egional reconnaissance <strong>in</strong> 1981identified 13 <strong>geothermal</strong> areas,of which 7 areas were selectedwith temperatures from 230 to300°C. Listed <strong>in</strong> order ofdecreas<strong>in</strong>g priority they are:Amatitlán, Tecuamburro, ZunilI, Zunil II, San Marcos,Moyuta, and Totonicapán.Second priority areas with lowtemperatureresources are: LosAchiotes, Palencia, Retana,Ayarza, Atitlán, Motagua andIpala.3.1.2 El SalvadorEl Salvador is the largestproducer of <strong>geothermal</strong> energy<strong>in</strong> Central America (by year2010); the <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong>s Ahuachapán (95 MW) and Berlín (109.4 MW) supply approximately 25% ofEl Salvador’s electricity.Herrera et al. (2010) reported the temperatures of <strong>geothermal</strong> resources as be<strong>in</strong>g 250°C <strong>in</strong>Ahuachapán, 300°C <strong>in</strong> Berlín, 230°C <strong>in</strong> San Vicente, 240°C <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ameca, and there are severalresources below 200°C all along the volcanic cha<strong>in</strong>. Depths range from as little as 600 m <strong>in</strong> theshallow areas of Ahuachapán, to about 2,800 m <strong>in</strong> the deep parts of Berlín. Pull<strong>in</strong>ger (2009) reportedthat another area with a possible high enthalpy resource is the Coatepeque <strong>geothermal</strong> field, where an<strong>in</strong>itial pre-feasibility study <strong>in</strong> the mid 1990s identified a possible resource with temperatures of around220°C. Medium enthalpy resources such as Conchagua, Chilanguera and Obrajuelo geological,geochemical and geophysical field studies have identified resources with estimated temperatures of180 to 220°C.3.1.3 HondurasPlatanares is the only <strong>geothermal</strong> project under development <strong>in</strong> Honduras where performed studiesshowed that a potential of 35 MW could be achieved. Pavana and Azacualpa <strong>projects</strong> are under study.Lagos and Gomez (2010) reported that, <strong>in</strong> the evaluation of Platanares, higher temperatures between160 and 165°C were found at shallow depths and geothermometers suggested resource temperatures ofbetween 200 and 225°C. Updated studies show a potential of 23 MW <strong>in</strong> Azacualpa with temperaturesbetween 170 and 180°C, and 18 MW <strong>in</strong> Pavana with temperatures between 140° and 150°C. The ma<strong>in</strong><strong>geothermal</strong> areas identified dur<strong>in</strong>g the surface exploration <strong>in</strong> the 1970s are Platanares, San Ignacio,Azacualpa, Sambo Creek, Pavana, El Olivar and El Tigre Island.3.1.4 NicaraguaMW2000180016001400120010008006004002000Costa RicaFIGURE 2: Central America: Installed <strong>geothermal</strong> electricitygeneration capacity (CEPAL, 2010) vs. most probable <strong>geothermal</strong>potential (Lippmann, 2006)The Momotombo <strong>plant</strong> has 70 MW of <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity; however, there have been decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> theoutput levels. In year 2010, INE reported that the <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity available was 26.5 MW. SanJac<strong>in</strong>to Tizate (<strong>in</strong> year 2011) was operat<strong>in</strong>g at 10 MW and is under a two phase 72 MW expansion.In Momotombo, more than 44 exploration wells have been drilled (up to 2,500 m <strong>in</strong> depth),encounter<strong>in</strong>g temperatures <strong>in</strong> excess