12.07.2015 Views

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

Council Minutes - Town of Cambridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNCIL MINUTESTUESDAY 26 JUNE 2012POLICY/STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS:There are no policy or statutory implications related to this report. The proposal was assessedagainst the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Residential Design Codes (R Codes), <strong>Town</strong> Planning SchemeNo.1, and the <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme Policy Manual.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:There are no financial implications related to this report.STRATEGIC DIRECTION:Consideration <strong>of</strong> this application is consistent with the <strong>Town</strong>'s Strategic Plan 2009-2020 for thepriority area 'Planning for our Community'.COMMUNITY CONSULTATION:This matter has been assessed under the Community Consultation Policy. The requirementsfor consultation have been satisfied under the statutory provisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> PlanningScheme.ATTACHMENTS:1. Summary <strong>of</strong> applicant's justification and neighbour commentCOUNCIL DECISION:(COMMITTEE AND ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION)Moved by Cr MacRae, seconded by Cr KingThat, in accordance with Part 4 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Town</strong> Planning Scheme No. 1,<strong>Council</strong> REFUSES the application for two, three storey dwellings submitted by Foundedat Lot 2 (No. 7) Lake Monger Drive, West Leederville, as shown on the plans dated 17May 2012, for the following reasons:-(i)(ii)(iii)the proposal does not satisfy the acceptable development provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'sBuilding Height Policy or the Building Height performance criteria <strong>of</strong> Part 6.7.1 <strong>of</strong>the Residential Design Codes <strong>of</strong> Western Australia;the increased height and bulk <strong>of</strong> the dwellings will result in negative impacts on thestreetscape and the amenity <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring properties; andthe proposal would set an undesirable precedent for future development in thearea.Carried 9/0H:\CEO\GOV\COUNCIL MINUTES\12 MINUTES\JUNE 2012\B DV.DOCX 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!