Report - UNDP Russia

Report - UNDP Russia Report - UNDP Russia

12.07.2015 Views

Box 2.1. Human Development IndexIn 2007 over a quarter of Russia’s regions (22out of 80) 1 were rated as ‘developed’ in terms of theHuman Development Index (HDI). The cut-off point forthis group is a score of 0.800 (Table 2.1.1). In 2006 onlyhalf as many regions (12) were rated as developed.Russia’s leading group of regions moved up therankings due to the income index, whose contributionto the HDI became even greater. Almost half of thisgroup consists of fuel & energy extraction regions(italicized). If regions specializing in crude oilprocessing are added, more than half of the group arefuel & energy regions. But fuel & energy industries arenot alone in boosting regional HDI levels: regions thatspecialize in metallurgy enjoy the same advantages.Moscow remains the runaway leader withHDI exceeding 0.900, far in advance of all otherregions. Tyumen Region can no longer compete withthe capital as it used to in the early 2000s, despitehaving highest per capita Gross Regional Product(GRP) thanks to its autonomous districts, which are thebiggest oil & gas producers in Russia. The reason forthis is that the formula for HDI calculation limits theFigure 2.1.1Regional HDI ratings0.9500.9000.850maximum income level: after reaching USD 40,000 atPurchasing Power Parity (PPP) the income indexbecomes 1.00 and stops growing. Per capita indicatorsof GRP are much higher in Tyumen Region, but theydo not add advantages, while the region is far behindMoscow by other HDI components. HDI ofSt.Petersburg is even farther back because its percapita GRP is twice smaller than Moscow. As wasexplained above, Moscow obtains these advantagesbecause it hosts the head offices of Russia’s largestcorporations, primarily oil & gas corporations. Somebig corporations are starting to relocate toSt.Petersburg, which will definitely increase theincome index in Russia’s northern capital. Factually,though, the two federal cities are redistributing oilrent for their benefit.Besides the growing number of high HDIregions there is also an encouraging trend of risingHDI in the most underdeveloped regions, especiallyin the republics of the North Caucasus (Figure 2.1.1).Even among the outsiders, there is no longer anyregion with HDI lower than 0.700. This positive trend20022004200620070.800HDI0.7500.7000.6500.600MoscowTyumen Region.St.PetersburgRepublic of TatarstanBelgorod Region.Tomsk RegionSakhalin RegionKrasnoyarsk TerritoryRussian FederationSverdlovsk RegionChelyabinsk RegionOrenburg RegionSamara RegionLipetsk RegionKomi RepublicVologda RegionRepublic of BashkortostanRepublic of Sakha (Yakutia)Arkhangelsk RegionNovosibirsk RegionOmsk RegionYaroslavl RegionRepublic of UdmurtiaVolgograd RegionKrasnodar TerritoryMurmansk RegionRepublic of North Ossetia-AlaniaKursk RegionMoscow RegionOrel RegionPerm TerritoryIrkutsk RegionNizhny Novgorod RegionMagadan RegionSaratov RegionRostov RegionRepublic of ChuvashiaRepublic of MordoviaVoronezh RegionKaliningrad RegionKemerovo RegionRepublic of KhakassiaTambov RegionRepublic of KareliaRepublic of DagestanAstrakhan RegionKhabarovsk TerritoryKaluga RegionPenza RegionUlyanovsk RegionKamchatka TerritoryRyazan RegionRepublic of Karachaevo-CherkessiaTula RegionStavropol TerritoryKostroma RegionAltai TerritoryNovgorod RegionSmolensk RegionLeningrad RegionKirov RegionKurgan RegionVladimir RegionPrimorskiy TerritoryRepublic of Mari ElRepublic of BuryatiaTver RegionBryansk RegionRepublic of Kabardino-BalkariaAmur RegionRepublic of AdygeyaChukotka Autonomous DistrictRepublic of KalmykiaIvanovo RegionPskov RegionTrans-Baikal TerritoryRepublic of ChechnyaJewish Autonomous DistrictRepublic of IngushetiaRepublic of AltaiRepublic of Tuva1Except the Chukotka Autonomous District. The index is not calculated for other districts as they are included in the data for otherregions.44