of 330°C (Mostert, 2007). Pull<strong>in</strong>ger (2009) reported that <strong>in</strong> SanJac<strong>in</strong>to Tizate <strong>geothermal</strong> area, several wells were drilled (up to 2,200 m <strong>in</strong> depth) and confirmed theexistence of temperatures from 260 to 290°C; and <strong>in</strong> El Hoyo Monte Galán <strong>geothermal</strong> area,temperatures of 220°C (at 2,000 m) were identified. Zúñiga (2005) po<strong>in</strong>ted out that there were morepromis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>geothermal</strong> areas: Managua-Chiltepe and Masaya-Granada-Nandaime. Other areas withEl SalvadorInstalled CapacityGuatemalaPotentialHondurasNicaraguaPanamá13
possible high enthalpy resources mentioned <strong>in</strong> Nicaragua´s Geothermal Master Plan (CNE, 2001) areCasita-San Cristobal volcano and Concepción volcano on the island of Ometepe.3.1.5 Costa RicaAccord<strong>in</strong>g to Projekt Consult GmbH and Loy D. (2007), the potential <strong>geothermal</strong> <strong>power</strong> <strong>in</strong> Costa Ricais estimated by some sources to be as high as 900 MW; nevertheless, ICE assumes a potential of only235MW, as its analysis takes <strong>in</strong>to account certa<strong>in</strong> restrictive factors (large numbers of the suitable sitesare located <strong>in</strong> national parks and the operation of such facilities at these locations is prohibited bylaw).Miravalles (165.5 MW) is the first operational <strong>geothermal</strong> <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong> <strong>in</strong> Costa Rica s<strong>in</strong>ce 1994. LasPailas (35 MW) <strong>geothermal</strong> <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong>, located at the R<strong>in</strong>cón de La Vieja Volcano, started <strong>in</strong> 2011.Miravalles <strong>geothermal</strong> field presents a water dom<strong>in</strong>ated reservoir with an average temperature of240°C. Las Pailas <strong>geothermal</strong> field, dur<strong>in</strong>g feasibility studies, confirmed the existence of a <strong>geothermal</strong>reservoir with temperatures near 260°C (Protti, 2010).Fung (2008) reported a <strong>geothermal</strong> area under feasibility studies at Bor<strong>in</strong>quen where a production wellwas drilled with the highest measured bottom hole temperature (275°C) <strong>in</strong> Costa Rica. Tenorio andNuevo Mundo <strong>geothermal</strong> areas are under pre-feasibility studies; Pocosol and the northern part of theR<strong>in</strong>cón de la Vieja volcano are under reconnaissance studies. In Pocosol, geothermometers suggesteda reservoir temperature of 183-217°C. Other potential <strong>geothermal</strong> areas identified around thevolcanoes are Platanar, Poás, Barva, Irazú and Turrialba.3.1.6 PanamaThe potential for <strong>geothermal</strong> <strong>power</strong> <strong>in</strong> Panama has been studied on several occasions s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1970s,and five ma<strong>in</strong> areas for potential <strong>geothermal</strong> <strong>power</strong> generation have been evaluated s<strong>in</strong>ce: Barú-Colorado, Valle de Antón, Coiba Island, Tonosí and Chitre de Calobre. The different studies varied <strong>in</strong>conclusions, plac<strong>in</strong>g the entire <strong>geothermal</strong> potential for Panama between 100 MW and 450 MW(Giard<strong>in</strong>ella et al., 2011). In August 2006, the firm West Japan Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Consultants, Inc., <strong>in</strong> theframework