2.2.3 HondurasThe Honduran electricity market susta<strong>in</strong>s itself via the electric law approved <strong>in</strong> 1994. It promotescompetition <strong>in</strong> the wholesale market of median energy by the separation of generation, transmissionand distribution, and the supply of electricity services by private agents. However, accord<strong>in</strong>g to theconsult<strong>in</strong>g firm Pampagrass (2009), ENEE (Empresa Nacional de Energía Eléctrica) converted itself<strong>in</strong>to the only buyer for the entire system and kept its dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g presence <strong>in</strong> the sector. Theopportunity market is very marg<strong>in</strong>al even though legislation gives them options to participate;<strong>in</strong>dependent commercial agents and the activity of larger consumers are marg<strong>in</strong>al.NET INJECTION BY SOURCE (2010)INSTALLED ELECTRICITY GENERATION CAPACITY (1990 - 2010)Thermal3,641.6 GWh54.0%Imports22.1 GWh0.3 %Hydro3,080.2 GWh45.7 %MW1,8001,6001,4001,2001,0008006004002000HydroThermal1990199520002004200520062007200820092010FIGURE 4: Honduras: Net <strong>in</strong>jection by source <strong>in</strong> 2010;<strong>in</strong>stalled electricity generation capacity 1990-2010In 2010, the total <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity across all available resource types <strong>in</strong> Honduras was 1,610.4 MWand peak demand was 1,245.0 MW. Thermal had the largest <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity 67.3% andhydroelectric 32.7%. Figure 4 shows that, <strong>in</strong> terms of evolution, <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity has almost tripled<strong>in</strong> the last 20 years. Yearly demand was 6,743.9 GWh, generated from 54% thermal, 45.7% hydro and0.3% from imports. In Honduras, the largest share of net <strong>in</strong>jection (59.3%) was from private hands(CEPAL, 2011).2.2.4 NicaraguaINE (Instituto Nicaragüense de Energía) is <strong>in</strong> charge of the general direction of policies concern<strong>in</strong>gelectricity and is the national electricity regulator. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ste<strong>in</strong>sdóttir and Ketilsson (2008),INE applies the policies def<strong>in</strong>ed by the government and is <strong>in</strong> charge of regulation and taxation. INEsupervises the price purchase agreement (PPA) between the distributor and the developer. When thedeveloper receives the exploration concession and has ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed the base load, the developer appliesto INE for a tariff. The developer can sell excess generation on the public market.In 2010, the total <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity across all available resource types <strong>in</strong> Nicaragua was 1,067.6 MWand peak demand was 538.9 MW. Thermal had the largest <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity 76.1%, hydroelectric9.8%, <strong>geothermal</strong> 8.2% and w<strong>in</strong>d 5.9%. Figure 5 shows that, <strong>in</strong> terms of evolution, <strong>in</strong>stalled capacityhas almost tripled <strong>in</strong> the last 20 years. Yearly demand was 3,304.7 GWh, generated from 71.9%thermal, 14.9% hydro, 8.1 % <strong>geothermal</strong>, 4.8% w<strong>in</strong>d and 0.3% from imports. In Nicaragua, the largestshare of net <strong>in</strong>jection (80%) was from private hands (CEPAL, 2011).2.2.5 Costa RicaPower service <strong>in</strong> Costa Rica is largely under the control of ICE (Instituto Costarricense deElectricidad) which acts as an adm<strong>in</strong>istrator and planner of short term policies, depend<strong>in</strong>g on thenecessity of the electric system. ICE is the only buyer and owner of the electric transmission l<strong>in</strong>es.From the capacity <strong>in</strong>stalled, ICE operates at 79.5% with proper <strong>plant</strong>s and at 13.8% with hired <strong>plant</strong>swith <strong>in</strong>dependent private generators (Grupo ICE, 2009).5
NET INJECTION BY SOURCE (2010)W<strong>in</strong>dImports 159.8 GWh10.2 GWh 4.8 %0.3 %Hydro495.0 GWh14.9 %INSTALLED ELECTRICITY GENERATION CAPACITY (1990 - 2010)1,200Hydro Geothermal W<strong>in</strong>d Thermal1,000800Thermal2,375.0 GWh71.9%Geothermal268.2 GWh8.1%600400200019901995200020042005200620072008MW20092010FIGURE 5: Nicaragua: Net <strong>in</strong>jection by source <strong>in</strong> 2010;<strong>in</strong>stalled electricity generation capacity 1990-2010In 2010, the total <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity across all available resource types <strong>in</strong> Costa Rica was 2,605.3 MWand peak demand was 1,535.6 MW. Hydro<strong>power</strong> had the largest <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity 59.6%,29.4% thermal, 