30.11.2012 Views

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Economic Times/ - News, Ter, 03 de Abril de 2012<br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

Supreme Court seeks details of 18 mercy<br />

pleas before President<br />

NEW DELHI: In a significant move, the Supreme<br />

Court today directed the Centre to furnish details of 18<br />

mercy pleas, including that of Parliament attack death<br />

convict Afzal Guru, pending disposal before the<br />

President.<br />

A bench of justices G S Singhvi and S J<br />

Mukhopadhaya also asked eminent jurist Ram<br />

Jethmalani to file written submissions on "whether the<br />

President should objectively apply mind while deciding<br />

mercy petitions".<br />

The apex court felt that the role of the state was<br />

perhaps advisory and the fi<strong>na</strong>l verdict is of the<br />

President.<br />

The court passed directions while dealing with the<br />

appeal filed by death convict Devender Pal Singh<br />

Bhullar, challenging the undue delay in disposal of his<br />

mercy petition by the President.<br />

The bench asked Additio<strong>na</strong>l Solicitor General Haren<br />

Raval to produce the files relating to 18 death row<br />

convicts whose mercy petitions are pending for<br />

disposal for the past one to seven years.<br />

Appearing for Bhullar, senior counsel K T S Tulsi told<br />

the court that between 1997 and 2011, the President<br />

has disposed off 32 mercy petitions, 13 of which were<br />

done after a 10-year wait.<br />

He submitted 14 other cases were disposed off after a<br />

delay ranging between four and 10 years, while the<br />

remaining cases were disposed off between one-four<br />

years.<br />

Earlier Jethmalani told the court that there should not<br />

be even a day's delay in disposal of the mercy petition<br />

of the convict as it was violative of the persons right to<br />

liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.<br />

He submitted that section 302 IPC prescribes a<br />

maximum sentence of death but delay in execution of<br />

the death sentence or disposal of the mercy petition<br />

amounted to imposing additio<strong>na</strong>l punishment on the<br />

convict "if not sanctioned by law".<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!