30.11.2012 Views

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

USA Today/ - News, Dom, 01 de Abril de 2012<br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

Letters: 'Stand your ground' laws are<br />

needed<br />

You editorial on "stand your ground" laws shoots first<br />

and asks questions later ("Editorial: 'Stand your<br />

ground' is a recipe for tragedy").<br />

First, unless you are part of one of the agencies<br />

investigating this case, you don't have all the facts.<br />

Second, the law is intended so people can legally<br />

defend themselves without the worry of some<br />

"wan<strong>na</strong>-be politician" district attorney looking to better<br />

his or her own career at the expense of someone's<br />

life.<br />

I live in Florida, and the stand-your-ground law is here<br />

to stay.<br />

Walt Todd; Riverview, Fla.<br />

Court reflects divided U.S.<br />

Your editorial on the health care law debate was, I<br />

believe, fairly reaso<strong>na</strong>ble and balanced until the fi<strong>na</strong>l<br />

paragraph. It states: "Another 5-4 decision along<br />

ideological lines would taint the court's credibility. The<br />

court would do itself, and the <strong>na</strong>tion, a service by<br />

upholding the mandate" ("Editorial: Health care, yes.<br />

Broccoli, no.").<br />

Based on the rest of the editorial and most reports<br />

about the hearing, the decision is likely to be 5-4<br />

whichever way the court goes. The comment above<br />

seems to imply a 5-4 ruling in support of the law will do<br />

less damage to the court's credibility than a 5-4<br />

against.<br />

Or is the editor suggesting that one side or the other,<br />

presumably the conservative, should give in for the<br />

sake of a credibility-building u<strong>na</strong>nimous decision?<br />

I have not done a statistical a<strong>na</strong>lysis of Supreme<br />

Court decisions, but many of the landmark cases I<br />

remember came from ideologically divided courts,<br />

usually reflecting deep ideological divides in the<br />

country at large.<br />

Frank Jemmison; Portsmouth, Va.<br />

Use common sense on mandates<br />

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wants to know<br />

about the difference between health insurance and<br />

broccoli mandates.<br />

The answer is simple. There is no chance that<br />

individuals will have to be forced to buy broccoli to<br />

save their lives, and there is no chance that the other<br />

customers in the grocery store will be forced to chip in<br />

for the cost of someone else's life-saving broccoli.<br />

Christoph Bull; Los Angeles<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!