Service Delivery Options and Continuum <strong>of</strong> ServicesConsiderations for Issue 3‐17:• Implement a districtwide systematic review <strong>of</strong> IEPs to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y clearly linkpresent level, goals, and objectives to specific indicators or standards.• Provide districtwide guidance to teachers who struggle with <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong>IEPs through peer teachers, program specialists, and regularly scheduleddepartmental meetings.Cost Implications for Issue 3‐17:Costs associated with this consideration are related to staff time and pr<strong>of</strong>essionaldevelopment. Work tasks should be completed during <strong>the</strong> work day, resulting in noadditional costs to <strong>the</strong> district.Issue 3‐18: Mental Health Collaborative Services.The Department <strong>of</strong> Pupil Services and Special Education has created a number <strong>of</strong> specializedprograms for students with disabilities in need <strong>of</strong> intensive services.The Mental Health Collaborative is a shared partnership between MDUSD, Contra CostaCounty Mental Health and three agencies: FamiliesFirst, Inc., Fred Finch Youth Center, andSeneca Center. This service delivery model is funded with a braided funding modelbetween MDUSD and Contra Costa County Mental Health Medical and AB3632. TheMental Health Collaborative is a clinical intervention model that provides students inMDUSD a team approach, integrating special education and mental health services in <strong>the</strong>least restrictive setting. The ultimate goal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program is to prepare students to beindependent and productive participants in <strong>the</strong>ir local schools and communities. Studentsreferred to <strong>the</strong> program are at risk <strong>of</strong> requiring nonpublic school placements and residentialplacements.Based on documentation provided by Contra Costa Health Services, IDEA is intended toensure that students with disabilities receive special education services necessary for <strong>the</strong>mto benefit from a free and appropriate public education (FAPE). The state <strong>of</strong> Californiareceives funding for agreeing to comply with <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> IDEA. AB3632 is <strong>the</strong>result <strong>of</strong> lawsuits and advocacy to increase special education students’ access to mentalhealth services. Under <strong>the</strong> California Code <strong>of</strong> Regulations, county mental healthdepartments are mandated to provide mental health services specifically through IDEA andare legally bound with families and students to provide those IDEA stipulated services.Services may include, for example, outpatient, day treatment, and residential care.The district’s cooperative agreement with Contra Costa Mental Health Services supports <strong>the</strong>district’s school psychologists who provide Child Family Team (CFT) facilitation andcounseling clinic services to students and families who require mental health services.<strong>District</strong> psychologists bill for <strong>the</strong>ir services through County Mental Health Medi‐Cal. TheMGT <strong>of</strong> America, Inc. Page 3‐23
Service Delivery Options and Continuum <strong>of</strong> Servicesdepartment administration indicated during onsite visits that all salaries and expenses for<strong>the</strong>se services are covered by monthly billings generated by <strong>the</strong> school psychologist toMedi‐Cal, and SB90, a claiming mechanism for students who qualify for services underAB3632. In order to access <strong>the</strong>se services, students must be evaluated and diagnosed witha mental health disorder as defined by <strong>the</strong> DSM‐IV. The school psychologist positionsassigned to <strong>the</strong> collaborative provide <strong>the</strong> mental health assessments, and <strong>the</strong> Contra CostaMental Health Services reviews and verifies <strong>the</strong> mental health diagnosis for eligiblestudents, thus qualifying <strong>the</strong> student for mental health counseling provided by <strong>the</strong>collaborative.According to <strong>the</strong> department, this collaboration by <strong>the</strong> district and Contra Costa HealthServices is considered a model program. In November 2007, <strong>the</strong> Contra Costa County Board<strong>of</strong> Supervisors recognized this program for its exemplary services to students.The district funding match required by <strong>the</strong> Contra Costa Mental Health Services is $930,952.Based on documentation provided by <strong>the</strong> Contract Costa Health Services, this local matchsupports five separate contracts, two directly with MDUSD, Sunrise/Alliance and Fair OaksMedi‐Cal clinic, and three community‐based contracts with Families First, Fred Finch, andSeneca. The contracts total $7,469,462, most <strong>of</strong> which is drawn from Medi‐Cal and SB90claiming.With 352 students enrolled in <strong>the</strong> program, <strong>the</strong> average cost per student is $2,644. Basedon data provided by <strong>the</strong> Department, each nonpublic school placement for students withmental health needs costs <strong>the</strong> district $35,000 to $40,000 or more, depending upon <strong>the</strong>additional related services and mental health services <strong>of</strong>fered. The data fur<strong>the</strong>r estimates a$19,000 to $24,000 cost savings per student by maintaining students in <strong>the</strong> Mental HealthCollaborative ra<strong>the</strong>r than providing education in a nonpublic school. According to districtadministration, if <strong>the</strong> mental health collaborative contracts are maximized, <strong>the</strong> MDUSD’sshare <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost would be 12.5 cents for every dollar <strong>of</strong> service. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, it is reported bydistrict administration that <strong>the</strong> cost/benefit to MDUSD could be significant, especially given<strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional level <strong>of</strong> programming.During school visits and classroom observations, MGT consultants found very high adult‐tostudentratios, typically ranging from one adult to two or three students at all grade levels.MGT recognizes that best‐practice models have a high adult‐to‐student ratio for studentswith severe emotional or behavioral challenges; however, in some cases, MGT consultantsobserved situations where <strong>the</strong>re were more adults than students in classrooms and instudent isolation areas. During classroom observations <strong>of</strong> numerous programs across <strong>the</strong>district, MGT consultants did not observe any consistent and active engagement <strong>of</strong> studentswith mental health personnel or instructional staff. MGT consultants did not observe anycounseling sessions or mental health interventions by <strong>the</strong> school psychologists assigned to<strong>the</strong> collaborative. MGT consultants observed disengagement <strong>of</strong> students and/or whole‐classinstruction in 87 percent <strong>of</strong> classrooms observed.MGT <strong>of</strong> America, Inc. Page 3‐24
