Box 4.2. Ambient air pollutionand public health in coal-miningcities of the Kemerovo RegionProkopyevsk (population 213,200) 19 isa large coal mining center. It used to have 17mines and 5 coal concentrate plants. The coalindustry produces up to 82% of all emissionsin the city. Ambient air within city limits hashigh concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (3times the <strong>Russia</strong>n legal limit); benzopyrene (3.8times), and particulate matter (2.1 times) 20 .Children living in the worst polluted citydistrict had an abnormally high rate ofrespiratory diseases. In Leninsk-Kuznetskiy(population 105,400) there is a proven excessillnesses and 4-19% 18 of mortality. KemerovoRegion saw a 19.4% increase rise in diseaseincidence and 19.7% increase in mortality in1993–2006 (Box 4.2).People living in mining cities have tocope with unemployment and labor marketdifficulties in addition to environmentalpollution, raising stress levels and putting morepressure on public health.Liquidation of underground miningfacilities also endangers drinking water sources,and preventive steps were taken at 51 mines,which closed in 1994–1998, in order to protectwater sources 22 . Technical wear of equipment,and inadequate repair and reconstruction workon waste treatment facilities leads to methaneand carbon emissions from underground mineworkings and rising levels of ground water 23 .Closure of unprofitable workings in PermTerritory, another <strong>Russia</strong>n coal mining region, ledto atmospheric pollution by mine dust and coalash, as well as worsening of drinking waterof premature deliveries, fetal deaths, childhealth anomalies and infant disease comparedwith the regional average 21 .Pollution in Kemerovo’s cites is alsocaused by dust rising from polluted soils,which makes land reclamation highlyimportant. According to the regionalDepartment of Natural Resources andEnvironment, there are more than 180,000hectares of unreclaimed land in Kemerovo,which is 10 times more than the nationalaverage As much as 20-27% of all land inKiselevsk and Prokopyevsk is unreclaimed.Coal mining companies sometime try to avoidresponsibility for land reclamation.quality. Pollution in the region causedaggravation of bronchial asthma among children,forcing increased spending on treatment 24 .Owners of ageing coal-powered powerstations are trying to reduce environmentalimpact by full or partial changeover to naturalgas, which lowers emissions of solids, sulfphurand nitrogen dioxides, and lowers ash and slagwaste, but this approach looks unpromisingbecause increasing natural gas prices make gasgeneratedpower uncompetitive. Investments toupgrade outdated facilities also lack feasibility asa way of solving environmental issues, due toshort residual life periods. The proposal, instead,is that all fuel oil and coal-dust boilers, which aretransferred to natural gas, should undergo workto reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. Such work(reduction of excessive air input, offstoichiometriccombustion, simplified two-stagecombustion) does not require capitalinvestments and, if properly executed, does notworsen boiler performance. Boilers that will18V.A.Zenkov, Hygiene problems in Kuzbass mining towns, abstract of a thesis for a Doctor of Medicine degree, 2000, p.4219<strong>Russia</strong>'s Regions. Main social and economic indexes of <strong>Russia</strong>n cities. 2008. Statistical Digest / Rosstat, M. 2008, 378 p.20<strong>Report</strong> on the sanitary and epidemiological situation in Kemerovo Region in 2005, Kemerovo, 200621Yu.F.Kaznin, A.S.Krasnov, Health status of pregnant women and new-born children in cities with developed coal industry //Environmental issues of the development of Kuzbass coal deposits, Novokuznetsk, 1991, p.43.22A.Ye.Agapov. Analysis of work during liquidation of unfeasible coal mines and open pits in 2008 // Coal, 2009, No.3, p.3-6.23V.A.Zenkov, E.A.Lodza, Sanitary and epidemiological support for restructuring of the Kuzbass coal industry // Public health and humanenvironment, 2001, No.9, pp. 32-3424S.V.Farnosova, Hygiene assessment of the combined influence of social and industrial factors on contraction and course of childbronchial asthma (based on data from depressive coal mining regions in Perm Territory), abstract of a thesis for a Doctor of Medicinedegree, Perm, 200878 National Human Development <strong>Report</strong> in the <strong>Russia</strong>n Federation 2009