6.4% <strong>geothermal</strong> and 4.6% w<strong>in</strong>d. Figure 6 shows that, <strong>in</strong> terms of evolution, <strong>in</strong>stalledcapacity has almost doubled <strong>in</strong> the last 10 years. Yearly demand was 9,565.2 GWh, generated from75.9% hydro, 12.3% <strong>geothermal</strong>, 7.4% thermal, 3.8% w<strong>in</strong>d and 0.6% from imports. In Costa Rica, thelargest share of net <strong>in</strong>jection (80%) was from public hands (CEPAL, 2011).NET INJECTION BY SOURCE (2010)Imports62.1 GWh0.6%Thermal706.6 GWh7.4%W<strong>in</strong>d358.7 GWh3.8%MWINSTALLED ELECTRICITY GENERATION CAPACITY (1999 - 2010)3,000Hydro Geothermal W<strong>in</strong>d Thermal2,5002,0001,500Geothermal1,176.1 GWh12.3%1,0005000199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010Hydro7,261.7 GWh75.9%FIGURE 6: Costa Rica: Net <strong>in</strong>jection by source <strong>in</strong> 2010;<strong>in</strong>stalled electricity generation capacity 1999-20102.2.6 PanamaThe Panamanian Electric Market started runn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1999. The new law <strong>in</strong>troduced the separation ofpolicy-mak<strong>in</strong>g, regulation and ownership functions. CND (Centro Nacional de Despacho) is thesection with<strong>in</strong> ETESA (Empresa de Transmisión Eléctrica, S.A.) that is <strong>in</strong> charge of system operationsand of the commercial adm<strong>in</strong>istration of the wholesale electricity market (Re<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong> et al., 2011).In 2010, the total <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity across all available resource types <strong>in</strong> Panama was 1,974.0 MW andpeak demand was 1,222.4 MW. Thermal had the largest <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity 52.6.3% and hydroelectric47.4%. Figure 7 shows that, <strong>in</strong> terms of evolution, <strong>in</strong>stalled capacity has almost doubled <strong>in</strong> the last 20years. Yearly demand was 7,319.1 GWh, generated from 41.4 % thermal, 57.7% hydro and 1.0% fromimports. In Panama, the largest share of net <strong>in</strong>jection (88.2%) was from private hands (CEPAL, 2011).2.2.7 Regional marketIn 1996, the sign<strong>in</strong>g of the Marco Treaty of the Electrical Market of Central America and of its twoprotocols fixated the legal framework for develop<strong>in</strong>g the project of the Central America ElectricInterconnection system (SIEPAC). The project has 2 levels: the creation of a sub regional market of6
- Page 1 and 2: GEOTHERMAL TRAINING PROGRAMMEHot sp
- Page 3 and 4: This MSc thesis has also been publi
- Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSMy gratitude to the
- Page 7 and 8: TABLE OF CONTENTSPage1. INTRODUCTIO
- Page 9 and 10: PageAPPENDIX A: FINANCIAL MODEL ...
- Page 12 and 13: 1. INTRODUCTIONRecent research on r
- Page 14 and 15: 2. CENTRAL AMERICAN DATA2.1 Power p
- Page 18 and 19: NET INJECTION BY SOURCE (2010)INSTA
- Page 20 and 21: income taxes for a period of 10 yea
- Page 22 and 23: annual temperature ranges from 17 t
- Page 24 and 25: egional reconnaissance in 1981ident
- Page 26 and 27: 4. GEOTHERMAL ELECTRICAL POWER ASSE
- Page 28 and 29: The net contribution of that power
- Page 30 and 31: Introducing , = , and , = ,
- Page 32 and 33: 9ProductionWellBoiler5Turbine~1046P
- Page 34 and 35: TABLE 3: Parameters and boundary co
- Page 36 and 37: eaches the maximum limit, and for h
- Page 38 and 39: 160180140160tc vap[i], th vap[i]120
- Page 40 and 41: average results, and combining them
- Page 42 and 43: The base cost ( ) can be calculate
- Page 44 and 45: calculation for another separator c
- Page 46 and 47: mass flow rate (kg/s) on the plant
- Page 48 and 49: Table 11 shows a summary of costs f
- Page 50 and 51: 5.6.4 Comparison of capital costs b
- Page 52 and 53: 6. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT
- Page 54 and 55: 6.2 Model structureThe financial fe
- Page 56 and 57: CCF = EBITDA − ∆Working Capital
- Page 58 and 59: Interest on loansFleischmann (2007)
- Page 60 and 61: IRR30%25%IRR CapitalIRR Equity20%Si
- Page 62 and 63: FIGURE 42: Allocation of funds for:
- Page 64 and 65: 340IRR Free Cash Flow to Equity [ %
- Page 66 and 67:
flash technology is between 0.3 and
- Page 68 and 69:
Energy Price Availability Factor O&
- Page 70 and 71:
FIGURE 50: Density and cumulative p
- Page 72 and 73:
In Chapter 6, Figure 44 illustrated
- Page 74 and 75:
The internal rate of return is offs
- Page 76 and 77:
Cengel, Y. and Tuner, R., 2005: Fun
- Page 78 and 79:
IEAb, 2011: Technology roadmap: Geo
- Page 80 and 81:
Salmon, J., Meurice, J., Wobus, N.,
- Page 82 and 83:
APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL MO
- Page 84 and 85:
APPENDIX C: INVESTMENT AND FINANCIN
- Page 86 and 87:
APPENDIX E: BALANCE SHEETBALANCE SH