30.11.2012 Views

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Business Insurance/ - Article, Seg, 02 de Abril de 2012<br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

Individual mandate rejection seen as<br />

worst legal outcome<br />

WASHINGTON—Deciding that the individual mandate<br />

in the health care reform law is unconstitutio<strong>na</strong>l while<br />

keeping the rest of the law intact would be the<br />

“worst-case sce<strong>na</strong>rio” of possible Supreme Court<br />

actions on the law, most industry experts agree.<br />

“It does not put us back to where we were prior to<br />

health care reform. It puts us in a place that is much<br />

worse than that,” said Jim Napoli, senior counsel with<br />

Proskauer Rose L.L.P. in Washington.<br />

Hewrote an amicus brief on behalf of the<br />

Washington-based American Benefits Council<br />

suggesting that the court should strike the employer<br />

mandate if it decides the individual mandate is<br />

unconstitutio<strong>na</strong>l.<br />

“It would cause employers to seriously consider<br />

whether to remain in the health care game” because<br />

“for many employers, the cost of the pe<strong>na</strong>lty would be<br />

less than the cost to actually provide coverage,” he<br />

said.<br />

Moreover, “insurers may pull out of certain markets<br />

and not provide individual coverage. What does that<br />

do to the group market? Or what does it do the cost of<br />

health care in a more general sense? The employers<br />

that self-fund will still be impacted even if they"re not<br />

purchasing an insured product because the cost of<br />

health care will go up. That"s the negative<br />

consequence of it,” Mr. Napoli said.<br />

“The insurance industry will just increase the cost for<br />

everyone,” said Larry Boress, president and CEO of<br />

the Midwest Business Group on Health in Chicago.<br />

Of eight states that e<strong>na</strong>cted guaranteed issue and<br />

community rating without an individual mandate, “three<br />

went into the ditch and only five were left standing, but<br />

they are limping along,” said Paul Keckley, executive<br />

director of the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions<br />

based in Washington.<br />

Indeed, during oral arguments, Solicitor General<br />

Do<strong>na</strong>ld B. Verrilli Jr. told the court that when<br />

community rating and guaranteed issue were<br />

implemented in New Jersey, rates soared and the<br />

number of individuals covered plummeted from<br />

180,000 to 80,000. “In Kentucky, virtually every insurer<br />

left the market,” he added.<br />

Ed Haislmaier, senior research fellow in the Center for<br />

Health Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation,<br />

predicts that if PPACA is allowed to stand without the<br />

individual mandate “the whole thing goes south very<br />

quickly.”<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!