STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The New York Times/ - Politics, Sex, 30 de Março de 2012<br />
CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />
Taking Responsibility for Death<br />
I WAS standing by my 89-year-old mother’s hospital<br />
bed when she asked a doctor, “Is there anything you<br />
can do here to give me back the life I had last year,<br />
when I wasn’t in pain every minute?” The young<br />
medical resident, stunned by the directness of the<br />
question, blurted out, “Honestly, ma’am, no.”<br />
And so Irma Broderick Jacoby went home and lived<br />
another year, during which she never again entered a<br />
hospital or subjected herself to an invasive, expensive<br />
medical procedure. The pain of multiple degenerative<br />
diseases was eased by prescription drugs, and she<br />
died last November after two weeks in a hospice, on<br />
terms determined by explicit legal instructions and<br />
discussions with her children — no respirators, no<br />
artificial feeding, no attempts to buy one more day for<br />
a body that would not let her turn over in bed or<br />
swallow without agony.<br />
The hospice room and pain-relieving palliative care<br />
cost only about $400 a day, while the average hospital<br />
stay costs Medicare over $6,000 a day. Although<br />
Mom’s main concern was her comfort and dignity, she<br />
also took satisfaction in not running up Medicare<br />
payments for unwanted treatments and not leaving<br />
private medical bills for her children to pay. A third of<br />
the Medicare budget is now spent in the last year of<br />
life, and a third of that goes for care in the last month.<br />
Those figures would surely be lower if more<br />
Americans, while they were still healthy, took the<br />
initiative to spell out what treatments they do — and do<br />
not — want by writing living wills and appointing health<br />
care proxies.<br />
As the aging baby boom generation places<br />
unprecedented demands on the health care system,<br />
there is little ordi<strong>na</strong>ry citizens can do — witness the<br />
tortuous arguments in the Supreme Court this week<br />
over the constitutio<strong>na</strong>lity of the Affordable Care Act —<br />
to influence either the cost or the quality of the<br />
treatment they receive. However, end-of-life planning<br />
is one of the few actions within the power of individuals<br />
who wish to help themselves and their society. Too<br />
few Americans are shouldering this responsibility.<br />
Of course many people want more aggressive<br />
treatment than my mother. And advance directives<br />
aren’t “death panels”; they can also be used to ensure<br />
the deployment of every tool of modern medicine.<br />
They can be changed or withdrawn at any time by a<br />
mentally competent person.<br />
But public opinion polls consistently show that most<br />
Americans, like my mother, worry about too much<br />
rather than too little medical intervention. In a Pew<br />
Research Center poll released in 2006, only 22<br />
percent said a doctor should always try to save a<br />
patient’s life, while 70 percent believed that patients<br />
should sometimes be allowed to die. More than half<br />
said they would tell their doctor to end treatment if they<br />
were in great pain with no hope of improvement.<br />
Yet only 69 percent had discussed end-of-life care with<br />
a spouse; just 17 percent, or 40 percent of those over<br />
65, had done so with their children. One-third of<br />
Americans had a living will and even fewer have taken<br />
the more legally enforceable measure of appointing a<br />
health care proxy to act on their behalf if they cannot<br />
act for themselves.<br />
The latter omission is especially disturbing because by<br />
2030, more than 8.5 million Americans will be over 85<br />
— an age at which roughly half will suffer from<br />
Alzheimer’s disease or some other form of irreversible<br />
dementia. For many members of the baby boom<br />
generation — more likely to be divorced and childless<br />
than their parents — there may be no legal next of kin.<br />
Without advance directives, even a loving child may be<br />
ignorant of her parent’s wishes. My mother remained<br />
conscious and in charge of her care until just a few<br />
days before she died, but like most women over 85,<br />
she was a widow. My younger brother died of<br />
pancreatic cancer two weeks before she did. It was an<br />
immense comfort to me, at a terrible time, to have no<br />
doubts about what she wanted.<br />
My mother drew up her directives in the 1980s, when<br />
she was a volunteer in the critical care lounge of her<br />
local hospital. She once watched, appalled, as an adult<br />
daughter threw a coffeepot at her brother for<br />
suggesting that their comatose mother’s respirator be<br />
turned off. Because the siblings could not agree and<br />
the patient had no living will, she was kept hooked up<br />
to machines for another two weeks at a cost (then) of<br />
nearly $80,000 to Medicare and $20,000 to her family<br />
— even though her doctors agreed there was no<br />
hope.<br />
The worst imagi<strong>na</strong>ble horror for my mother was that<br />
she might be kept alive by expensive and painful<br />
procedures when she no longer had a functioning<br />
brain. She was equally horrified by the idea of family<br />
fights around her deathbed. “I don’t want one of you<br />
throwing a coffeepot at the other,” she told us in a<br />
half-joking, half-serious fashion.<br />
48