Chapter 4The Energy Sector and Public HealthBurgeoning demand for energy in thelate 20 th and start of the 21 st centuries has ledto a dramatic increase in crude oil & gasproduction, which, in turn, led to increasingdischarge of pollutants into the environment.Volumes of waste water created by theelectricity industry have been growing since2004, and atmospheric emissions from fuelfiredpower stations is growing faster than theirelectricity output. Decline of pollution levels inthe metallurgy and chemical industries hascaused the share of the fuel & energy sector inoverall pollution to rise by almost 10% in recentyears. Share of the sector in total industrialpollution is 56%, including 58% of solid wasteand 23% of waste water.Problems from use of coal top theagenda when assessing environmental impactsof the fuel & energy sector. Current nationalstructure of primary fuel use reflects theprolonged ‘gas pause’: the share of coal in thenational fuel balance is only 18%, while that ofoil is 21% and natural gas dominates with ashare of 52%. Annual consumption of coal bythe power industry is rising more slowly in<strong>Russia</strong> than in the rest of the world at present,but large increase in the share of coal in thenational energy balance is expected, reflectinghuge <strong>Russia</strong>n deposits of coal, especially in theindustrially developed Kuznetsky Coal Basin(‘Kuzbass’) in Kemerovo Region. The NationalEnergy Strategy up to 2020, approved by the<strong>Russia</strong>n government in 2003, calls for increasein the share of coal in the country’s energybalance from 19% to 20%. Greater use of coalshould be accompanied by application of newcoal processing technologies, which will enableit to be burnt more efficiently. Coal, as the mainalternative to natural gas, is the biggestfeedstock in US and Chinese power generating(50% and 80% of all fuel-fired inputs,respectively), and its share in Poland is as highas 96%. Such intensive coal use is possiblethanks to introduction and development of anumber of environment-friendly and efficientcoal combustion technologies.Coal extraction in <strong>Russia</strong> is growing fasterthan had been expected and rose by over 20%between 2000 and 2008 (from 258 to 314 milliontonnes). Further growth to 373-430 milliontonnes is expected by 2020. Coal will be the mainalternative to natural gas in the future,particularly in Siberia, where proximity of theKuznetsky and Kansko-Achinsk coal basinsreduces transport costs by several times.Development of the Yuzhno-Yakutsk basin inEastern Siberia is also proceeding rapidly. Growthof coal extraction is partly driven by depletion ofprofitable natural gas deposits and high exportvalue of gas.Growing power production and plannedincrease of the share of coal in the nationalenergy balance could aggravate public healthand environmental problems. Consumption ofcoal by power stations grew by 2.7% in 2008alone due to reduction in use of natural gas 1 , andfurther large increases of coal burning areplanned. It is too early to judge whether modernenvironmental requirements will be met, butWHO and European Commission directivesought to be taken into account as well as <strong>Russia</strong>nenvironmental rules. Wide public discussion ofthe issues is desirable in regions affected bypower-station emissions.<strong>Russia</strong>’s Energy Strategy makesdevelopment of clean coal combustiontechnologies a condition for increase of coal useby power stations and other industrial facilities.Transition from direct coal burning to use of coalwaterfuel (CWF, made of various quality coals,including waste from coal concentrationprocesses) 2 will be an important part of thisprocess.The Energy Strategy sets generalindicators for development, but it does notcontain specific targets for reduction of pollution,suggesting that commitment to cleantechnologies may be less than complete.1I.S.Kozhukhovskiy, Situation Analysis and Development Forecast / <strong>Report</strong> presentation at the conference, The Power Industry – Risksand Growth Limits in Times of Recession – March 24th, 2009, http://www.e-apbe.ru/actions/09_03_24_Vedomosti_Kozhukhovsky.pps# .2A.P.Starikov, V.D.Snizhko, The ways of solving environmental problems at a modern coal-mining facility / Ugol – 2008, No.9 – pp.66-6774National Human Development <strong>Report</strong> in the <strong>Russia</strong>n Federation 2009
