Predicting and Improving Dental Productivity - NNOHA.org : National ...
Predicting and Improving Dental Productivity - NNOHA.org : National ... Predicting and Improving Dental Productivity - NNOHA.org : National ...
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Years since graduation and Productivity - 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Years Since Graduation •positive relationship on productivity •appears to be a threshold of 5 years post graduation where little additional effect on productivity is seen Years Since Grad Linear (Years Since Grad) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 12 yrs of less since Graduation and Productivity - 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Years Since Grad Linear (Years Since Grad)
3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 - RVU per vist and provider productivity - 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Avg RVU per visit Linear (Avg RVU per visit) RVU Impact •RUV/visit was expected to have a negative relationship •complexity or panel stratification •positive relationship between provider productivity and RVU’s attained per visit • RVU analysis details the complexity of procedures •Coupled with encounter counts provides a better insight into the true productivity In this sample, the RVU/visit, ranged from 1.80 to 3.52, for providers who differed in experience by 25 years
- Page 1 and 2: Predicting and Improving Dental Pro
- Page 3 and 4: CHC Mission Statement Since 1972 Co
- Page 5 and 6: CHC Dental Clinic Background • 8
- Page 7 and 8: What is the scope? • Basic restor
- Page 9 and 10: CHC Responses To The Problem Macro
- Page 11 and 12: Definition Linear Regression A tech
- Page 13 and 14: Motivation for creating a linear re
- Page 15 and 16: Variable definitions cont… cont
- Page 17 and 18: Factors effecting individual produc
- Page 19 and 20: SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistic
- Page 21 and 22: Results and interpretation • All
- Page 23 and 24: Panel Size and Productivity •Stro
- Page 25: 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% N/S ra
- Page 29 and 30: Further analysis… analysis • St
- Page 31 and 32: Physical Flow of Patients • Float
- Page 33 and 34: Instrumentation • Rotary endo and
- Page 35 and 36: Groundwork for Advanced • Demand
- Page 37 and 38: The New System • Advanced Access
- Page 39 and 40: How does it help with access to car
- Page 41 and 42: How Do You Support (Or Impede) Supp
- Page 43 and 44: Measure, Communicate, Investigate
- Page 45 and 46: Daily Reporting of Capacity Utiliza
- Page 47 and 48: 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Dental
- Page 49: Effective Communication of the Goal
- Page 52 and 53: Tie it all Together • Recruit and
- Page 54 and 55: Tie it all Together • Increased P
- Page 56: Contact Information Stewart Joslin,
3.50<br />
3.00<br />
2.50<br />
2.00<br />
1.50<br />
1.00<br />
0.50<br />
-<br />
RVU per vist <strong>and</strong> provider productivity<br />
- 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000<br />
Avg RVU<br />
per visit<br />
Linear<br />
(Avg RVU<br />
per visit)<br />
RVU Impact<br />
•RUV/visit was expected to have a negative relationship<br />
•complexity or panel stratification<br />
•positive relationship between provider productivity <strong>and</strong> RVU’s attained per<br />
visit<br />
• RVU analysis details the complexity of procedures<br />
•Coupled with encounter counts provides a better insight into the true<br />
productivity<br />
In this sample, the<br />
RVU/visit, ranged<br />
from 1.80 to 3.52,<br />
for providers who<br />
differed in<br />
experience by 25<br />
years
Change language