Report - UNDP Russia
Report - UNDP Russia Report - UNDP Russia
Box 2.1. Human Development IndexIn 2007 over a quarter of Russia’s regions (22out of 80) 1 were rated as ‘developed’ in terms of theHuman Development Index (HDI). The cut-off point forthis group is a score of 0.800 (Table 2.1.1). In 2006 onlyhalf as many regions (12) were rated as developed.Russia’s leading group of regions moved up therankings due to the income index, whose contributionto the HDI became even greater. Almost half of thisgroup consists of fuel & energy extraction regions(italicized). If regions specializing in crude oilprocessing are added, more than half of the group arefuel & energy regions. But fuel & energy industries arenot alone in boosting regional HDI levels: regions thatspecialize in metallurgy enjoy the same advantages.Moscow remains the runaway leader withHDI exceeding 0.900, far in advance of all otherregions. Tyumen Region can no longer compete withthe capital as it used to in the early 2000s, despitehaving highest per capita Gross Regional Product(GRP) thanks to its autonomous districts, which are thebiggest oil & gas producers in Russia. The reason forthis is that the formula for HDI calculation limits theFigure 2.1.1Regional HDI ratings0.9500.9000.850maximum income level: after reaching USD 40,000 atPurchasing Power Parity (PPP) the income indexbecomes 1.00 and stops growing. Per capita indicatorsof GRP are much higher in Tyumen Region, but theydo not add advantages, while the region is far behindMoscow by other HDI components. HDI ofSt.Petersburg is even farther back because its percapita GRP is twice smaller than Moscow. As wasexplained above, Moscow obtains these advantagesbecause it hosts the head offices of Russia’s largestcorporations, primarily oil & gas corporations. Somebig corporations are starting to relocate toSt.Petersburg, which will definitely increase theincome index in Russia’s northern capital. Factually,though, the two federal cities are redistributing oilrent for their benefit.Besides the growing number of high HDIregions there is also an encouraging trend of risingHDI in the most underdeveloped regions, especiallyin the republics of the North Caucasus (Figure 2.1.1).Even among the outsiders, there is no longer anyregion with HDI lower than 0.700. This positive trend20022004200620070.800HDI0.7500.7000.6500.600MoscowTyumen Region.St.PetersburgRepublic of TatarstanBelgorod Region.Tomsk RegionSakhalin RegionKrasnoyarsk TerritoryRussian FederationSverdlovsk RegionChelyabinsk RegionOrenburg RegionSamara RegionLipetsk RegionKomi RepublicVologda RegionRepublic of BashkortostanRepublic of Sakha (Yakutia)Arkhangelsk RegionNovosibirsk RegionOmsk RegionYaroslavl RegionRepublic of UdmurtiaVolgograd RegionKrasnodar TerritoryMurmansk RegionRepublic of North Ossetia-AlaniaKursk RegionMoscow RegionOrel RegionPerm TerritoryIrkutsk RegionNizhny Novgorod RegionMagadan RegionSaratov RegionRostov RegionRepublic of ChuvashiaRepublic of MordoviaVoronezh RegionKaliningrad RegionKemerovo RegionRepublic of KhakassiaTambov RegionRepublic of KareliaRepublic of DagestanAstrakhan RegionKhabarovsk TerritoryKaluga RegionPenza RegionUlyanovsk RegionKamchatka TerritoryRyazan RegionRepublic of Karachaevo-CherkessiaTula RegionStavropol TerritoryKostroma RegionAltai TerritoryNovgorod RegionSmolensk RegionLeningrad RegionKirov RegionKurgan RegionVladimir RegionPrimorskiy TerritoryRepublic of Mari ElRepublic of BuryatiaTver RegionBryansk RegionRepublic of Kabardino-BalkariaAmur RegionRepublic of AdygeyaChukotka Autonomous DistrictRepublic of KalmykiaIvanovo RegionPskov RegionTrans-Baikal TerritoryRepublic of ChechnyaJewish Autonomous DistrictRepublic of IngushetiaRepublic of AltaiRepublic of Tuva1Except the Chukotka Autonomous District. The index is not calculated for other districts as they are included in the data for otherregions.44
is also associated with the fuel and energy sector. Highoil & gas prices enriched the federal budget, whichcould therefore afford to increase funding of the leastdeveloped regions. It is doubtful that increasingfinancial transfers have been used efficiently andapproaches to solving many social problems areclearly unsatisfactory, but growing GRP has enabledthe outsider regions to increase their HDI ratings, atleast nominally.Rating of the regions is inadequate forevaluating human development potential, becauseRussia’s regions vary tremendously in population,from 10.5 million down to 50,000 people. Populationdistribution across regions with different HDI ratingsgives a more accurate picture (Figure 2.1.2). This formof assessment shows Russia’s HDI progress even moreclearly: in 2007 one third of Russia’s population lived inhigh HDI regions, while the share just one year earlierwas below 25%. In five years the number of peopleliving in regions with low HDI (between 0.700 and0.750) has decreased by 10 times and there are nolonger any regions with ultra-low HDI (less than 0.700).Overall 2007 was a successful year forhuman development in Russia. But it should beremembered that improvements were mainly due toincreasing incomes, associated with pricemovements on international fuel and metal markets.The crisis that began in 2008 could upset this trend,due to falling prices on world markets. Lifeexpectancy indicators also grew in 2007, particularlyin the most problematic eastern regions, wherelongevity has been particularly low. More federalfunding for health care, including implementation ofthe ‘Health’ national project, helped to improve thesituation. However, from 2009 the financing systemhas been changed and responsibility forimplementation of national projects has beentransferred to regional administrations. Their fiscalcapabilities are not equal to the task, particularly inthe post-crisis environment.Forecasts in an unstable environment are notreliable, but it is very likely that the sustained growthof regional HDI ratings seen in 2007 will not continue.That growth smelt too strongly of oil.Figure 2.1.2Breakdown of Russia’s population between regions with different HDI ratings, %70605464 65582004200520062007Share of the population, %50403020291815 17 2233101 1 0637 70Less than 0.700 0.700-0.750 0.750-0.800 0.800-0.900 More than 0.900Human Development Index (HDI)45
