STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The New York Times/ - Politics, Sáb, 31 de Março de 2012<br />
CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />
Rape-Case Juror Called District Attorney<br />
‘Wonderful’ Friend in Note<br />
In late 2008, Lloyd E. Constantine, a lawyer and<br />
longtime adviser to former Gov. Eliot Spitzer, nearly<br />
gushed with affection when he explained in a letter to<br />
two candidates that he was not choosing one over the<br />
other in the election for Manhattan district attorney.<br />
Mr. Constantine called the candidates, Cyrus R. Vance<br />
Jr. and Richard Aborn, “wonderful friends” and said in<br />
the letter, which he released on Thursday, that he<br />
looked forward to their “continuing friendship.”<br />
But when Mr. Constantine was asked during the recent<br />
jury-selection process for the trial of a police officer<br />
facing rape charges whether he had any friends in law<br />
enforcement, including in the district attorney’s office,<br />
he did not mention Mr. Vance, who won the 2009<br />
election. Mr. Constantine was chosen as a juror.<br />
That omission became a central focus of the trial<br />
during jury deliberations this week, when another juror<br />
complained to the judge that Mr. Constantine had<br />
mentioned that he was a former law partner of Mr.<br />
Aborn. The other juror wondered whether Mr.<br />
Constantine might be holding the prosecution to an<br />
unduly high standard. It was then that Mr. Vance’s<br />
office realized the Mr. Constantine on the jury<br />
occasio<strong>na</strong>lly played tennis with the district attorney.<br />
Since the juror’s complaint on Tuesday, State<br />
Supreme Court in Manhattan has buzzed with<br />
comments from lawyers critical of Mr. Constantine for<br />
not divulging the relationship, which could have led to<br />
lawyers on the case challenging his presence on the<br />
jury.<br />
“He knows better than this,” said Thomas J. Curran, a<br />
defense lawyer and former prosecutor in the<br />
Manhattan district attorney’s office. “By any objective<br />
standard, that information should have been<br />
volunteered.”<br />
The jury convicted the officer, Michael Pe<strong>na</strong>, of<br />
crimi<strong>na</strong>l sexual assault and predatory sexual assault,<br />
charges that could send him to prison for life, but it<br />
deadlocked on two counts of rape and related charges<br />
on which the judge declared a mistrial.<br />
Mr. Constantine was one of three jurors who declined<br />
to convict Mr. Pe<strong>na</strong> on rape charges, according to one<br />
member of the jury who spoke on the condition of<br />
anonymity. In an e-mail on Friday, Mr. Constantine<br />
challenged that account but declined to cite specifics<br />
because, he said, the jurors had agreed not to discuss<br />
their deliberations publicly.<br />
The deadlock on charges so central to the case<br />
frustrated other members of the jury, raised the<br />
possibility of a retrial on those charges and resulted in<br />
a painfully incomplete resolution for the 25-year-old<br />
victim, a second-grade teacher who gasped and<br />
buckled in the courtroom when the mistrial was<br />
announced.<br />
In mid-March, as the sides prepared for trial, dozens of<br />
jurors were led through a questioning process. Each<br />
received a list of questions to be answered orally in<br />
front of the judge and lawyers.<br />
Question No. 7 asked: “Do you have any friends or<br />
relatives in law enforcement, i.e., police, F.B.I., district<br />
attorney,” according to a copy obtained by The New<br />
York Times.<br />
A transcript of the jury selection has not been<br />
completed. Mr. Constantine acknowledged, and others<br />
confirmed, that he did not mention Mr. Vance.<br />
After the other juror complained, Mr. Constantine<br />
explained to the judge and the lawyers on the case<br />
why he had decided not to do so. He said he had<br />
weighed the issue and decided that his relationships<br />
would not affect his assessment of the case. He also<br />
said that he thought mentioning Mr. Vance or Mr.<br />
Aborn would make it appear as though he was trying<br />
to shirk jury duty.<br />
The judge and the lawyers accepted his expla<strong>na</strong>tion,<br />
and deliberations continued with Mr. Constantine on<br />
the jury.<br />
In an interview just after the trial ended, Mr.<br />
Constantine said no question even came close to<br />
soliciting a mention of his relationships with Mr. Aborn<br />
and Mr. Vance.<br />
“I wasn’t asked a question,” he said. “There weren’t<br />
any close calls there. There wasn’t any hairsplitting.”<br />
On Thursday, his office sent the 2008 letter to The<br />
Times, in which Mr. Constantine wrote that if asked by<br />
98