is also associated with the fuel and energy sector. Highoil & gas prices enriched the federal budget, whichcould therefore afford to increase funding of the leastdeveloped regions. It is doubtful that increasingfinancial transfers have been used efficiently andapproaches to solving many social problems areclearly unsatisfactory, but growing GRP has enabledthe outsider regions to increase their HDI ratings, atleast nominally.Rating of the regions is inadequate forevaluating human development potential, becauseRussia’s regions vary tremendously in population,from 10.5 million down to 50,000 people. Populationdistribution across regions with different HDI ratingsgives a more accurate picture (Figure 2.1.2). This formof assessment shows Russia’s HDI progress even moreclearly: in 2007 one third of Russia’s population lived inhigh HDI regions, while the share just one year earlierwas below 25%. In five years the number of peopleliving in regions with low HDI (between 0.700 and0.750) has decreased by 10 times and there are nolonger any regions with ultra-low HDI (less than 0.700).Overall 2007 was a successful year forhuman development in Russia. But it should beremembered that improvements were mainly due toincreasing incomes, associated with pricemovements on international fuel and metal markets.The crisis that began in 2008 could upset this trend,due to falling prices on world markets. Lifeexpectancy indicators also grew in 2007, particularlyin the most problematic eastern regions, wherelongevity has been particularly low. More federalfunding for health care, including implementation ofthe ‘Health’ national project, helped to improve thesituation. However, from 2009 the financing systemhas been changed and responsibility forimplementation of national projects has beentransferred to regional administrations. Their fiscalcapabilities are not equal to the task, particularly inthe post-crisis environment.Forecasts in an unstable environment are notreliable, but it is very likely that the sustained growthof regional HDI ratings seen in 2007 will not continue.That growth smelt too strongly of oil.Figure 2.1.2Breakdown of Russia’s population between regions with different HDI ratings, %70605464 65582004200520062007Share of the population, %50403020291815 17 2233101 1 0637 70Less than 0.700 0.700-0.750 0.750-0.800 0.800-0.900 More than 0.900Human Development Index (HDI)45

is also associated with the fuel and energy sector. Highoil & gas prices enriched the federal budget, whichcould therefore afford to increase funding of the leastdeveloped regions. It is doubtful that increasingfinancial transfers have been used efficiently andapproaches to solving many social problems areclearly unsatisfactory, but growing GRP has enabledthe outsider regions to increase their HDI ratings, atleast nominally.Rating of the regions is inadequate forevaluating human development potential, because<strong>Russia</strong>’s regions vary tremendously in population,from 10.5 million down to 50,000 people. Populationdistribution across regions with different HDI ratingsgives a more accurate picture (Figure 2.1.2). This formof assessment shows <strong>Russia</strong>’s HDI progress even moreclearly: in 2007 one third of <strong>Russia</strong>’s population lived inhigh HDI regions, while the share just one year earlierwas below 25%. In five years the number of peopleliving in regions with low HDI (between 0.700 and0.750) has decreased by 10 times and there are nolonger any regions with ultra-low HDI (less than 0.700).Overall 2007 was a successful year forhuman development in <strong>Russia</strong>. But it should beremembered that improvements were mainly due toincreasing incomes, associated with pricemovements on international fuel and metal markets.The crisis that began in 2008 could upset this trend,due to falling prices on world markets. Lifeexpectancy indicators also grew in 2007, particularlyin the most problematic eastern regions, wherelongevity has been particularly low. More federalfunding for health care, including implementation ofthe ‘Health’ national project, helped to improve thesituation. However, from 2009 the financing systemhas been changed and responsibility forimplementation of national projects has beentransferred to regional administrations. Their fiscalcapabilities are not equal to the task, particularly inthe post-crisis environment.Forecasts in an unstable environment are notreliable, but it is very likely that the sustained growthof regional HDI ratings seen in 2007 will not continue.That growth smelt too strongly of oil.Figure 2.1.2Breakdown of <strong>Russia</strong>’s population between regions with different HDI ratings, %70605464 65582004200520062007Share of the population, %50403020291815 17 2233101 1 0637 70Less than 0.700 0.700-0.750 0.750-0.800 0.800-0.900 More than 0.900Human Development Index (HDI)45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!