Report - UNDP Russia
Report - UNDP Russia Report - UNDP Russia
affordability of rising prices for housingutilities will continue to be ensured throughthe system of social support.Attraction of investments remains thekey problem of the housing utility sector.Federal Law No.210, ‘On basic principles fortariff regulation in housing and communalservices’, passed in 2004, took transparencyand predictability as its guiding principles. Butamendments to the Law in 2005 allowedfederal regulation of housing utility tariffgrowth through limiting indexes in order tocurb inflation, making housing utilities moredependent on the budget and swelling debtsof housing utility providers. Positive changesin the sector slowed down in 2006 and the rateof breakdowns in the sector rose 12 (based ongovernment statistics and calculations byS.Sivayev, the Institute for Urban Economics).Maintenance of the limiting indexes is thebiggest obstacle to long-term direct andtransparent tariff regulation and the start offull-scale investment programmes.To conclude this review of householdspending on housing utilities, the fact thatRussians spend a relatively small share of theirincomes on these services should entail scopefor price growth. However, the real situation isthat the existing system of housing utilitypayments already stretches personal incomecapacities.3.4. Household consumptionof electricityWhat are the trends and what impact isthe crisis likely to have on use of electricity in thehousehold sector? Economic growth sawincrease of overall power consumption in Russiaby 16% from 2000 to 2007, while household userose by only 9% in the same period (Figure 3.8).The share of power consumed by the householdsector fell as a result from 12.3% in 2000–2001 to11.5-11.6% in 2004–2007, so that growth of itspower use in absolute terms looks insignificant.Growth of personal incomes andchanges in the structure of consumerexpenditures have boosted the construction,retail, public catering and other servicesegments in Russia. Places where economicgrowth is concentrated now have a newlifestyle model, involving power-intensiverecreation outside the home, so that differencesFigure 3.8Annual power consumption by households, million KWh1200000100000080000060000040000020000002000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007Consolidated power consumptionHousehold power consumptionSource: Calculated using National Energy Statistics12Economy of the Transition period. Essays on economic policy of post-communist Russia. Economic growth 2000-2007 – M, Delopublishing house. Academy of National Economy, 2008.66 National Human Development Report in the Russian Federation 2009
in power use between regions now depend oneconomic development and householdincomes as well as climate conditions. While thenational average share of power use byhouseholds in 2000–2007 was 11.9%, figures forMoscow, St.Petersburg and Krasnodar Territory(where Black Sea resorts are concentrated) weremuch higher at 23.5%, 19.9% and 22.2%,respectively. The household share in Rostovregion, which also has a Black Sea 13 coastline,was also high at 18.7%. These regions should beviewed as trendsetters, with service economiesand high population density. By contrast, thelowest household shares in power use are inmain raw-material regions of Siberia, where theeconomy is industry-focused: KrasnoyarskTerritory, 5.8%; Kemerovo Region, 7.3%; IrkutskRegion, 7.5%. The household power share isalso low (8%) in Russia’s main oil producingarea, Tyumen Region with its autonomousdistricts. Large and relatively well-developedregions with diversified economies andregional capitals with over one millioninhabitants are in a middle position, eitherequal to or slightly below the national average:Samara Region, 12%; Sverdlovsk Region, 10%;Chelyabinsk region, 9.8%; Republic of Tatarstan,9.7%. Two regions in the European part ofRussia, with cities of more than one millionpeople and a mixture of initial processing 14 andimport-substitution industries – NizhnyNovgorod and Volgograd – are on oppositesides of the national average with indicators of13.1% and 9.3%, but are closer to the ‘middleclass’regions. Moscow Region (13.8%) andLeningrad Region (9.8%) are in roughly thesame situation.Strong growth of power consumptionby the housing sector makes installation ofnew generating capacity an urgent task insome regions. The share of powerconsumption by households in MoscowRegion has risen from 12.2% to 17.0% (Figure3.9), closely approaching the four regions,which have shown highest shares ofhouseholds in total power (the cities ofMoscow and St.Petersburg, Krasnodar Territoryand Rostov Region). Peak loads related tohousehold consumption are becoming aserious problem for these regions.The trends, which emerged during theperiod of economic growth, will remaindominant. The 10% increase of householdpower tariffs planned for 2010 will raise theshare of household spending on housingutilities in a context of declining real incomes,but the impact for low-income groups will bemitigated by social support. Better-offFigure 3.9Share of households in total power consumption in Moscow and Moscow Region25.023.6 23.0 23.9 23.9 23.8 22.823.4 23.920.015.014.012.5 12.2 12.3 12.514.9 15.117.010.012.3 12.3 12.1 11.8 11.5 11.6 11.5 11.65.00.02000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007Russian Federation Moscow Region MoscowSource: Calculated using National Energy Statistics13Classification of Russia’s regions is in accordance with the Special Atlas of Russia’s Regions, N.Zubarevich,http://atlas.socpol.ru/typology/index.shtml.14Industries producing semi-products: metallurgy, chemistry, forestry and paper-milling.67
- Page 17 and 18: By 2008 Russia had increased its sh
- Page 19 and 20: the share of energy in the national
- Page 21 and 22: exported, increased. However, this
- Page 23 and 24: elimination of structural and terri
- Page 25 and 26: • Establishment of competitive me
- Page 27 and 28: number of developed countries, incl
- Page 29 and 30: Although the United Nations Climate
- Page 31 and 32: industrial region of the Urals - Sv
- Page 33 and 34: 2.2. Budget capacityand structure o
- Page 35 and 36: (the Federal State Statistics Servi
- Page 37 and 38: Immigration by young and highly ski
- Page 39 and 40: energy regions exacerbate the incom
- Page 41 and 42: Khanty-Mansi and Yamal-Nenets Auton
- Page 43 and 44: the Ministry for Regional Developme
- Page 45 and 46: various other long-term problems in
- Page 47 and 48: is also associated with the fuel an
- Page 49 and 50: Republic of Mordovia 8051 0.732 68.