of the Puebla-Panama Plan, presented the most recent prelim<strong>in</strong>ary estimate of the<strong>geothermal</strong> potential of Panama for the Baru-Colorado area as 24 MW, and for the Valle de Antonarea 18 MW (ETESA, 2011).TABLE 2: Central American <strong>geothermal</strong> <strong>power</strong> <strong>plant</strong>s <strong>in</strong> 2011CountryEl SalvadorGuatemalaCosta RicaNicaraguaPower Plant NameType ofUnitTotalInstalledCapacityMWAhuachapan Unit 1-2 S<strong>in</strong>gle Flash 30.0Ahuachapan Unit 3 Double Flash 35.0Berl<strong>in</strong> Unit 1-2 S<strong>in</strong>gle Flash 28.0Berl<strong>in</strong> Unit 3 S<strong>in</strong>gle Flash 44.0Berl<strong>in</strong> Unit 4 B<strong>in</strong>ary 9.4Orzunil Unit 1-7 B<strong>in</strong>ary 24.0Ortitlan Unit 1 B<strong>in</strong>ary 25.2Miravalles Unit 1-2 S<strong>in</strong>gle Flash 55.0Miravalles Unit 3 S<strong>in</strong>gle Flash 29.5Miravalles Unit 5 B<strong>in</strong>ary 21.0Miravalles WHU 1 BackPressure 5.0Pailas Pailas I B<strong>in</strong>ary 41.0Momotombo Unit 1-2 S<strong>in</strong>gle Flash 35.0Momotombo Unit 3 B<strong>in</strong>ary 7.5San Jac<strong>in</strong>to Tizate Unit 1-2 BackPressure 5.014
- Page 1 and 2: GEOTHERMAL TRAINING PROGRAMMEHot sp
- Page 3 and 4: This MSc thesis has also been publi
- Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSMy gratitude to the
- Page 7 and 8: TABLE OF CONTENTSPage1. INTRODUCTIO
- Page 9 and 10: PageAPPENDIX A: FINANCIAL MODEL ...
- Page 12 and 13: 1. INTRODUCTIONRecent research on r
- Page 14 and 15: 2. CENTRAL AMERICAN DATA2.1 Power p
- Page 16 and 17: 2.2.3 HondurasThe Honduran electric
- Page 18 and 19: NET INJECTION BY SOURCE (2010)INSTA
- Page 20 and 21: income taxes for a period of 10 yea
- Page 22 and 23: annual temperature ranges from 17 t
- Page 26 and 27: 4. GEOTHERMAL ELECTRICAL POWER ASSE
- Page 28 and 29: The net contribution of that power
- Page 30 and 31: Introducing , = , and , = ,
- Page 32 and 33: 9ProductionWellBoiler5Turbine~1046P
- Page 34 and 35: TABLE 3: Parameters and boundary co
- Page 36 and 37: eaches the maximum limit, and for h
- Page 38 and 39: 160180140160tc vap[i], th vap[i]120
- Page 40 and 41: average results, and combining them
- Page 42 and 43: The base cost ( ) can be calculate
- Page 44 and 45: calculation for another separator c
- Page 46 and 47: mass flow rate (kg/s) on the plant
- Page 48 and 49: Table 11 shows a summary of costs f
- Page 50 and 51: 5.6.4 Comparison of capital costs b
- Page 52 and 53: 6. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT
- Page 54 and 55: 6.2 Model structureThe financial fe
- Page 56 and 57: CCF = EBITDA − ∆Working Capital
- Page 58 and 59: Interest on loansFleischmann (2007)
- Page 60 and 61: IRR30%25%IRR CapitalIRR Equity20%Si
- Page 62 and 63: FIGURE 42: Allocation of funds for:
- Page 64 and 65: 340IRR Free Cash Flow to Equity [ %
- Page 66 and 67: flash technology is between 0.3 and
- Page 68 and 69: Energy Price Availability Factor O&
- Page 70 and 71: FIGURE 50: Density and cumulative p
- Page 72 and 73: In Chapter 6, Figure 44 illustrated
- Page 74 and 75:
The internal rate of return is offs
- Page 76 and 77:
Cengel, Y. and Tuner, R., 2005: Fun
- Page 78 and 79:
IEAb, 2011: Technology roadmap: Geo
- Page 80 and 81:
Salmon, J., Meurice, J., Wobus, N.,
- Page 82 and 83:
APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL MO
- Page 84 and 85:
APPENDIX C: INVESTMENT AND FINANCIN
- Page 86 and 87:
APPENDIX E: BALANCE SHEETBALANCE SH