Table 4.2Main carcinogenic and non-carcinogenicsubstances in refinery emissionsSulfur dioxideВеществоNitrogen dioxideNitrogen oxideManganese andManganese compoundsKeroseneSaturated hydrocarbonsС 12 -С 19 (per commonhydrocarbons)Hydrogen sulfideBenzolSootCarcinogenicsubstancesImpactsRespiratory system,mortalityRespiratory system, bloodRespiratory system, bloodRespiratory system, centralnervous system (CNS)LiverRespiratory system, organsof vision, liver, kidneys, CNSRespiratory systemImpactsHaemopoietic systemRespiratory systemareas for cattle, which died of anthrax.Construction of new or repair of old oil & gaspipelines close to such areas adds to the threatof infection of human populations. There areover 200 such areas in the Republic of Sakha(Yakutia) alone 30 .4.2. Oil & gas refining territoriesWhile coal extraction and processing areusually located next to each other, oil & gas fieldsare typically located thousands of kilometers awayfrom the places where outputs are processed.4.2.1. Oil Refineries –Impact on Public Healthand Environment<strong>Russia</strong> currently has 28 large oil refineries,over 80 small-scale refineries and 20 more smallscalefacilities under construction. Theserefineries process crude oil into gasoline,kerosene, fuel oil, diesel and jet fuel. Many largerefineries are located inside cities with high levelsof pollution: Angarsk, Achinsk, Volgograd, Kirishi,Komsomolsk-on-Amur, Kstovo, Moscow,Nizhnekamsk, Novokuibyshevsk, Omsk, Rostovon-Don,Ryazan, Syzran, Tomsk, Ufa, Khabarovsk,Yaroslavl, etc. These cities have other majorsources of pollution in addition to oil refining.The refining process has significantenvironmental impacts, and localities aroundFigure 4.1Average annual Benzol concentrations in ambient air,Omsk (Roshydromet station No.26), mkg/m 33112010080604020025,569,260,651,230,5401101007831191511 131993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 20078 8<strong>Russia</strong>n limit(100 mkg/m 3 )WHO recommendedlimit (5 mkg/m 3 )New WHOrecommended limit(1.7 mkg/m 3 )30B.M.Kershengoltz et al., Dangerous infections in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) // Climate Change Impact on Public Health in the <strong>Russia</strong>nArctic, United Nations Office in the <strong>Russia</strong>n Federation, 2008, pp. 24-2531Atlas: Ambient air and public health in Omsk Region, Omsk, 200880 National Human Development <strong>Report</strong> in the <strong>Russia</strong>n Federation 2009
Box 4.3. Ambient air pollution andpublic health in NovokuibyshevskNovokuibyshevsk (Samara Region) is acity of 112,000 people with an oil refinery and anumber of other petrochemical and chemicalproduction facilities. The city has a centralizedwater supply system, fed by ground water.Depreciation of the municipal water pipelinesystem (150 km long in total) is 70%. The existingmonitoring system does not provide adequateinformation on the state of ground water,particularly near sources of pollution, and it isimpossible to forecast negative impacts onground water, develop preventative actions, orlocalize and eliminate sources of pollution. Somewater drawing facilities are located close to therefinery. Monitoring found significant quantitiesof oil products in ground water within theperimeter of the refinery, as well as in thetownships of Russkiye Lipyagi and ChuvashskiyeLipyagi. Water for drinking and household usedoes not meet existing hygiene norms. Drilling,extraction, transportation and storage of crude oilgenerate oil and drilling sludge, and wastewatersfrom oil extraction and processing facilitiespenetrate ecosystems, polluting them with oilproducts and other chemical compounds. This hasmany of the facilities listed above have hadserious pollution problems in the past. Emissionscontain a wide range of toxic organic substances,the most hazardous of which are carcinogenic,including benzol, carbon dust, formaldehyde andbenzopyrene (Table 4.2).Benzol pollution in the atmosphere isvery hard to estimate. The problem is that thedetection method used by the <strong>Russia</strong>n StateHydrometeorological Service (Roshydromet)has minimum sensitivity of 20 mkg/m 3 ,reflecting <strong>Russia</strong>’s daily upper limit of 100mkg/m 3 for benzol concentrations in air.However, the WHO recommends a muchalready led to salination and loss of soil fertility,and contamination of vegetation. Oil productshave been detected in soils at allotments and incrops (onions, strawberries and oats) that aregrown there. Oil product concentrations in soil inthe city are up to 200 mkg/m 3 compared withprovisional limits of 15 mkg/m 3 32 set by theNatural Resources Ministry.Risk assessment shows that the biggestcarcinogenic threats are from atmosphericconcentrations of 1.3 butadiene, benzol,formaldehyde, chloroform, acetaldehyde andsome other substances, while the main noncarcinogenicthreats are from nitrogen oxides,gasoline, etc 33 . Novokuibyshevsk is worse affectedby diseases of the CNS, sensory, respiratory anddigestive systems among children than othertowns and cities in the Region and only 8.5% ofchildren, who have been examined, were rated ashealthy 34 . Child health abnormalities are due toother industries located in the city as well asimpact of refining operations. Order No.295 of theState Environmental Committee(Goskomekologiya), dated May 25 th , 1999,confirmed the <strong>Report</strong> of a State EnvironmentalCommission, which rated Novokuibyshevsk as anenvironmental emergency area.stricter annual norm of 5 mkg/m 3 and this maybe further reduced to 1.7 mkg/m 3 due to thecarcinogenic effect of benzol and acceptablerisk criteria. This new recommendation is basedon the individual risk of leukemia