMU
- Page 5: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 8 and 9: 8 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn
- Page 12 and 13: 12 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 14: 14 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 17: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 20 and 21: 20 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 22: 22 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 26 and 27: 26 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 28 and 29: 28 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 32 and 33: 32 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 34 and 35: 34 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 36 and 37: 36 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 38 and 39: 38 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 40 and 41: 40 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 43 and 44: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 45 and 46: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 47 and 48: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 49 and 50: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 51 and 52: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 53 and 54: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 55 and 56: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 57 and 58: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 59: Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gymn.
- Page 62 and 63:
62 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 64 and 65:
64 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 66 and 67:
66 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 68 and 69:
68 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 70 and 71:
70 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 72 and 73:
72 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 74 and 75:
74 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 76 and 77:
76 Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc., Gym
- Page 78 and 79:
ACTAUNIVERSITATIS PALACKIANAE OLOMU