- Page 51 and 52: Legislative control of impact audit
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3Personal Incomes, the Ener
- Page 55 and 56: than any other sources of income -
- Page 57 and 58: Are wages now the main instrument f
- Page 59 and 60: comparison of month-on-month develo
- Page 61 and 62: • The unemployed, people who aree
- Page 63 and 64: Employment in the energy sector acc
- Page 65 and 66: The share of household expenditures
- Page 67: subsidization practices in the regi
- Page 71 and 72: Electricity prices for households h
- Page 73 and 74: • Steady decrease in the percenta
- Page 75 and 76: 1. The number of graduates with eng
- Page 77 and 78: As well as requiring better fuelcom
- Page 79 and 80: Box 4.1. The village of Kolvain Uss
- Page 81 and 82: continue to use solid fuel for a lo
- Page 83 and 84: Box 4.3. Ambient air pollution andp
- Page 85 and 86: either by large power generating fa
- Page 87 and 88: Box 4.6. A city at riskNovocherkass
- Page 89 and 90: In order to assess impact of thesee
- Page 91 and 92: generation facilities through safer
- Page 93 and 94: achieved in developed countries. So
- Page 95 and 96: equires 2-6 times more capital inve
- Page 97 and 98: government) should set targets and
- Page 99 and 100: networks. In 2007 government budget
- Page 101 and 102: enhancement is also important. Ener
- Page 103 and 104: energy efficiency of the transport
- Page 105 and 106: Box 5.1. Programme of the Ministry
- Page 107 and 108: educational and informational suppo
- Page 109 and 110: mechanism for using national quota
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 6.2Share of electricity gene
- Page 113 and 114: One of the major benefits of renewa
- Page 115 and 116: odies; outdoor air; rocks and soil;
- Page 117 and 118: Design and construction of geotherm
affordability of rising prices for housingutilities will continue to be ensured throughthe system of social support.Attraction of investments remains thekey problem of the housing utility sector.Federal Law No.210, ‘On basic principles fortariff regulation in housing and communalservices’, passed in 2004, took transparencyand predictability as its guiding principles. Butamendments to the Law in 2005 allowedfederal regulation of housing utility tariffgrowth through limiting indexes in order tocurb inflation, making housing utilities moredependent on the budget and swelling debtsof housing utility providers. Positive changesin the sector slowed down in 2006 and the rateof breakdowns in the sector rose 12 (based ongovernment statistics and calculations byS.Sivayev, the Institute for Urban Economics).Maintenance of the limiting indexes is thebiggest obstacle to long-term direct andtransparent tariff regulation and the start offull-scale investment programmes.To conclude this review of householdspending on housing utilities, the fact that<strong>Russia</strong>ns spend a relatively small share of theirincomes on these services should entail scopefor price growth. However, the real situation isthat the existing system of housing utilitypayments already stretches personal incomecapacities.3.4. Household consumptionof electricityWhat are the trends and what impact isthe crisis likely to have on use of electricity in thehousehold sector? Economic growth sawincrease of overall power consumption in <strong>Russia</strong>by 16% from 2000 to 2007, while household userose by only 9% in the same period (Figure 3.8).The share of power consumed by the householdsector fell as a result from 12.3% in 2000–2001 to11.5-11.6% in 2004–2007, so that growth of itspower use in absolute terms looks insignificant.Growth of personal incomes andchanges in the structure of consumerexpenditures have boosted the construction,retail, public catering and other servicesegments in <strong>Russia</strong>. Places where economicgrowth is concentrated now have a newlifestyle model, involving power-intensiverecreation outside the home, so that differencesFigure 3.8Annual power consumption by households, million KWh1200000100000080000060000040000020000002000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007Consolidated power consumptionHousehold power consumptionSource: Calculated using National Energy Statistics12Economy of the Transition period. Essays on economic policy of post-communist <strong>Russia</strong>. Economic growth 2000-2007 – M, Delopublishing house. Academy of National Economy, 2008.66 National Human Development <strong>Report</strong> in the <strong>Russia</strong>n Federation 2009