continue to use solid fuel for a long period oftime (mainly coal power stations in Siberia andeastern <strong>Russia</strong>) require a different approach.Choice of the reconstruction option should bebased on the expected period of service 25 .Combustion of coal in fluidized-bed boilers willenable use of low-grade and high-ash coals.Improvement of fuel quality – enrichment,pelletizing and other approaches – is also anoption.Any project for construction orreconstruction of coal-fired power plants shouldbe approached with great caution, takingmaximum account of existing environmentalconditions and proposed new environmentalstandards of WHO, the European Commissionand other international organizations.Installation of coal-fired combined heat & powerplants (CHPs) near cities has already elicitedprotests: planned construction of a CHP nearZheleznogorsk in Krasnoyarsk Territory isopposed by local people who fear pollution of airand underground water 26 .In the north-western Kaliningrad Region,local people have voted against construction of aCHP using coal from Kemerovo near the town ofSvetly 27 .There is an investment program fortransferring large fuel-fired condensing powerplants (CPPs) and CHPs from coal to naturalgas. The stations concerned are:Verkhnetagilskaya (generator #12), Kashirskaya(generator #3), Troitskaya, Serovskaya, andKharanorskaya. However, plannedchangeovers of Shaturskaya-5, Ryazanskaya,Novo-Bogoslovskaya, and Verkhnetagilskayafrom coal to gas have been delayed.Cherepetskaya,Novocherkasskaya,Astrakhanskaya, Omskaya stations will burnmore coal and proposals have been made forconstruction of large coal-powered CPPS andCHPs in Murmansk, Tambov, Rostov, Volgograd,Sverdlovsk, Irkutsk, Kemerovo, Novosibirsk,Omsk, Tomsk, Sakhalin Regions, the Republicsof Mordovia, Buryatia, and Udmurtia, Trans-Baikal and Khabarovsk Territories.There is currently a freeze onconstruction of thermal power plants (TPPs,which are smaller coal-fired power stations),including the Medvezhyegorskaya,Novgorodskaya, Kaluzhskaya, Petrovskaya andAbagurskaya projects, in favor of expansion ofexisting TPPs (Smolenskaya, Reftinskaya,Yuzhno-Uralskaya and Kemerovo). This isundoubtedly positive from an environmentalviewpoint. Commissioning of a coal-poweredunit at an existing TPP takes 3-4 years, whileconstruction of greenfield stations requires 5-8 years. So that mass development of coalfiredgeneration will not go ahead in <strong>Russia</strong>before 2020–2025 at the soonest. Applicationof modern coal combustion technologies maybe feasible by that time.4.1.3. Oil & gas pipelinesand threats of highlydangerous infections dueto climate warmingin Arctic regionsGlobal warming, particularly in Arcticregions, brings a threat of deformation inpermafrost zones. The total permafrost zone isexpected to shrink by 10-12% in the coming 20-25 years and its border will move by 150-200km to the north-west 28,29 . Risk of damage toinfrastructure located in the permafrost zonehas been assessed using a permafrost hazardindex, which is highest in Chukotka, the coastalarea of the Karsk Sea, in Novaya Zemlya and inthe northern part of European <strong>Russia</strong>. Globalwarming creates a real risk of damage to burial25A.G.Tumanovskiy, V.R.Kotler, Possible environmental solutions for heat & power plants // Teploenergetika, 2007, No.6, pp. 5-1126www.eprussia.ru/epr/98/7259)/27www.rambler.ru/news/0/0/1103450528O.A.Anisimov, M.A.Byelolutskaya, Assessment of the impact of climate change and permafrost degradation on infrastructure innorthern regions of <strong>Russia</strong> // Meteorology and Hydrology, 2002, No.6, pp. 15-2229O.A.Anisimov, A.A.Velichko, P.F.Demchenko, A.V.Yeliseev, I.I.Mokhov, V.P.Nechayev, Climate change impact on the permafrost in thepast, present and future // Atmosphere and Ocean Physics, 2004, No.1 (volume 38), pp. 25-3979
- Page 1 and 2:
National Human Development Reportin
- Page 3 and 4:
National Human Development Reportin
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors express
- Page 7 and 8:
Dear Reader,You have before you the
- Page 9 and 10:
PREFACEThis is the 13 th National H
- Page 11 and 12:
country’s fuel & energy regions r
- Page 13 and 14:
environmental degradation and enhan
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1The Energy Sector,the Econ
- Page 17 and 18:
By 2008 Russia had increased its sh
- Page 19 and 20:
the share of energy in the national
- Page 21 and 22:
exported, increased. However, this
- Page 23 and 24:
elimination of structural and terri
- Page 25 and 26:
• Establishment of competitive me
- Page 27 and 28:
number of developed countries, incl
- Page 29 and 30: Although the United Nations Climate
- Page 31 and 32: industrial region of the Urals - Sv
- Page 33 and 34: 2.2. Budget capacityand structure o
- Page 35 and 36: (the Federal State Statistics Servi
- Page 37 and 38: Immigration by young and highly ski
- Page 39 and 40: energy regions exacerbate the incom
- Page 41 and 42: Khanty-Mansi and Yamal-Nenets Auton
- Page 43 and 44: the Ministry for Regional Developme
- Page 45 and 46: various other long-term problems in
- Page 47 and 48: is also associated with the fuel an
- Page 49 and 50: Republic of Mordovia 8051 0.732 68.
