12.07.2015 Views

geothermal power plant projects in central america - Orkustofnun

geothermal power plant projects in central america - Orkustofnun

geothermal power plant projects in central america - Orkustofnun

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mass flow rate (kg/s) on the <strong>plant</strong> size (kW) for the SF, DF and ORC <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong>s. The sizedeterm<strong>in</strong>es the cost of various components such as the turb<strong>in</strong>e and heat exchangers which are themajor components reflected <strong>in</strong> the purchas<strong>in</strong>g costs of the ma<strong>in</strong> equipment of ORC, SF and DF <strong>power</strong><strong>plant</strong>s. An <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the <strong>geothermal</strong> resource temperature results <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the efficiency ofthe <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong> and a decrease <strong>in</strong> the specific cost of equipment. This characteristic is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure31 where the specific PEC has an <strong>in</strong>verse relationship with the resource temperature and the mass flowrate.The temperature of the <strong>geothermal</strong> resource also affects the selection of the <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong> technology.The ORC has the advantage over flash cycles when used for <strong>power</strong> production from low-temperatureresources. In the economic evaluation of the purchase costs of ma<strong>in</strong> equipment as a function of theresource temperature, it can be seen (Figure 31) that the specific PEC of ORC for temperatures below180°C is lower than that of SF and DF. However, the specific PEC of ORC rises as temperature drops.From the same <strong>geothermal</strong> fluid flow rate, as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 24, the DF cycle can generate more<strong>power</strong> than the SF cycle but at an overall <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> cost because of the extra equipment. However,the specific PEC for DF can be lower than for SF for the same fluid rate and higher temperatureresources, and for the same temperature resource and higher mass flow rate, which is also associatedwith <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong> size. DF <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong>s present lower specific PEC than SF for a resource temperatureabove: 220°C for a mass flow rate of 300 kg/s; 200°C for a mass flow rate of 600 kg/s; 180°C for amass flow rate of 1000 kg/s.5.4.11 Equipment and constructionThe estimation of the total equipment and construction cost is based on the purchase of the ma<strong>in</strong>equipment cost which was calculated <strong>in</strong> the last section. The factor method proposed by Bejan et al.(1996) calculates the cost components of the fixed capital <strong>in</strong> terms of a percentage of the purchaseequipment cost (% of PEC) and direct cost (% of DC). Table 9 shows the calculation of equipment andconstruction costs.TABLE 9: Estimation of equipment and construction cost <strong>in</strong> terms of PEC and DCEquipment and costruction cost estimationPurchase equipment cost (PEC)Installation of ma<strong>in</strong> equipmentPip<strong>in</strong>gControl and <strong>in</strong>strumentationElectrical equipment and materialsLandEng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and supervisorTotal direct cost (DC)Constructions costTotal% factor33% of PEC10% of PEC12% of PEC13% of PEC10% of PEC25% of PEC15% of DC5.4.12 Steam gather<strong>in</strong>gThe connection between the wells, the separation station and the <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong> network is def<strong>in</strong>ed as thesteam gather<strong>in</strong>g system or steam field pip<strong>in</strong>g. The cost of steam field pip<strong>in</strong>g typically depends on thedistance from the wells to the <strong>power</strong> house, the flow<strong>in</strong>g pressure and the chemistry of the fluids.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Hance (2005), valves, <strong>in</strong>strumentation, control and data acquisition must be <strong>in</strong>cludedbecause they can be significant; the pip<strong>in</strong>g and controls can vary from 111 to 279 USD/kW. Us<strong>in</strong>g2010 USD, the estimated cost USD/kW has been <strong>in</strong>flated accord<strong>in</strong>g to the US BLS (2011) <strong>in</strong>flationcalculator.35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!