30.11.2012 Views

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Business Insurance/ - Article, Seg, 02 de Abril de 2012<br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

OPINION: Health care reform law<br />

requires fast resolution by court<br />

THE MOST SIGNIFICANT takeaway from last week"s<br />

oral arguments on the health care reform law before<br />

the Supreme Court was a near-consensus among the<br />

justices that they should resolve the legal issues by the<br />

end of the court"s current term in June.<br />

Justices spanning a wide range of the ideological<br />

spectrum were openly skeptical of arguments<br />

presented by Robert Long, a court-appointed attorney,<br />

that an obscure 1867 law prevents the court from<br />

taking up the case until a tax has been paid—in this<br />

case the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act"s<br />

requirement that most U.S. residents either enroll in a<br />

qualified plan or pay a pe<strong>na</strong>lty.<br />

The individual mandate doesn"t take effect until 2014,<br />

with the pe<strong>na</strong>lty for those not enrolled in a plan due in<br />

2015. If the justices had accepted Mr. Long"s<br />

argument that it is too soon to hear the case—which<br />

we don"t think they did—the result would have been<br />

years of uncertainty and potential chaos.<br />

Consider the issue of prescription drug coverage that<br />

some employers offer to Medicare-eligible retirees.<br />

The health care reform law, effective next year, pares<br />

a big tax break Congress extended to employers as<br />

part of a 2003 law to encourage them to continue the<br />

drug plans.<br />

In response to the dilution of the tax break, many<br />

employers are preparing to revamp or even elimi<strong>na</strong>te<br />

the retiree drug plans.<br />

What if the Supreme Court were to wait until 2015 to<br />

decide the future of the health care reform law and it<br />

then strikes down the entire law, which presumably<br />

would restore the prescription drug tax break?<br />

Employers, at least in some cases, would have<br />

changed their plans needlessly.<br />

Of course, there are far bigger issues than that. By<br />

2014, states are supposed to set up exchanges where<br />

millions of previously uninsured people will use their<br />

health care reform law premium subsidies to buy<br />

coverage. If the justices were to strike down the law in<br />

2015, think of all the time and money the states would<br />

waste in establishing the exchanges.<br />

Fortu<strong>na</strong>tely, if our reading of the justices" comments is<br />

right and a court ruling is handed down in June, those<br />

sce<strong>na</strong>rios will not develop. And everyone should<br />

welcome a quick resolution of the law"s future.<br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!