As well as requiring better fuelcombustion technologies, sustainabledevelopment of the energy sector also needs totake account of sustainable developmentcapabilities and environmental capacity ofspecific geographical regions. Attention must bepaid to the specific conditions, in which fuel oiland coal combustion is to be increased, includingstate of the environment and public health inlocations, where investment projects are to beimplemented. Top management of the recentlydismantled power monopoly, Unified EnergySystems (UES) understood this: Anatoly Chubaisthe CEO of UES, referred to replacement ofnatural gas by fuel oil as “technological,economic and environmental barbarism” 3 . In2006 increased burning of fuel oil led to increaseof atmospheric emissions by 11%.Environmental pollution occurs rightalong the chain from extraction, transportation,processing of fuel resources to production ofheat and power. The victims are people living insmall settlements adjacent to generatingfacilities, but also populations in cities, whereemissions by the energy sector and industrialfacilities are compounded by rapidly increasingtraffic emissions.4.1. Environmental pollutionin areas of fuel resourceextraction and transportationExtraction of fuel resources is one of themain causes of atmospheric pollution,contributing 27.1% of all stationary emissionsand exceeding emissions by the metallurgysector 4 . Main sources of emissions in fuelextraction are in the Khanty-Mansi AutonomousDistrict, Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District,Komi Republic, Kemerovo and OrenburgRegions (Table 4.1). Coal-mining cities and coalburningindustries are the leaders in solidatmospheric emissions: coal-mining Vorkuta(33,700 tonnes per year), Cherepetskaya powerstation in the town of Suvorov, Tula Region(33,500 tonnes per year). Vorkuta is also amongthe biggest emitters of hydrocarbons andvolatile organic compounds, together with fourcities in Kemerovo Region (Novokuznetsk,Mezhdurechensk, Leninsk-Kuznetsky andProkopyevsk), and two cities in the KomiRepublic (Ukhta and Inta).4.1.1. Extractionand transportationof crude oil. Pollutionof drinking water sourcesdue to pipeline accidents<strong>Russia</strong>’s oil deposits are spread aroundthe country: in the Baltic, Timan-Pechora,Barents-Karsk, Okhotsk, Caspian, Yenisei-Khatanga, North-Caucasus, Volga-Urals, Lena-Tunguska, Lena-Vilyui, West-Siberian, Anadyr-Navarin and other oil & gas provinces. Totallength of oil pipelines owned by Transneft (theTable 4.1Total atmospheric emissions in extraction of fueland energy resources, 2007TerritoryKhanty-MansiAutonomous DistrictEmissions, thousand tonnesper year2085Kemerovo Region 798Yamal-NenetsAutonomous District789Orenburg Region 453Komi Republic 392Tomsk Region 246Samara Region 173Nenets AutonomousDistrict1363Environmental Aspects of Power Industry – Environmental Policy of RAO UES and its implementation – Conference speech, June 16 th ,20074Annual digest of ambient air emissions in cities and districts of the <strong>Russia</strong>n Federation in 2007, R&D Institute for ambient air protection,St Petersburg, 2008, 204 p.75
- Page 1 and 2:
National Human Development Reportin
- Page 3 and 4:
National Human Development Reportin
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors express
- Page 7 and 8:
Dear Reader,You have before you the
- Page 9 and 10:
PREFACEThis is the 13 th National H
- Page 11 and 12:
country’s fuel & energy regions r
- Page 13 and 14:
environmental degradation and enhan
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1The Energy Sector,the Econ
- Page 17 and 18:
By 2008 Russia had increased its sh
- Page 19 and 20:
the share of energy in the national
- Page 21 and 22:
exported, increased. However, this
- Page 23 and 24:
elimination of structural and terri
- Page 25 and 26: • Establishment of competitive me
- Page 27 and 28: number of developed countries, incl
- Page 29 and 30: Although the United Nations Climate
- Page 31 and 32: industrial region of the Urals - Sv
- Page 33 and 34: 2.2. Budget capacityand structure o
- Page 35 and 36: (the Federal State Statistics Servi
- Page 37 and 38: Immigration by young and highly ski
- Page 39 and 40: energy regions exacerbate the incom
- Page 41 and 42: Khanty-Mansi and Yamal-Nenets Auton
- Page 43 and 44: the Ministry for Regional Developme
- Page 45 and 46: various other long-term problems in
- Page 47 and 48: is also associated with the fuel an
- Page 49 and 50: Republic of Mordovia 8051 0.732 68.
