12.07.2015 Views

USAID OIG Afghanistan and Pakistan Oversight Report, April-June ...

USAID OIG Afghanistan and Pakistan Oversight Report, April-June ...

USAID OIG Afghanistan and Pakistan Oversight Report, April-June ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix 4 – Audited Amounts, Questioned Costs, <strong>and</strong>Funds Recommended to Be Put to Better UseFinancial audits examine designated funds over a given period of time. The dollar value of thefunds audited, regardless of whether they are defined in terms of costs, expenditures, or revenues,is the amount audited. 6 As shown in the following table, <strong>OIG</strong> has presided over financial audits ofmore than $2.0 billion in <strong>USAID</strong> funds since FY 2003.Financial audits, like performance audits <strong>and</strong> reviews, sometimes identify questioned costs <strong>and</strong>recommend that funds to be put to better use. Questioned costs are costs determined not to beallowable, allocable, or reasonable, or costs for which auditors could not make a determination the ofallowability, allocability, or reasonableness because documentation or other evidence to support thecosts was not available for auditors’ review. <strong>USAID</strong> contracting or agreement officers make finaldeterminations on identified questioned costs <strong>and</strong> seek reimbursement for any questioned costs thatthey sustain. Funds recommended to be put to better use are funds that could be used moreefficiently if managers take action to implement <strong>OIG</strong> recommendations. When Agency managersagree to implement related <strong>OIG</strong> recommendations, the Agency is regarded as having agreed that thefunds could be put to better use.The following table provides information on dollars audited during the course of financial audits.It also lists all financial audits, performance audits, <strong>and</strong> reviews that identified questioned costs orfunds recommended to be put to better use since FY 2003. This information is presented alongsideAgency determinations regarding these funds—i.e., determinations to sustain questioned costs oragree that funds could be put to better use. The corresponding audit reports are listed by country<strong>and</strong> presented in reverse chronological order.Date<strong>Report</strong> Title <strong>and</strong> NumberAmountAudited ($)QuestionedCostsAmountSustainedFunds to Be Putto Better UseAmountAgreed To<strong>Afghanistan</strong>06/25/12Audit of <strong>USAID</strong>/<strong>Afghanistan</strong>'s Internal Controls in the Administration of the Involuntary SeparateMaintenance Allowance (F-306-12-003-P)N/A 3,833 3,833 – –6 Because performance audits <strong>and</strong> reviews do not apply the same procedures as financial audits, we do notcompute an amount audited for that work.<strong>USAID</strong> <strong>OIG</strong> <strong>Afghanistan</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pakistan</strong> <strong>Oversight</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!