STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
STF na MÃdia - MyClipp
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Business Insurance/ - Article, Seg, 02 de Abril de 2012<br />
CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />
OPINION: Health care reform law<br />
requires fast resolution by court<br />
THE MOST SIGNIFICANT takeaway from last week"s<br />
oral arguments on the health care reform law before<br />
the Supreme Court was a near-consensus among the<br />
justices that they should resolve the legal issues by the<br />
end of the court"s current term in June.<br />
Justices spanning a wide range of the ideological<br />
spectrum were openly skeptical of arguments<br />
presented by Robert Long, a court-appointed attorney,<br />
that an obscure 1867 law prevents the court from<br />
taking up the case until a tax has been paid—in this<br />
case the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act"s<br />
requirement that most U.S. residents either enroll in a<br />
qualified plan or pay a pe<strong>na</strong>lty.<br />
The individual mandate doesn"t take effect until 2014,<br />
with the pe<strong>na</strong>lty for those not enrolled in a plan due in<br />
2015. If the justices had accepted Mr. Long"s<br />
argument that it is too soon to hear the case—which<br />
we don"t think they did—the result would have been<br />
years of uncertainty and potential chaos.<br />
Consider the issue of prescription drug coverage that<br />
some employers offer to Medicare-eligible retirees.<br />
The health care reform law, effective next year, pares<br />
a big tax break Congress extended to employers as<br />
part of a 2003 law to encourage them to continue the<br />
drug plans.<br />
In response to the dilution of the tax break, many<br />
employers are preparing to revamp or even elimi<strong>na</strong>te<br />
the retiree drug plans.<br />
What if the Supreme Court were to wait until 2015 to<br />
decide the future of the health care reform law and it<br />
then strikes down the entire law, which presumably<br />
would restore the prescription drug tax break?<br />
Employers, at least in some cases, would have<br />
changed their plans needlessly.<br />
Of course, there are far bigger issues than that. By<br />
2014, states are supposed to set up exchanges where<br />
millions of previously uninsured people will use their<br />
health care reform law premium subsidies to buy<br />
coverage. If the justices were to strike down the law in<br />
2015, think of all the time and money the states would<br />
waste in establishing the exchanges.<br />
Fortu<strong>na</strong>tely, if our reading of the justices" comments is<br />
right and a court ruling is handed down in June, those<br />
sce<strong>na</strong>rios will not develop. And everyone should<br />
welcome a quick resolution of the law"s future.<br />
165