12.07.2015 Views

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNCIL MINUTESTUESDAY 26 JUNE 2012POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was assessedagainst the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Residential Design Codes (R Codes), <strong>Town</strong> Planning SchemeNo.1, and the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:There are no financial implications related to this report.STRATEGIC DIRECTION:Consideration <strong>of</strong> this application is consistent with the <strong>Town</strong>'s Strategic Plan 2009-2020 for thepriority area 'Planning for our Community'.COMMUNITY CONSULTATION:This matter has been assessed under the Community Consultation Policy. The requirementsfor consultation have been satisfied under the statutory provisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> PlanningScheme.ATTACHMENTS:1. Summary <strong>of</strong> applicant's justification and neighbour's objectionsADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION:That, in accordance with Part 4 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme No. 1,<strong>Council</strong> APPROVES the application for a two storey dwelling submitted by Webb & Brown-Neaves Homes at Lot 570 (No. 67) Essex Street, Wembley, as shown on the amended plansdated 12 June 2012 subject to the following conditions:(i)the surface finish <strong>of</strong> boundary walls facing the adjoining property to the south to berendered, painted or face brickwork to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>.Committee Meeting 19 June 2012During discussion, Members raised concern with regard to the impact <strong>of</strong> the boundary wall onthe streetscape and the amenity <strong>of</strong> the adjoining property to the south and suggested that thewall be set back from the southern boundary to reduce its impact.AmendmentMoved by Cr Carr, seconded by Cr PelczarThat a further condition be added to the motion as follows:-(ii)the garage being set back 0.75 metres from the southern boundary.Amendment carried 4/0H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\JUNE 2012\B DV.DOCX 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!