USAID OIG Afghanistan and Pakistan Oversight Report, April-June ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

As shown in the following graphic, the majority of complaints received during the reporting periodrelated to service delivery.Distribution of Hotline Complaints by Type12%19%6%1%Solicitation of Bribe, Kickback, or FavorTheft of GoodsProcurement FraudProblem with Service DeliveryOther62%Source: Transparency International–Pakistan.Since its introduction in February 2011, the Anti-Fraud Hotline has been widely advertised ontelevision, radio, newspaper, and billboards. As the only one of its kind in Pakistan, the hotline hasreceived a large volume of complaints related to programs implemented by other agencies. USAIDOIG refers these complaints to the appropriate agency for further review and investigation. FromApril 1 to June 30, 2012, OIG referred 186 hotline complaints to outside entities, including WFP,the U.N. Children’s’ Fund, the U.N. Development Programme, the U.N. Office for Project Services, theU.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, Pakistan’s Benazir Income Support Program, Save theChildren, Mercy Corps, and NRSP.OIG also works closely with hotline personnel to monitor and address complaints regarding violationsof the Pakistan Public Procurement Rules (PPR) of 2004 in the tendering of USAID-fundedprojects being carried out by the Government of Pakistan. Allegations of PPR violations receivedthrough the hotline are handled in accordance with the procedures set forth in the PPR, whichrequire the tendering government agency to review and respond to the complaint within a setperiod. When a violation of the PPR has occurred, the tendering agency is required to cancel orcorrect the procurement. If the issue is not properly resolved by the tendering agency, thePakistan Public Procurement Regulatory Agency and the Supreme Court of Pakistan can intervene.USAID OIG Afghanistan and Pakistan Oversight Report 27
A billboard advertises the Anti-Fraud Hotline to passersby in Pakistan’s PunjabProvince. (Photo by OIG, 2011)OIG has established a working relationship with Pakistan’s National Accountability Bureau (NAB),the primary law enforcement agency in Pakistan responsible for investigating white-collar crimeand public corruption and the only national law enforcement agency authorized to conductinvestigations in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). OIG has coordinated effortswith NAB since early 2010 and collaborates with it on investigations.OIG investigators also conduct fraud awareness briefings to alert participants—employees,contractors, grantees, and subrecipients—to fraudulent practices and schemes and to provideguidance on how to report fraud. OIG has provided 46 fraud awareness briefings in Pakistan to1,183 participants since FY 2003. During the reporting period, special agents in Pakistan deliveredseven fraud awareness briefings attended by 128 participants.OIG also provides training on standards and requirements for financial audits of U.S. Governmentfunds. During the quarter, OIG provided this training to 73 participants from NGOs, 13 Pakistanigovernment officials, and 19 staff members at USAID/Pakistan. In FY 2012, USAID OIG alsoprovided this training to 13 employees of Pakistan’s Office of the Auditor General and55 participants from 24 local public accounting firms.28 USAID OIG Afghanistan and Pakistan Oversight Report
Page 1 and 2: April - June 2012
Page 5 and 6: [Page intentionally left blank]
Page 7 and 8: Audit ProgramOIG auditors, certifie
Page 9 and 10: Most OIG investigations are conduct
Page 11 and 12: site visits. In the past, building
Page 13 and 14: In recent years, OIG has covered a
Page 15 and 16: applications. In fact, the former s
Page 17 and 18: Financial Audit of Costs Incurred b
Page 19 and 20: investigation. While the employee h
Page 21 and 22: This field was cultivated under USA
Page 23 and 24: eceived payments. OIG’s review of
Page 25 and 26: program is improving the capacity o
Page 27 and 28: Under Cooperative Agreement No. 391
Page 29 and 30: Financial Audit of USAID Funds Mana
Page 31: OIG Investigation Results in Employ
Page 35 and 36: Other ExclusionsWalker, Scott Antho
Page 37 and 38: ReportDateReport Title*Recommendati
Page 39 and 40: ReportDateReport Title*Recommendati
Page 41 and 42: Date Report Recommendation TargetAc
Page 43 and 44: Date Report Recommendation TargetAc
Page 45 and 46: DateReport Title and NumberAmountAu
Page 61 and 62: 10/10/11 F-306-12-002-N Financial A
Page 63 and 64: 02/25/10 5-306-10-002-NFinancial Au
Page 65 and 66: 08/10/06 5-306-06-004-D Financial A
Page 67 and 68: 03/26/04 5-306-04-003-N Financial A
Page 69 and 70: 06/23/11 G-391-11-003-Q Quality Con
Page 71 and 72: 04/30/09 5-391-09-008-R Financial A
Page 73 and 74: 09/26/06 5-391-06-003-Q Quality Con
Page 75 and 76: The project had many successes, inc
Page 77 and 78: complicated process, and OIG could
Page 79 and 80: The objective of the audit was to d
Page 81 and 82: According to information provided b
Page 83 and 84:
OIG’s audit found that the univer
Page 85 and 86:
Audit of USAID/Afghanistan's Altern
Page 87 and 88:
and DOD PSCs in Afghanistan because
Page 89 and 90:
Afghanistan has one of the highest
Page 91 and 92:
contractor estimated that cost over
Page 93 and 94:
Audit of USAID/Pakistan’s Energy
Page 95 and 96:
Audit of USAID/Pakistan’s Road Re
Page 97 and 98:
establishing a distribution policy,
Page 99 and 100:
planned results was hindered by a s
Page 101 and 102:
Although USAID carried out numerous
Page 103 and 104:
AbbreviationsAACCAEDATVIAUAfCERPDAB
Page 106:
USAID Office of Inspector General13
show all

USAID OIG Afghanistan and Pakistan Oversight Report, April-June ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?