- Page 1 and 2:
A Study of theMount Diablo Unified
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXECUTIVE SUMM
- Page 6 and 7:
Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryF
- Page 8 and 9:
Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryI
- Page 10 and 11:
Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryF
- Page 12 and 13:
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND PEER DI
- Page 14 and 15:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 16 and 17:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 18 and 19:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 20 and 21:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 22 and 23:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 24 and 25:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 26 and 27:
Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 28 and 29: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 30 and 31: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 32 and 33: CHAPTER 2: DISTRICT OPERATIONS AND
- Page 34 and 35: District Operations and Associated
- Page 36 and 37: District Operations and Associated
- Page 38 and 39: District Operations and Associated
- Page 40 and 41: District Operations and Associated
- Page 42 and 43: District Operations and Associated
- Page 44 and 45: District Operations and Associated
- Page 46 and 47: District Operations and Associated
- Page 48 and 49: District Operations and Associated
- Page 50 and 51: District Operations and Associated
- Page 52 and 53: District Operations and Associated
- Page 54 and 55: District Operations and Associated
- Page 56 and 57: CHAPTER 3: SERVICE DELIVERY OPTIONS
- Page 58 and 59: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 60 and 61: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 62 and 63: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 64 and 65: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 66 and 67: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 68 and 69: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 70 and 71: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 72 and 73: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 74 and 75: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 76 and 77: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 80 and 81: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 82 and 83: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 84 and 85: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 86 and 87: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 88 and 89: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 90 and 91: CHAPTER 4: POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AN
- Page 92 and 93: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 94 and 95: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 96 and 97: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 98 and 99: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 100 and 101: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 102 and 103: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 104 and 105: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 106 and 107: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 108 and 109: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 110 and 111: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 112 and 113: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 114 and 115: CHAPTER 5: PERSONNEL SERVICES AND P
- Page 116 and 117: Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 118 and 119: Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 120 and 121: Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 122 and 123: Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 124 and 125: CHAPTER 6: SPIELER V. MT. DIABLO UN
- Page 126 and 127: Spieler v. Mt. Diablo Unified Schoo
- Page 128 and 129:
Spieler v. Mt. Diablo Unified Schoo
- Page 130 and 131:
APPENDIX A: SURVEYRESULTS
- Page 132 and 133:
PART A: ADMINISTRATION7. Special ed
- Page 134 and 135:
EXHIBIT A-3 (Continued)COMPARISON O
- Page 136 and 137:
PART E: CURRICULUM ANDINSTRUCTIONE.
- Page 138 and 139:
EXHIBIT A-7COMPARISON OF SURVEY RES
- Page 140 and 141:
PART G: DISCIPLINEEXHIBIT A-9COMPAR
- Page 142 and 143:
EXHIBIT A-11COMPARISON OF SURVEY RE
- Page 144 and 145:
PART K: SPECIALEDUCATION PROGRAMFUN
- Page 146 and 147:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 148 and 149:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 150 and 151:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 152 and 153:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 154 and 155:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 156 and 157:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 158 and 159:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 160 and 161:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 162 and 163:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 164 and 165:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 166 and 167:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 168 and 169:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 170 and 171:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 172 and 173:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 174 and 175:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 176 and 177:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 178 and 179:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 180 and 181:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 182 and 183:
APPENDIX BBIBLIOGRAPHYBooksAspy, Ru