- Page 51 and 52: Legislative control of impact audit
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3Personal Incomes, the Ener
- Page 55 and 56: than any other sources of income -
- Page 57 and 58: Are wages now the main instrument f
- Page 59 and 60: comparison of month-on-month develo
- Page 61 and 62: • The unemployed, people who aree
- Page 63 and 64: Employment in the energy sector acc
- Page 65 and 66: The share of household expenditures
- Page 67 and 68: subsidization practices in the regi
- Page 69 and 70: in power use between regions now de
- Page 71 and 72: Electricity prices for households h
- Page 73 and 74: • Steady decrease in the percenta
- Page 75 and 76: 1. The number of graduates with eng
- Page 77 and 78: As well as requiring better fuelcom
- Page 79: Box 4.1. The village of Kolvain Uss
- Page 83 and 84: Box 4.3. Ambient air pollution andp
- Page 85 and 86: either by large power generating fa
- Page 87 and 88: Box 4.6. A city at riskNovocherkass
- Page 89 and 90: In order to assess impact of thesee
- Page 91 and 92: generation facilities through safer
- Page 93 and 94: achieved in developed countries. So
- Page 95 and 96: equires 2-6 times more capital inve
- Page 97 and 98: government) should set targets and
- Page 99 and 100: networks. In 2007 government budget
- Page 101 and 102: enhancement is also important. Ener
- Page 103 and 104: energy efficiency of the transport
- Page 105 and 106: Box 5.1. Programme of the Ministry
- Page 107 and 108: educational and informational suppo
- Page 109 and 110: mechanism for using national quota
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 6.2Share of electricity gene
- Page 113 and 114: One of the major benefits of renewa
- Page 115 and 116: odies; outdoor air; rocks and soil;
- Page 117 and 118: Design and construction of geotherm
- Page 119 and 120: Box 6.3. Prospects for nuclear powe
- Page 121 and 122: consists of out-dated equipment at
- Page 123 and 124: ConclusionThe world’s nuclear pow
- Page 125 and 126: 7.1. Impact of the fuel& energy sec
- Page 127 and 128: Table 7.5Solid waste from productio
- Page 129 and 130: Table 7.7Areas of disturbed and rec
- Page 131 and 132:
nature of the impact (atmospheric e
- Page 133 and 134:
Further, the economic cost ofenviro
- Page 135 and 136:
trends continued the damage would a
- Page 137 and 138:
What the government needs to do ino
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 7.2.1Specific atmospheric em
- Page 141 and 142:
money value of industrial output) c
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 7.2.4Trends in specific atmo
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 8The Energy Industry and Su
- Page 147 and 148:
eing equal) it only reflects that p
- Page 149 and 150:
(MDGs), issued by the UN in 2000. T
- Page 151 and 152:
8.4. The energy factorin integral i
- Page 153 and 154:
Canada, the USA and Great Britain h
- Page 155 and 156:
Box 8.2. Energy efficiencyindicator
- Page 157 and 158:
Box 8.4. Energy efficiency rating o
- Page 159 and 160:
41 Penza Region 116.0 -35.2 -4.542
- Page 161 and 162:
Appendix to Chapter 1Table 1.1. GDP
- Page 163 and 164:
Attachment to Chapter 4Table 4.1Rus
- Page 165 and 166:
Attachment to Chapter 4Volga Federa
- Page 167 and 168:
Attachment to Chapter 4Belovo Belov
- Page 169 and 170:
The previous National Human Develop