12.07.2015 Views

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COUNCIL MINUTESTUESDAY 26 JUNE 2012The petitioners have requested that no path be constructed and are most concerned about thereduction in dense vegetation and the impact on trees requiring removal or pruning.The path alignment detailed in <strong>Council</strong>'s advice letter dated 4 May 2012 was for this path to be3.0 metres wide and be on the east side <strong>of</strong> Launceston Avenue directly adjacent the existingkerbing for the full length.This would involve removal <strong>of</strong> all shrub planting within approximately 4.0 metres <strong>of</strong> the existingkerb line and pruning <strong>of</strong> all trees to allow for at least a 2.0 metre height clearance. It isexpected only one or two skinny tall trees would be removed as they are within the area 3.0metres from kerb edge area.Other trees will be pruned to allow path users to comfortably use the path.On inspection <strong>of</strong> the proposed path alignment, Mr Coyle was advised it was <strong>Council</strong>'s intentionto complete an extensive program <strong>of</strong> new planting <strong>of</strong> screen shrubs and trees to ensure asuitable screen from the West Coast Highway traffic is maintained. <strong>Council</strong> would intend tocommence this planting works as soon as the project commenced. This matter was highlightedin the <strong>Council</strong> letter dated 4 May 2012 which was delivered to all Launceston Avenue residents.The planting <strong>of</strong> shrubs and bushes to screen West Coast Highway would result in denseplanting similar to the following locations within the <strong>Town</strong> which have been planted for similarreasons:-• Roundabout at Empire Avenue and The Boulevard to protect adjacent properties;• Oceanic Drive median west <strong>of</strong> Bold Park Drive;• The Boulevard/Ulster Road slip lane.It has been explained to Mr Coyle that <strong>Council</strong> considerers the construction <strong>of</strong> this shared pathlink is very important to create safe connectivity throughout the <strong>Town</strong> for pedestrians andcyclists.One alignment has been discussed which has the path adjacent to the current kerb line onLaunceston Avenue. On inspection with a second petitioner from 17 Launceston Avenue, asecond alignment is possible for the southern portion <strong>of</strong> the total link. From Helson Avenue toabout number 33/35, the path link must remain on the kerb line as there is little median widthseparating Launceston Avenue and West Coast Highway. This area would receive massplantings as part <strong>of</strong> the construction. The alternate alignment, south from number 33/35, wouldfollow the location <strong>of</strong> the old West Coast Highway pavement which is clearly visible on aerialphotographs and when inspecting the site. This path could commence opposite about number33/35 Launceston Avenue and continue south to the underpass. It is now recommended thisalternate link be adopted for the construction.If an alignment is adopted, the intention would be to prepare and pour both path links togetherbetween Helston Avenue and Rochdale Road. The attachment provides aerial photographs <strong>of</strong>the Launceston Avenue proposed routes.POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:There are no Policy or Statutory Implications related to this report.H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\JUNE 2012\C CR.DOCX 62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!