Service Delivery Options and Continuum <strong>of</strong> ServicesConsiderations for Issue 3‐20:• Implement a systematic review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> behavioral support plans developed forstudents with moderate to severe disabilities.• Provide training and coaching by qualified staff including school psychologists andbehavioral specialists to teachers when deficiencies are noted.• Implement feeder patterns for behavioral support services as planned. The benefitsto MSUSD include increased opportunities to build capacity within schools toaddress behavioral needs, opportunities to increase collaboration, and decreasedtravel cost both in terms <strong>of</strong> mileage and specialist’s time.• Develop autism support teams within schools that include autism specificclassrooms. This would benefit <strong>the</strong> district by decreasing teacher reliance on <strong>the</strong>behavioral program for assistance in all areas and increasing <strong>the</strong> time available forassisting teachers in o<strong>the</strong>r programs, school wide behavioral support and capacitybuilding.Cost Implications for Issue 3‐20:The costs associated with implementation <strong>of</strong> this consideration are for staff time andpr<strong>of</strong>essional development. The district should not incur any additional costs in <strong>the</strong> targetedschools if <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional development and district support are provided during <strong>the</strong> schoolday during planning periods, faculty meetings, early release days, or embedded staffdevelopment in <strong>the</strong> classroom. If substitutes are required, <strong>the</strong> district costs would be $120per teacher per day. If pr<strong>of</strong>essional development is provided after <strong>the</strong> school day, <strong>the</strong>district costs would be $25 per hour per teacher. MGT cannot calculate costs forsubstitutes or teacher stipends at this time, as <strong>the</strong> costs are based on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> hoursand <strong>the</strong> method for delivery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional development.Issue 3‐21: Adaptive Physical Education.The district maintains four adaptive physical education specialist positions.The past 10 years have seen a clear shift in <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> adaptive physical education (APE)specialists. In <strong>the</strong> 1970s and 1980s, APE specialists were primarily responsible for directservices to students with disabilities, ei<strong>the</strong>r in special schools or in self‐contained classeswithin public schools. This role continues to be important today. However, given <strong>the</strong>increasing numbers <strong>of</strong> students with disabilities and <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>of</strong> educational trends such asinclusion, consulting has quickly become one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more important responsibilities <strong>of</strong> APEspecialists. 22 National Consortium for Physical Education and Recreation for Individuals with Disabilities [NCPERID], 1995.MGT <strong>of</strong> America, Inc. Page 3‐29
Service Delivery Options and Continuum <strong>of</strong> ServicesAPE consulting consists primarily <strong>of</strong> assisting general physical education teachers whoprovide direct physical education services to students with disabilities. This assistanceincludes providing information about (1) specific disabilities, (2) medical and safety issues,(3) modifications to specific activities, (4) behavioral and instructional strategies, (5) <strong>the</strong> IEPprocess (including how to participate on <strong>the</strong> IEP team), (6) how to assess students withdisabilities, and (7) how to be an advocate for such students. 3Given <strong>the</strong> budget deficit facing <strong>the</strong> district, a consultative model for delivery <strong>of</strong> adaptedphysical education should be considered. The district should consider maintaining onedistrictwide adaptive physical education specialist position to work collaboratively withschool‐based physical education, special education teachers, and instructional support staffto implement <strong>the</strong> adaptive physical education goals and objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> IEP. If acollaborative model is considered, <strong>the</strong> district must ensure that <strong>the</strong> services to <strong>the</strong> studentswith disabilities are consistent, appropriate, and reflective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> IEP.Considerations for Issue 3‐21:• Eliminate three adaptive physical education specialist positions.• Create a consultative model for <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> adaptive physical education.Cost Implications for Issue 3‐21:If <strong>the</strong> district eliminates three Adaptive Physical Education Specialist positions, <strong>the</strong> districtcould realize an annual cost savings <strong>of</strong> $206,790 (salary and benefits) or a cost savings <strong>of</strong>$1,033,950 over a period <strong>of</strong> five years.The costs associated with implementation <strong>of</strong> this consideration are for staff time andpr<strong>of</strong>essional development. The district should not incur any additional costs in <strong>the</strong> targetedschools if <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional development and district support are provided during <strong>the</strong> schoolday during planning periods, faculty meetings, early release days, or embedded staffdevelopment in <strong>the</strong> classroom. If substitutes are required, <strong>the</strong> district costs would be $120per teacher per day. If pr<strong>of</strong>essional development is provided after <strong>the</strong> school day, <strong>the</strong>district costs would be $25 per hour per teacher. MGT cannot calculate costs forsubstitutes or teacher stipends at this time, as <strong>the</strong> costs are based on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> hoursand method for delivery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional development.CONSIDERATION YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5Eliminate ThreeAdaptive PhysicalEducation SpecialistPositions$206,790 $206,790 $206,790 $206,790 $206,7903 Auxter, Pyfer, & 1‐luettig, 2001; Block & Gonatser, 1999; Sherrill, 1997.MGT <strong>of</strong> America, Inc. Page 3‐30
