STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
USA Today/ - News, Ter, 03 de Abril de 2012<br />
CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />
Obama defends Supreme Court remarks<br />
President Obama defended his comments on the<br />
Supreme Court today, even as Republicans accused<br />
him of trying to intimidate the justices into upholding<br />
the health care law or be attacked as being overtly<br />
political.<br />
"The point I was making is that the Supreme Court is<br />
the fi<strong>na</strong>l say on our Constitution and our laws, and all<br />
of us have to respect it -- but it's precisely because of<br />
that extraordi<strong>na</strong>ry power that the court has traditio<strong>na</strong>lly<br />
exercised significant restraint and deference to our<br />
duly elected legislature, our Congress," Obama told a<br />
group of newspaper editors.<br />
"And so the burden is on those who would overturn a<br />
law like this," Obama said.<br />
Earlier today, Se<strong>na</strong>te Minority Leader Mitch<br />
McConnell, R-Ky., said Obama's comments on<br />
Monday "reflect not only an attempt to influence the<br />
outcome, but a preview of Democrat attacks to come if<br />
they don't get their way."<br />
Earlier post:<br />
The chattering classes in Washington are still buzzing<br />
about President Obama's comments -- or were they<br />
threats? -- about the pending Supreme Court decision<br />
on the health care case.<br />
The president expressed confidence Monday that the<br />
court would uphold the statute this summer, but also<br />
served warning that an adverse ruling would be viewed<br />
(and criticized) as a political act by the justices.<br />
"I'd just remind conservative commentators that for<br />
years what we've heard is, the biggest problem on the<br />
bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint<br />
-- that an unelected group of people would somehow<br />
overturn a duly constituted and passed law," Obama<br />
said. "Well, this is a good example."<br />
Republican Mitt Romney wondered if Obama was<br />
trying to intimidate the court, but added that "I don't<br />
think that would work."<br />
"I also think it's quite a curious turn of events to start<br />
complaining about an activist court," Romney also told<br />
Fox News.<br />
Other Republicans reacted with more ire.<br />
Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said "it must be nice living in<br />
a fantasy world where every law you like is<br />
constitutio<strong>na</strong>l and every Supreme Court decision you<br />
don't is 'activist.'" He also said it appears that Obama's<br />
comments are part of a political strategy.<br />
"The memo appears to have gone out from the<br />
president's campaign that criticizing the Supreme<br />
Court is going to help his re-election," Hatch said.<br />
"This is disappointing, and is likely to be as successful<br />
as his administration's defense of the unconstitutio<strong>na</strong>l<br />
health care law last week."<br />
Some of the court's more conservative justices harshly<br />
questioned the law's key provision, the so-called<br />
individual mandate that requires most Americans to<br />
buy health insurance or pay a fine.<br />
Some of the president's supporters, such as Rep.<br />
James Clyburn, D-S.C., have suggested that Obama<br />
make the Supreme Court a campaign issue if it rules<br />
against health care.<br />
A decision is expected in June.<br />
Obama wouldn't be the first president to tangle with the<br />
high court in public. It's been tried by presidents<br />
ranging from Andrew Jackson to Franklin D.<br />
Roosevelt, from Richard Nixon to Ro<strong>na</strong>ld Reagan.<br />
Yet the court -- an independent branch of government,<br />
after all -- has its own unique powers.<br />
Even some supporters of the health care law<br />
expressed dismay over the president's comments.<br />
Ruth Marcus, a columnist for The Washington Post,<br />
said Obama's description of the court as "an unelected<br />
group of people" left her cold, Marcus wrote. "I would<br />
lament a ruling striking down the individual mandate,<br />
but I would not denounce it as conservative justices<br />
run amok.<br />
"Listening to the arguments and reading the transcript,<br />
the justices struck me as a group wrestling with a<br />
legitimate, even difficult, constitutio<strong>na</strong>l question,"<br />
Marcus wrote.<br />
250