12.07.2015 Views

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COUNCIL MINUTESTUESDAY 26 JUNE 2012Applicant's justificationThe applicant has provided written justification for the variations to the acceptable developmentprovisions relating to the retaining wall variation.Neighbour submissionThe <strong>Town</strong> notified the owners <strong>of</strong> the properties adjoining the subject site, being No. 123Grovedale Road to the northern side and No. 304 Salvado Road to the rear (west). Asubmission was received from the owners <strong>of</strong> No. 123 Grovedale Road objecting to the height <strong>of</strong>the proposed retaining and possible overlooking from the dwelling.Performance criteria assessmentSite worksRetaining and fillPerformance criteria:ProposedMaximum 700 mm highretaining wall on northernside boundaryAcceptable development provisionMaximum 500mm <strong>of</strong> retaining walland fill.Development that retains the visual impression <strong>of</strong> the natural level <strong>of</strong> a site, as seen from thestreet or other public place, or from an adjoining property.The applicant proposes a finished floor level for the proposed dwelling at the same level as theexisting house being 36.1 metres AHD. The applicant proposes to construct a retaining wallalong the northern side and western rear boundaries with a top <strong>of</strong> wall height <strong>of</strong> 35.95 metresAHD. This proposed retaining wall does not exceed more than 500 metres along the majority<strong>of</strong> the two boundaries except for approximately the last 8 metres towards the rear boundarywhere it reaches a maximum height <strong>of</strong> 700mm along the northern side boundary.It is considered that the proposed variation is minor and that the vast majority <strong>of</strong> the levelsnominated for the site retain the visual impression <strong>of</strong> the natural level as seen from the streetand from the two adjoining properties.The proposed levels <strong>of</strong> fill and retaining along the side and rear boundary will also preventoverlooking from the proposed west and north facing windows <strong>of</strong> the new dwelling which will beconstructed to a similar level once a 1.8 metre dividing fence is placed above it.Overall in view <strong>of</strong> the above comments, it is considered that the proposed height <strong>of</strong> fill adjacentto the northern side boundary is acceptable and does satisfy with the performance criteria forthe following reason:-• retains the visual impression <strong>of</strong> the natural level <strong>of</strong> the site as seen from the street andadjoining properties as the majority <strong>of</strong> the retaining along the boundaries is below500mm.H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\JUNE 2012\B DV.DOCX 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!