STF na Mídia - MyClipp

new citadel had “fine big windows to throw the New
Deal out of.”
Now conservative justices may throw Obama’s
hard-won law out of those fine big windows. They’ve
already been playing Twister, turning precedents into
pretzels to achieve their political objective. In 2005,
Scalia was endorsing a broad interpretation of the
commerce clause and the necessary and proper
clause, the clauses now coming under scrutiny from
the majority, including the swing vote, Justice Anthony
Kennedy. (Could the dream of expanded health care
die at the hands of a Kennedy?)
The New York Times/ - Politics, Qua, 04 de Abril de 2012
CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)
Scalia, Roberts, Thomas and the insufferable Samuel
Alito were nurtured in the conservative Federalist
Society, which asserts that “it is emphatically the
province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law
is, not what it should be.”
But it isn’t conservative to overturn a major law passed
by Congress in the middle of an election. The
majority’s political motives are as naked as a
strip-search.
271