30.11.2012 Views

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The New York Times/ - Politics, Sex, 30 de Março de 2012<br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

Taking Responsibility for Death<br />

I WAS standing by my 89-year-old mother’s hospital<br />

bed when she asked a doctor, “Is there anything you<br />

can do here to give me back the life I had last year,<br />

when I wasn’t in pain every minute?” The young<br />

medical resident, stunned by the directness of the<br />

question, blurted out, “Honestly, ma’am, no.”<br />

And so Irma Broderick Jacoby went home and lived<br />

another year, during which she never again entered a<br />

hospital or subjected herself to an invasive, expensive<br />

medical procedure. The pain of multiple degenerative<br />

diseases was eased by prescription drugs, and she<br />

died last November after two weeks in a hospice, on<br />

terms determined by explicit legal instructions and<br />

discussions with her children — no respirators, no<br />

artificial feeding, no attempts to buy one more day for<br />

a body that would not let her turn over in bed or<br />

swallow without agony.<br />

The hospice room and pain-relieving palliative care<br />

cost only about $400 a day, while the average hospital<br />

stay costs Medicare over $6,000 a day. Although<br />

Mom’s main concern was her comfort and dignity, she<br />

also took satisfaction in not running up Medicare<br />

payments for unwanted treatments and not leaving<br />

private medical bills for her children to pay. A third of<br />

the Medicare budget is now spent in the last year of<br />

life, and a third of that goes for care in the last month.<br />

Those figures would surely be lower if more<br />

Americans, while they were still healthy, took the<br />

initiative to spell out what treatments they do — and do<br />

not — want by writing living wills and appointing health<br />

care proxies.<br />

As the aging baby boom generation places<br />

unprecedented demands on the health care system,<br />

there is little ordi<strong>na</strong>ry citizens can do — witness the<br />

tortuous arguments in the Supreme Court this week<br />

over the constitutio<strong>na</strong>lity of the Affordable Care Act —<br />

to influence either the cost or the quality of the<br />

treatment they receive. However, end-of-life planning<br />

is one of the few actions within the power of individuals<br />

who wish to help themselves and their society. Too<br />

few Americans are shouldering this responsibility.<br />

Of course many people want more aggressive<br />

treatment than my mother. And advance directives<br />

aren’t “death panels”; they can also be used to ensure<br />

the deployment of every tool of modern medicine.<br />

They can be changed or withdrawn at any time by a<br />

mentally competent person.<br />

But public opinion polls consistently show that most<br />

Americans, like my mother, worry about too much<br />

rather than too little medical intervention. In a Pew<br />

Research Center poll released in 2006, only 22<br />

percent said a doctor should always try to save a<br />

patient’s life, while 70 percent believed that patients<br />

should sometimes be allowed to die. More than half<br />

said they would tell their doctor to end treatment if they<br />

were in great pain with no hope of improvement.<br />

Yet only 69 percent had discussed end-of-life care with<br />

a spouse; just 17 percent, or 40 percent of those over<br />

65, had done so with their children. One-third of<br />

Americans had a living will and even fewer have taken<br />

the more legally enforceable measure of appointing a<br />

health care proxy to act on their behalf if they cannot<br />

act for themselves.<br />

The latter omission is especially disturbing because by<br />

2030, more than 8.5 million Americans will be over 85<br />

— an age at which roughly half will suffer from<br />

Alzheimer’s disease or some other form of irreversible<br />

dementia. For many members of the baby boom<br />

generation — more likely to be divorced and childless<br />

than their parents — there may be no legal next of kin.<br />

Without advance directives, even a loving child may be<br />

ignorant of her parent’s wishes. My mother remained<br />

conscious and in charge of her care until just a few<br />

days before she died, but like most women over 85,<br />

she was a widow. My younger brother died of<br />

pancreatic cancer two weeks before she did. It was an<br />

immense comfort to me, at a terrible time, to have no<br />

doubts about what she wanted.<br />

My mother drew up her directives in the 1980s, when<br />

she was a volunteer in the critical care lounge of her<br />

local hospital. She once watched, appalled, as an adult<br />

daughter threw a coffeepot at her brother for<br />

suggesting that their comatose mother’s respirator be<br />

turned off. Because the siblings could not agree and<br />

the patient had no living will, she was kept hooked up<br />

to machines for another two weeks at a cost (then) of<br />

nearly $80,000 to Medicare and $20,000 to her family<br />

— even though her doctors agreed there was no<br />

hope.<br />

The worst imagi<strong>na</strong>ble horror for my mother was that<br />

she might be kept alive by expensive and painful<br />

procedures when she no longer had a functioning<br />

brain. She was equally horrified by the idea of family<br />

fights around her deathbed. “I don’t want one of you<br />

throwing a coffeepot at the other,” she told us in a<br />

half-joking, half-serious fashion.<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!