<strong>District</strong> Operations and Associated Financial EffectivenessMDUSD could realize a cost savings if <strong>the</strong> Assistant Superintendent position is eliminatedand a Director <strong>of</strong> Special Education position is created. Reclassification <strong>of</strong> this positionshould include job duties primarily related to special education compliance with state andfederal regulations with a direct report to <strong>the</strong> Assistant Superintendent <strong>of</strong> ElementaryEducation in <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Curriculum and Instruction. The assignment <strong>of</strong> thisproposed position to <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Curriculum and Instruction would more closelyalign special education and general education, could fur<strong>the</strong>r support current collaborativeefforts, and could create a greater emphasis on standards‐based academic instruction,improved achievement <strong>of</strong> and access to general education curriculum for students withdisabilities, as well as districtwide collaboration among general and special educatorsregarding <strong>the</strong> continuum <strong>of</strong> services for students with disabilities.A comparison <strong>of</strong> special education district staffing is shown in Exhibit 2‐8. MDUSD andFolsom Cardova are <strong>the</strong> only districts that maintain an assistant superintendent positionwith direct oversight <strong>of</strong> special education. MDUSD and Folsom Cardova are <strong>the</strong> onlydistricts that do not have a director <strong>of</strong> special education position. The average number <strong>of</strong>assistant director/administrator positions is 1.88 with Elk Grove and San Ramon having noassistant director/administrator positions. The average number <strong>of</strong> program specialistpositions is 8.25 with Elk Grove maintaining <strong>the</strong> highest number at 14 positions and MorenoValley maintaining <strong>the</strong> lowest number at five positions.EXHIBIT 2‐8MT. DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAND MORENO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTCOMPARISON OF DISTRICT SPECIAL EDUCATION ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF2009‐10 SCHOOL YEARSPECIALEDUCATIONENROLLMENTASSISTANTDIRECTOR/ADMINISTRATOR*RATIOADMINISTRATOR TOSPECIAL EDUCATIONENROLLMENTSCHOOLDISTRICTASSISTANTSUPERINTENDENT DIRECTORPROGRAMSPECIALIST<strong>Mt</strong>. <strong>Diablo</strong><strong>Unified</strong>4,004 1 0 3 6 1:400Clovis 2,830 0 1 2 13 1:177Elk Grove 6,003 0 1 0 14 1:400Folsom Cordova 2,638 1 0 3 6 1:264Moreno Valley 3,960 0 1 1 5 1:565San Ramon 2,901 0 2 0 6 1:363Stockton 3,689 0 1 2 10 1:284West Contra4,406 0 2 4 6 1:367CostaDISTRICTAVERAGE3,804 .25 1.00 1.88 8.25 1:353*Some districts report additional district staff such as Psychology Chairperson, Itinerant Support Special Education Technicians,Administrative Technicians, and Transportation Specialists that are included in <strong>the</strong> exhibit.Source: Created by MGT <strong>of</strong> America, Inc. with school district comparison data, 2009.MGT <strong>of</strong> America, Inc. Page 2‐13
<strong>District</strong> Operations and Associated Financial EffectivenessThe Department <strong>of</strong> Pupil Services and Special Education maintains a multi‐disciplinary team<strong>of</strong> program administrators and supervisors to review all cases being recommended for amove to a more restrictive environment. Team members represent <strong>the</strong> areas <strong>of</strong>speech/language pathology, psychology, behavioral services, occupational <strong>the</strong>rapy, parentservices, resource specialist services, and alternative dispute resolution. The team meetsonce per week for two hours to review cases and problem‐solve any issues that may ariseregarding services to students. Site administrators, psychologists and o<strong>the</strong>r staff mayattend a meeting to clarify or express concerns.With <strong>the</strong> support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> district multi‐disciplinary review team approach, <strong>the</strong> Administratorfor Alternative Dispute Resolution and Nonpublic <strong>School</strong>s position could be considered forelimination. This would result in a cost savings to <strong>the</strong> district by transferring <strong>the</strong> primaryfunctions <strong>of</strong> dispute resolution to legal counsel and nonpublic placements to a multidisciplinaryteam. During onsite visits, focus group discussions, and school visits, MGTconsultants found that some district and school staff, as well as parents, are concerned with<strong>the</strong> current process for dispute resolution, nonpublic school placements, and case review.It was fur<strong>the</strong>r reported during <strong>the</strong> onsite visit that district staff may lack sufficientknowledge <strong>of</strong> curriculum, instructional delivery, or how schools can accommodate studentswithout consideration <strong>of</strong> more restrictive setting.The program specialists are responsible for providing direct support to schools andteachers. Job duties include: district trainings and meetings related to special educationcompliance; case management and consultation; technical assistance and support for <strong>the</strong>Mental Health Collaborative, extended school year, and transition programs; litigation; andreview <strong>of</strong> cases involving conflict and California Department <strong>of</strong> Education review. MGTconsultants consistently found through focus group discussions, interviews, schoolobservations, and review <strong>of</strong> job duties, that <strong>the</strong> program specialists have limited time in <strong>the</strong>schools. MGT consultants did not find that program specialists maintained activity logs <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir time in <strong>the</strong> schools. Based on focus group discussions and interviews while onsite, itappears <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir time is spent reacting to crisis situations, ra<strong>the</strong>r than inproactive support to <strong>the</strong> schools.Greater emphasis should be placed on program specialists providing direct support toschools through school‐based pr<strong>of</strong>essional development (not to exceed union contractrequirements) and technical assistance. To accomplish increased school‐based support, anincrease in program specialist positions would be