STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Business Line/ - Markets, Sáb, 31 de Março de 2012<br />
CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />
Retrospective change in tax laws grossly<br />
unfair: Vodafone<br />
New Delhi, March 30:<br />
Vodafone on Friday said that any move by the<br />
Government to retrospectively change the tax regime<br />
was grossly unjust. The telecom major said the<br />
proposed changes in the Fi<strong>na</strong>nce Bill contradicts the<br />
conclusions of the Supreme Court and hence raises<br />
constitutio<strong>na</strong>l questions for India.<br />
“The proposed changes seek to apply, on a<br />
retrospective basis, tax liabilities which explicitly were<br />
not in force at the time of the transaction between<br />
Vodafone and Hutchison,” the British telecom major<br />
said in a statement.<br />
This is the first reaction from Vodafone after the<br />
Fi<strong>na</strong>nce Minister, Mr Pra<strong>na</strong>b Mukherjee, moved<br />
numerous amendments to the income-tax law to<br />
reverse the Supreme Court ruling on the matter. If the<br />
amendments were to be e<strong>na</strong>cted into law, Vodafone<br />
could face a tax bill of at least $2 billion for the near<br />
$11.2-billion deal with Hutchison in 2007.<br />
The Supreme Court had, in the Vodafone case, ruled<br />
that gains derived from transfer of shares of a foreign<br />
company cannot be taxed in India, even if the value of<br />
shares is substantially derived from assets located in<br />
India.<br />
Now, the Government has come up with a spate of<br />
amendments that too on a retrospective basis from<br />
April 1962, to bring Vodafone-Hutchison type<br />
transactions into the tax net. The amendments are<br />
being proposed as part of the Fi<strong>na</strong>nce Bill 2012.<br />
“These facts have been examined in detail by the<br />
highest court in the land, which delivered an<br />
u<strong>na</strong>mbiguous judgment affirming that there is indeed<br />
no tax due on the transaction,” Vodafone said adding<br />
that since it was the acquirer in this transaction, the<br />
company made no capital gain whatsoever.<br />
“The proposed changes in the Fi<strong>na</strong>nce Bill<br />
fundamentally contradict the firm conclusions of the<br />
apex court and as such raise important constitutio<strong>na</strong>l<br />
questions for India as well as widespread and<br />
profound concerns in the minds of inter<strong>na</strong>tio<strong>na</strong>l<br />
investors,” Vodafone said. The telecom company said<br />
that it was considering a number of courses of action,<br />
both in India and inter<strong>na</strong>tio<strong>na</strong>lly.<br />
tkt@thehindu.co.in<br />
67