- Page 1 and 2: National Human Development Reportin
- Page 3 and 4: National Human Development Reportin
- Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors express
- Page 7 and 8: Dear Reader,You have before you the
- Page 9 and 10: PREFACEThis is the 13 th National H
- Page 11 and 12: country’s fuel & energy regions r
- Page 13 and 14: environmental degradation and enhan
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 1The Energy Sector,the Econ
- Page 17 and 18: By 2008 Russia had increased its sh
- Page 19 and 20: the share of energy in the national
- Page 21 and 22: exported, increased. However, this
- Page 23 and 24: elimination of structural and terri
- Page 25 and 26: • Establishment of competitive me
- Page 27 and 28: number of developed countries, incl
- Page 29 and 30: Although the United Nations Climate
- Page 31 and 32: industrial region of the Urals - Sv
- Page 33 and 34: 2.2. Budget capacityand structure o
- Page 35 and 36: (the Federal State Statistics Servi
- Page 37 and 38: Immigration by young and highly ski
- Page 39 and 40: energy regions exacerbate the incom
- Page 41 and 42: Khanty-Mansi and Yamal-Nenets Auton
- Page 43 and 44: the Ministry for Regional Developme
- Page 45: various other long-term problems in
- Page 49 and 50: Republic of Mordovia 8051 0.732 68.
- Page 51 and 52: Legislative control of impact audit
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3Personal Incomes, the Ener
- Page 55 and 56: than any other sources of income -
- Page 57 and 58: Are wages now the main instrument f
- Page 59 and 60: comparison of month-on-month develo
- Page 61 and 62: • The unemployed, people who aree
- Page 63 and 64: Employment in the energy sector acc
- Page 65 and 66: The share of household expenditures
- Page 67 and 68: subsidization practices in the regi
- Page 69 and 70: in power use between regions now de
- Page 71 and 72: Electricity prices for households h
- Page 73 and 74: • Steady decrease in the percenta
- Page 75 and 76: 1. The number of graduates with eng
- Page 77 and 78: As well as requiring better fuelcom
- Page 79 and 80: Box 4.1. The village of Kolvain Uss
- Page 81 and 82: continue to use solid fuel for a lo
- Page 83 and 84: Box 4.3. Ambient air pollution andp
- Page 85 and 86: either by large power generating fa
- Page 87 and 88: Box 4.6. A city at riskNovocherkass
- Page 89 and 90: In order to assess impact of thesee
- Page 91 and 92: generation facilities through safer
- Page 93 and 94: achieved in developed countries. So
- Page 95 and 96: equires 2-6 times more capital inve
is also associated with the fuel and energy sector. Highoil & gas prices enriched the federal budget, whichcould therefore afford to increase funding of the leastdeveloped regions. It is doubtful that increasingfinancial transfers have been used efficiently andapproaches to solving many social problems areclearly unsatisfactory, but growing GRP has enabledthe outsider regions to increase their HDI ratings, atleast nominally.Rating of the regions is inadequate forevaluating human development potential, because<strong>Russia</strong>’s regions vary tremendously in population,from 10.5 million down to 50,000 people. Populationdistribution across regions with different HDI ratingsgives a more accurate picture (Figure 2.1.2). This formof assessment shows <strong>Russia</strong>’s HDI progress even moreclearly: in 2007 one third of <strong>Russia</strong>’s population lived inhigh HDI regions, while the share just one year earlierwas below 25%. In five years the number of peopleliving in regions with low HDI (between 0.700 and0.750) has decreased by 10 times and there are nolonger any regions with ultra-low HDI (less than 0.700).Overall 2007 was a successful year forhuman development in <strong>Russia</strong>. But it should beremembered that improvements were mainly due toincreasing incomes, associated with pricemovements on international fuel and metal markets.The crisis that began in 2008 could upset this trend,due to falling prices on world markets. Lifeexpectancy indicators also grew in 2007, particularlyin the most problematic eastern regions, wherelongevity has been particularly low. More federalfunding for health care, including implementation ofthe ‘Health’ national project, helped to improve thesituation. However, from 2009 the financing systemhas been changed and responsibility forimplementation of national projects has beentransferred to regional administrations. Their fiscalcapabilities are not equal to the task, particularly inthe post-crisis environment.Forecasts in an unstable environment are notreliable, but it is very likely that the sustained growthof regional HDI ratings seen in 2007 will not continue.That growth smelt too strongly of oil.Figure 2.1.2Breakdown of <strong>Russia</strong>’s population between regions with different HDI ratings, %70605464 65582004200520062007Share of the population, %50403020291815 17 2233101 1 0637 70Less than 0.700 0.700-0.750 0.750-0.800 0.800-0.900 More than 0.900Human Development Index (HDI)45