- Page 51 and 52: Legislative control of impact audit
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3Personal Incomes, the Ener
- Page 55 and 56: than any other sources of income -
- Page 57 and 58: Are wages now the main instrument f
- Page 59 and 60: comparison of month-on-month develo
- Page 61 and 62: • The unemployed, people who aree
- Page 63 and 64: Employment in the energy sector acc
- Page 65 and 66: The share of household expenditures
- Page 67 and 68: subsidization practices in the regi
- Page 69 and 70: in power use between regions now de
- Page 71 and 72: Electricity prices for households h
- Page 73 and 74: • Steady decrease in the percenta
- Page 75: 1. The number of graduates with eng
- Page 79 and 80: Box 4.1. The village of Kolvain Uss
- Page 81 and 82: continue to use solid fuel for a lo
- Page 83 and 84: Box 4.3. Ambient air pollution andp
- Page 85 and 86: either by large power generating fa
- Page 87 and 88: Box 4.6. A city at riskNovocherkass
- Page 89 and 90: In order to assess impact of thesee
- Page 91 and 92: generation facilities through safer
- Page 93 and 94: achieved in developed countries. So
- Page 95 and 96: equires 2-6 times more capital inve
- Page 97 and 98: government) should set targets and
- Page 99 and 100: networks. In 2007 government budget
- Page 101 and 102: enhancement is also important. Ener
- Page 103 and 104: energy efficiency of the transport
- Page 105 and 106: Box 5.1. Programme of the Ministry
- Page 107 and 108: educational and informational suppo
- Page 109 and 110: mechanism for using national quota
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 6.2Share of electricity gene
- Page 113 and 114: One of the major benefits of renewa
- Page 115 and 116: odies; outdoor air; rocks and soil;
- Page 117 and 118: Design and construction of geotherm
- Page 119 and 120: Box 6.3. Prospects for nuclear powe
- Page 121 and 122: consists of out-dated equipment at
- Page 123 and 124: ConclusionThe world’s nuclear pow
- Page 125 and 126: 7.1. Impact of the fuel& energy sec
- Page 127 and 128:
Table 7.5Solid waste from productio
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 7.7Areas of disturbed and rec
- Page 131 and 132:
nature of the impact (atmospheric e
- Page 133 and 134:
Further, the economic cost ofenviro
- Page 135 and 136:
trends continued the damage would a
- Page 137 and 138:
What the government needs to do ino
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 7.2.1Specific atmospheric em
- Page 141 and 142:
money value of industrial output) c
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 7.2.4Trends in specific atmo
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 8The Energy Industry and Su
- Page 147 and 148:
eing equal) it only reflects that p
- Page 149 and 150:
(MDGs), issued by the UN in 2000. T
- Page 151 and 152:
8.4. The energy factorin integral i
- Page 153 and 154:
Canada, the USA and Great Britain h
- Page 155 and 156:
Box 8.2. Energy efficiencyindicator
- Page 157 and 158:
Box 8.4. Energy efficiency rating o
- Page 159 and 160:
41 Penza Region 116.0 -35.2 -4.542
- Page 161 and 162:
Appendix to Chapter 1Table 1.1. GDP
- Page 163 and 164:
Attachment to Chapter 4Table 4.1Rus
- Page 165 and 166:
Attachment to Chapter 4Volga Federa
- Page 167 and 168:
Attachment to Chapter 4Belovo Belov
- Page 169 and 170:
The previous National Human Develop