30.11.2012 Views

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

STF na Mídia - MyClipp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Administration to approve generic versions of the<br />

complex and often expensive drugs known as<br />

biologics and imposed a 10 percent tax on tanning<br />

salons — all relatively minor provisions that could be<br />

accomplished through legislation.<br />

But others were more pessimistic, noting that<br />

Congress is so mired in election-year politics that even<br />

such seemingly benign measures could be blocked.<br />

And there is little hope that Congress could devise an<br />

alter<strong>na</strong>tive to the law anytime soon. “If this law is<br />

completely thrown out, a lot of momentum to solve<br />

some of these problems is going to be vitiated,” said<br />

Helen Darling, the chief executive of the Natio<strong>na</strong>l<br />

Business Group on Health, which represents<br />

employers that offer health benefits.<br />

How much the states could continue on their own is<br />

unclear. “In this political environment, it’s going to be<br />

exceedingly difficult,” said Mike Kreidler, the insurance<br />

commissioner for Washington State, who supports the<br />

law.<br />

Some states like California and Maryland have made<br />

progress in creating the exchanges, where people will<br />

be able to more easily shop for policies. But many<br />

questioned whether most states would be able to<br />

proceed without federal funding.<br />

“There might be some states that will go forward, but it<br />

will be a crazy-quilt pattern,” said Ron Pollack,<br />

executive director of Families USA, a consumer group<br />

that supported the health care law. (He is no relation to<br />

Ms. Pollack, the retail association official.)<br />

Both insurers and employers predicted that most<br />

The New York Times/ - Politics, Sáb, 31 de Março de 2012<br />

CLIPPING INTERNACIONAL (Supreme Court)<br />

insurance companies would continue popular policies<br />

that were e<strong>na</strong>cted under the law. Insurers have<br />

already factored in the costs of allowing adults under<br />

26 to be covered on their parents’ plans and<br />

elimi<strong>na</strong>ting co-payments on preventive services, and<br />

companies are also unlikely to reimpose lifetime limits<br />

on coverage. “It’s more trouble to roll it back,” said Mr.<br />

Laszewski, the health care consultant. “It’s part of the<br />

market now.”<br />

Other provisions in the law tried to experiment with<br />

changes to how doctors and hospitals are paid,<br />

moving away from the current system in which they<br />

make more by performing more tests and procedures<br />

to rewarding them more for delivering better care that<br />

saves money by keeping patients out of the hospital<br />

and emergency room.<br />

But much of the ability of hospitals to change how they<br />

care for patients, even as government programs like<br />

Medicare and Medicaid pay them less, was dependent<br />

on the tens of millions of new paying customers, said<br />

Len M. Nichols, a health economist at George Mason<br />

University who supports the law. “Everybody thought it<br />

would buy them time to become as efficient as they<br />

need to be,” he said.<br />

Still many hospital executives and insurers say big<br />

changes in how care is being delivered will continue<br />

regardless of the law. “It’s been our experience and<br />

observation that the health care system has been<br />

undergoing reform for some time before this debate<br />

and this bill of 2010,” said Richard J. Umbdenstock,<br />

head of the American Hospital Association. “We’re<br />

already making dramatic course changes.”<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!