30.11.2012 Views

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The New York Times/ - Politics, Sáb, 31 de Março de 2012<br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

Rape-Case Juror Called District Attorney<br />

‘Wonderful’ Friend in Note<br />

In late 2008, Lloyd E. Constantine, a lawyer and<br />

longtime adviser to former Gov. Eliot Spitzer, nearly<br />

gushed with affection when he explained in a letter to<br />

two candidates that he was not choosing one over the<br />

other in the election for Manhattan district attorney.<br />

Mr. Constantine called the candidates, Cyrus R. Vance<br />

Jr. and Richard Aborn, “wonderful friends” and said in<br />

the letter, which he released on Thursday, that he<br />

looked forward to their “continuing friendship.”<br />

But when Mr. Constantine was asked during the recent<br />

jury-selection process for the trial of a police officer<br />

facing rape charges whether he had any friends in law<br />

enforcement, including in the district attorney’s office,<br />

he did not mention Mr. Vance, who won the 2009<br />

election. Mr. Constantine was chosen as a juror.<br />

That omission became a central focus of the trial<br />

during jury deliberations this week, when another juror<br />

complained to the judge that Mr. Constantine had<br />

mentioned that he was a former law partner of Mr.<br />

Aborn. The other juror wondered whether Mr.<br />

Constantine might be holding the prosecution to an<br />

unduly high standard. It was then that Mr. Vance’s<br />

office realized the Mr. Constantine on the jury<br />

occasio<strong>na</strong>lly played tennis with the district attorney.<br />

Since the juror’s complaint on Tuesday, State<br />

Supreme Court in Manhattan has buzzed with<br />

comments from lawyers critical of Mr. Constantine for<br />

not divulging the relationship, which could have led to<br />

lawyers on the case challenging his presence on the<br />

jury.<br />

“He knows better than this,” said Thomas J. Curran, a<br />

defense lawyer and former prosecutor in the<br />

Manhattan district attorney’s office. “By any objective<br />

standard, that information should have been<br />

volunteered.”<br />

The jury convicted the officer, Michael Pe<strong>na</strong>, of<br />

crimi<strong>na</strong>l sexual assault and predatory sexual assault,<br />

charges that could send him to prison for life, but it<br />

deadlocked on two counts of rape and related charges<br />

on which the judge declared a mistrial.<br />

Mr. Constantine was one of three jurors who declined<br />

to convict Mr. Pe<strong>na</strong> on rape charges, according to one<br />

member of the jury who spoke on the condition of<br />

anonymity. In an e-mail on Friday, Mr. Constantine<br />

challenged that account but declined to cite specifics<br />

because, he said, the jurors had agreed not to discuss<br />

their deliberations publicly.<br />

The deadlock on charges so central to the case<br />

frustrated other members of the jury, raised the<br />

possibility of a retrial on those charges and resulted in<br />

a painfully incomplete resolution for the 25-year-old<br />

victim, a second-grade teacher who gasped and<br />

buckled in the courtroom when the mistrial was<br />

announced.<br />

In mid-March, as the sides prepared for trial, dozens of<br />

jurors were led through a questioning process. Each<br />

received a list of questions to be answered orally in<br />

front of the judge and lawyers.<br />

Question No. 7 asked: “Do you have any friends or<br />

relatives in law enforcement, i.e., police, F.B.I., district<br />

attorney,” according to a copy obtained by The New<br />

York Times.<br />

A transcript of the jury selection has not been<br />

completed. Mr. Constantine acknowledged, and others<br />

confirmed, that he did not mention Mr. Vance.<br />

After the other juror complained, Mr. Constantine<br />

explained to the judge and the lawyers on the case<br />

why he had decided not to do so. He said he had<br />

weighed the issue and decided that his relationships<br />

would not affect his assessment of the case. He also<br />

said that he thought mentioning Mr. Vance or Mr.<br />

Aborn would make it appear as though he was trying<br />

to shirk jury duty.<br />

The judge and the lawyers accepted his expla<strong>na</strong>tion,<br />

and deliberations continued with Mr. Constantine on<br />

the jury.<br />

In an interview just after the trial ended, Mr.<br />

Constantine said no question even came close to<br />

soliciting a mention of his relationships with Mr. Aborn<br />

and Mr. Vance.<br />

“I wasn’t asked a question,” he said. “There weren’t<br />

any close calls there. There wasn’t any hairsplitting.”<br />

On Thursday, his office sent the 2008 letter to The<br />

Times, in which Mr. Constantine wrote that if asked by<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!