- Page 1 and 2:
A Study of theMount Diablo Unified
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXECUTIVE SUMM
- Page 6 and 7:
Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryF
- Page 8 and 9:
Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryI
- Page 10 and 11:
Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryF
- Page 12 and 13:
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND PEER DI
- Page 14 and 15:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 16 and 17:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 18 and 19:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 20 and 21:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 22 and 23:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 24 and 25:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 26 and 27:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 28 and 29:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 30 and 31:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 32 and 33:
CHAPTER 2: DISTRICT OPERATIONS AND
- Page 34 and 35: District Operations and Associated
- Page 36 and 37: District Operations and Associated
- Page 38 and 39: District Operations and Associated
- Page 40 and 41: District Operations and Associated
- Page 42 and 43: District Operations and Associated
- Page 44 and 45: District Operations and Associated
- Page 46 and 47: District Operations and Associated
- Page 48 and 49: District Operations and Associated
- Page 50 and 51: District Operations and Associated
- Page 52 and 53: District Operations and Associated
- Page 54 and 55: District Operations and Associated
- Page 56 and 57: CHAPTER 3: SERVICE DELIVERY OPTIONS
- Page 58 and 59: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 60 and 61: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 62 and 63: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 64 and 65: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 66 and 67: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 68 and 69: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 70 and 71: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 72 and 73: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 74 and 75: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 76 and 77: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 78 and 79: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 80 and 81: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 82 and 83: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 86 and 87: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 88 and 89: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 90 and 91: CHAPTER 4: POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AN
- Page 92 and 93: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 94 and 95: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 96 and 97: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 98 and 99: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 100 and 101: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 102 and 103: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 104 and 105: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 106 and 107: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 108 and 109: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 110 and 111: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 112 and 113: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 114 and 115: CHAPTER 5: PERSONNEL SERVICES AND P
- Page 116 and 117: Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 118 and 119: Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 120 and 121: Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 122 and 123: Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 124 and 125: CHAPTER 6: SPIELER V. MT. DIABLO UN
- Page 126 and 127: Spieler v. Mt. Diablo Unified Schoo
- Page 128 and 129: Spieler v. Mt. Diablo Unified Schoo
- Page 130 and 131: APPENDIX A: SURVEYRESULTS
- Page 132 and 133: PART A: ADMINISTRATION7. Special ed
- Page 134 and 135:
EXHIBIT A-3 (Continued)COMPARISON O
- Page 136 and 137:
PART E: CURRICULUM ANDINSTRUCTIONE.
- Page 138 and 139:
EXHIBIT A-7COMPARISON OF SURVEY RES
- Page 140 and 141:
PART G: DISCIPLINEEXHIBIT A-9COMPAR
- Page 142 and 143:
EXHIBIT A-11COMPARISON OF SURVEY RE
- Page 144 and 145:
PART K: SPECIALEDUCATION PROGRAMFUN
- Page 146 and 147:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 148 and 149:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 150 and 151:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 152 and 153:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 154 and 155:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 156 and 157:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 158 and 159:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 160 and 161:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 162 and 163:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 164 and 165:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 166 and 167:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 168 and 169:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 170 and 171:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 172 and 173:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 174 and 175:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 176 and 177:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 178 and 179:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 180 and 181:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 182 and 183:
APPENDIX BBIBLIOGRAPHYBooksAspy, Ru