throughoutlife (70 years). The low concentrations,recommended by WHO, cannot be detectedusing methods available in <strong>Russia</strong>, but weatherstations sometimes detect benzolconcentrations as high as 290 mkg/m 3 . Benzolconcentrations are constantly monitored by 74stations in 23 cities, but the results fail to showreal pollution levels or to specify zones withhazardous levels of carcinogenic risk .32Atlas: Ambient air and public health in Omsk Region, Omsk, 2008N.M.Tsunina, Hygiene assessment of the environment of the territorial industrial complex // Hygiene and Sanitation, 2002, No.4, pp.15-1733Priorities in main environmental protection actions in Samara Region based on cost-efficiency of health risk reduction., M., 1999, 209p.34G.A.Makovetskaya, T.Yu.Savirova, O.N.Gerasimova, The role of the environmental factor in child health // Environment and human health.Thesis at the 2 nd practical science conference, Samara, 1995, pp.61-6281
- Page 1 and 2:
National Human Development Reportin
- Page 3 and 4:
National Human Development Reportin
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors express
- Page 7 and 8:
Dear Reader,You have before you the
- Page 9 and 10:
PREFACEThis is the 13 th National H
- Page 11 and 12:
country’s fuel & energy regions r
- Page 13 and 14:
environmental degradation and enhan
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1The Energy Sector,the Econ
- Page 17 and 18:
By 2008 Russia had increased its sh
- Page 19 and 20:
the share of energy in the national
- Page 21 and 22:
exported, increased. However, this
- Page 23 and 24:
elimination of structural and terri
- Page 25 and 26:
• Establishment of competitive me
- Page 27 and 28:
number of developed countries, incl
- Page 29 and 30:
Although the United Nations Climate
- Page 31 and 32: industrial region of the Urals - Sv
- Page 33 and 34: 2.2. Budget capacityand structure o
- Page 35 and 36: (the Federal State Statistics Servi
- Page 37 and 38: Immigration by young and highly ski
- Page 39 and 40: energy regions exacerbate the incom
- Page 41 and 42: Khanty-Mansi and Yamal-Nenets Auton
- Page 43 and 44: the Ministry for Regional Developme
- Page 45 and 46: various other long-term problems in
- Page 47 and 48: is also associated with the fuel an
- Page 49 and 50: Republic of Mordovia 8051 0.732 68.
- Page 51 and 52: Legislative control of impact audit
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3Personal Incomes, the Ener
- Page 55 and 56: than any other sources of income -
- Page 57 and 58: Are wages now the main instrument f
- Page 59 and 60: comparison of month-on-month develo
- Page 61 and 62: • The unemployed, people who aree
- Page 63 and 64: Employment in the energy sector acc
- Page 65 and 66: The share of household expenditures
- Page 67 and 68: subsidization practices in the regi
- Page 69 and 70: in power use between regions now de
- Page 71 and 72: Electricity prices for households h
- Page 73 and 74: • Steady decrease in the percenta
- Page 75 and 76: 1. The number of graduates with eng
- Page 77 and 78: As well as requiring better fuelcom
- Page 79 and 80: Box 4.1. The village of Kolvain Uss
- Page 81: continue to use solid fuel for a lo
- Page 85 and 86: either by large power generating fa
- Page 87 and 88: Box 4.6. A city at riskNovocherkass
- Page 89 and 90: In order to assess impact of thesee
- Page 91 and 92: generation facilities through safer
- Page 93 and 94: achieved in developed countries. So
- Page 95 and 96: equires 2-6 times more capital inve
- Page 97 and 98: government) should set targets and
- Page 99 and 100: networks. In 2007 government budget
- Page 101 and 102: enhancement is also important. Ener
- Page 103 and 104: energy efficiency of the transport
- Page 105 and 106: Box 5.1. Programme of the Ministry
- Page 107 and 108: educational and informational suppo
- Page 109 and 110: mechanism for using national quota
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 6.2Share of electricity gene
- Page 113 and 114: One of the major benefits of renewa
- Page 115 and 116: odies; outdoor air; rocks and soil;
- Page 117 and 118: Design and construction of geotherm
- Page 119 and 120: Box 6.3. Prospects for nuclear powe
- Page 121 and 122: consists of out-dated equipment at
- Page 123 and 124: ConclusionThe world’s nuclear pow
- Page 125 and 126: 7.1. Impact of the fuel& energy sec
- Page 127 and 128: Table 7.5Solid waste from productio
- Page 129 and 130: Table 7.7Areas of disturbed and rec
- Page 131 and 132: nature of the impact (atmospheric e
- Page 133 and 134:
Further, the economic cost ofenviro
- Page 135 and 136:
trends continued the damage would a
- Page 137 and 138:
What the government needs to do ino
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 7.2.1Specific atmospheric em
- Page 141 and 142:
money value of industrial output) c
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 7.2.4Trends in specific atmo
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 8The Energy Industry and Su
- Page 147 and 148:
eing equal) it only reflects that p
- Page 149 and 150:
(MDGs), issued by the UN in 2000. T
- Page 151 and 152:
8.4. The energy factorin integral i
- Page 153 and 154:
Canada, the USA and Great Britain h
- Page 155 and 156:
Box 8.2. Energy efficiencyindicator
- Page 157 and 158:
Box 8.4. Energy efficiency rating o
- Page 159 and 160:
41 Penza Region 116.0 -35.2 -4.542
- Page 161 and 162:
Appendix to Chapter 1Table 1.1. GDP
- Page 163 and 164:
Attachment to Chapter 4Table 4.1Rus
- Page 165 and 166:
Attachment to Chapter 4Volga Federa
- Page 167 and 168:
Attachment to Chapter 4Belovo Belov
- Page 169 and 170:
The previous National Human Develop