needed. Improved communications,delivery <strong>of</strong> instruction and related services, as well as compliance with state and federalregulations could occur if emphasis was placed on consistent, regularly scheduled, schoolbasedsupport from <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Pupil Services and Special Education.The program specialists could serve as <strong>the</strong> Pupil Services and Special Education schoolliaison on all special education issues, regardless <strong>of</strong> service delivery model. This singlecontact approach could improve communication between <strong>the</strong> central <strong>of</strong>fice and <strong>the</strong>schools, as well as from <strong>the</strong> schools to parents.If such a support model were adopted by <strong>the</strong> MDUSD, <strong>the</strong> program specialists could havemonthly school‐based staff development during <strong>the</strong> school day (i.e., planning periods) withMGT <strong>of</strong> America, Inc. Page 2‐14
- Page 1 and 2: A Study of theMount Diablo Unified
- Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEEXECUTIVE SUMM
- Page 6 and 7: Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryF
- Page 8 and 9: Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryI
- Page 10 and 11: Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryF
- Page 12 and 13: CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND PEER DI
- Page 14 and 15: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 16 and 17: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 18 and 19: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 20 and 21: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 22 and 23: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 24 and 25: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 26 and 27: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 28 and 29: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 30 and 31: Introduction and Peer District Comp
- Page 32 and 33: CHAPTER 2: DISTRICT OPERATIONS AND
- Page 34 and 35: District Operations and Associated
- Page 36 and 37: District Operations and Associated
- Page 38 and 39: District Operations and Associated
- Page 40 and 41: District Operations and Associated
- Page 42 and 43: District Operations and Associated
- Page 46 and 47: District Operations and Associated
- Page 48 and 49: District Operations and Associated
- Page 50 and 51: District Operations and Associated
- Page 52 and 53: District Operations and Associated
- Page 54 and 55: District Operations and Associated
- Page 56 and 57: CHAPTER 3: SERVICE DELIVERY OPTIONS
- Page 58 and 59: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 60 and 61: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 62 and 63: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 64 and 65: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 66 and 67: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 68 and 69: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 70 and 71: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 72 and 73: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 74 and 75: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 76 and 77: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 78 and 79: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 80 and 81: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 82 and 83: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 84 and 85: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 86 and 87: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 88 and 89: Service Delivery Options and Contin
- Page 90 and 91: CHAPTER 4: POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AN
- Page 92 and 93: Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 94 and 95:
Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 96 and 97:
Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 98 and 99:
Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 100 and 101:
Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 102 and 103:
Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 104 and 105:
Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 106 and 107:
Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 108 and 109:
Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 110 and 111:
Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 112 and 113:
Policies, Procedures, and Complianc
- Page 114 and 115:
CHAPTER 5: PERSONNEL SERVICES AND P
- Page 116 and 117:
Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 118 and 119:
Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 120 and 121:
Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 122 and 123:
Personnel Services and Professional
- Page 124 and 125:
CHAPTER 6: SPIELER V. MT. DIABLO UN
- Page 126 and 127:
Spieler v. Mt. Diablo Unified Schoo
- Page 128 and 129:
Spieler v. Mt. Diablo Unified Schoo
- Page 130 and 131:
APPENDIX A: SURVEYRESULTS
- Page 132 and 133:
PART A: ADMINISTRATION7. Special ed
- Page 134 and 135:
EXHIBIT A-3 (Continued)COMPARISON O
- Page 136 and 137:
PART E: CURRICULUM ANDINSTRUCTIONE.
- Page 138 and 139:
EXHIBIT A-7COMPARISON OF SURVEY RES
- Page 140 and 141:
PART G: DISCIPLINEEXHIBIT A-9COMPAR
- Page 142 and 143:
EXHIBIT A-11COMPARISON OF SURVEY RE
- Page 144 and 145:
PART K: SPECIALEDUCATION PROGRAMFUN
- Page 146 and 147:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 148 and 149:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 150 and 151:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 152 and 153:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 154 and 155:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 156 and 157:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 158 and 159:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 160 and 161:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 162 and 163:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 164 and 165:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 166 and 167:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 168 and 169:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 170 and 171:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 172 and 173:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 174 and 175:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 176 and 177:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 178 and 179:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 180 and 181:
Appendix A: Survey ResultsEXHIBIT A
- Page 182 and 183:
APPENDIX BBIBLIOGRAPHYBooksAspy, Ru