Pokachevheftegaz – uses 88% of its secondary gas(flaring of secondary gas is often the main source ofpollution from oil production). Some old oilproduction centers, such as Frolovo (VolgogradRegion) and Pokhvistnevo (Samara Region) havespecific emissions that are considerably higher at130-170 kg/1000 roubles.The gas sector causes large amounts ofatmospheric pollution, both in extraction operationsand at compressor stations. Production at compressorstations is modest in money terms (even though theiroverall emissions are comparable with the those fromall stationary industrial sources in Moscow), so specificemissions are hundreds of kg/1000 roubles (at suchlocations as Myshkin and Sosnogorsk). Coalenrichment plants are the major polluters in the coalindustry and specific emissions in areas where lowqualityhard or brown coal is produced (Nazarovo,Kopeysk, Kumertau, Emanzhelinsk, Nyurba,Gremyachinsk) are 5-10 times higher than in areaswhere high-quality coals are mined (Borodinskiy,Berezovskiy).Thermal power production is associated withhigh specific emissions in nearly all parts of thecountry. Indicators depend on various factors,including capacity and type of power station, age ofequipment and, crucially, the type of fuel used.Highest specific emissions (more than 100 kg/1000roubles) are from coal-fired power stations withobsolete equipment (Suvorov, Myski, Verkhniy Tagil).Levels at new stations, which work on natural gas, aremuch lower at 10-12 kg/1000 roubles (Volgorechensk,Dobryanka).Size of urban settlement is a more significantdeterminant of pollution than industrialspecialization. Specific emission values in most citiesare in inverse proportion to their population: thelarger the city, the more likely it is to be included inthe ‘sustainable’ group. Creation of productionfacilities in small towns could thus be viewed astending to increase pollution impacts This contributesto formation of ‘industrial poverty’ areas, whichcombine poor infrastructure (including environmentalinfrastructure), inadequate purification facilities, lackof a skilled labor market and lack of incentives, whichcould attract qualified specialists.Trends in specific emission data areparticularly informative. They show negative changesin the structure of pollution by territories and areuseful in forecasting alterations in environmentalimpact.Pollution volumes declined more slowlythan production volumes in the economic crisisyears of the 1990s. Emissions in 1999 were 58.3%of their level in 1990, exceeding indexes for GDPand industrial production. Waste water dischargeand solid waste declined even more slowly. As aresult, specific emissions (pollution volume toFigure 7.2.2Specific emission trends in urban settlements with different populations, 1995-2008kg/1000 roubles of industrial outputat comparable prices25.020.015.010.05.00.0>1000 500-1000 100-500 50-100
money value of industrial output) continued togrow until the end of the 1990s in all types of townsand cities, except those with populations in excessof one million.Specific emissions fell in all towns and citieswhen economic growth began (Figure 7.2.2). Moreprosperous businesses carried out reconstruction, andsome of the oldest and most polluting businesses hadclosed down during the crisis period. The share ofcities where specific emissions continued to rise camedown from 50% in 1998 to 28% in 2000. These weremostly towns, accounting for just 5% of the country’surban population (the only exceptions were the citiesof Nizhnevartovsk and Novy Urengoy).However, the negative specific pollutiontrends of the 1990s were not reversed becauseeconomic growth made it necessary to meetelectricity demand by using some of the oldestgenerating capacity, and a growing deficit of naturalgas forced power stations to burn more polluting coaland fuel oil. As a result, specific emissions grew intowns and cities where they were already too high(10-100 times the national average). A widening gapbetween specific pollution indicators of the country’stowns and cities was a hallmark of <strong>Russia</strong>’s newfoundeconomic growth.Most of the increase in gross and, particularly,specific pollution during the period of economicgrowth was due to obsolete power generating units.Old coal-fired boilers were re-commissioned in 20cities in response to economic growth and the shareof natural gas in generating in these cities declined bybetween 7% and 39%, mostly in favor of coal.Maximum reduction of the share of gas was inSverdlovsk Region at the Serovskaya,Verkhnetagilkaya and Nizhneturinskaya CPPs and theKamensk-Uralskiy CHP.Specific emissions have declined in townsand cities where gas has either completely replacedcoal in power generating (this is the case in Vladimirand Tomsk) or has partially done so (Ivanovo,Novosibirsk, Smolensk, Izhevsk etc.). The same is truein cities with combined gas and fuel oil power stations,which were switched to gas in 1998–2000 (Penza,Kuznetsk (in the Penza Region), Dzerzhinsk, NizhnyNovgorod, Ufa). This reflects overcoming of thesituation in the 1990s, when regions tended to switchto locally produced fuel, even when it was moreexpensive.Widening of the pollution gap betweendifferent territories was also driven by rapid increasein pollution from the oil extraction sector, whichaccounts for a third of all ambient air pollution in<strong>Russia</strong> (Figure 7.2.3). Khanty-Mansi AutonomousDistrict doubled its emissions in 1998–2003 tobecome the biggest atmospheric polluter in <strong>Russia</strong>(this title was held by Krasnoyarsk Territory fordecades previously). Oil production in theAutonomous District rose by 37% over the five yearsand emissions from stationary sources rose by 2.1times. Record oil prices led to development of newoil fields in <strong>Russia</strong> and maximal use of older and lessefficientwells, giving further impetus to gross andspecific pollution levels in oil production centersFigure 7.2.3The average impact index (share of each industry in each type of pollution) in 1995-2004.19952.0Food industry 1.7 0.50.4 2.0Light industry0.55Construction materials1.5industry 3.7 6.3Wood, pulpand paper industry 2.921.0Machine-buildingand metal work industry 4.0 9.1 6Chemical industryPetrochemical industry2.7 17.8Non-ferrous metallurgy20.4Ferrous metallurgyFuel industryElectric power industry15.120.18.876.21.512.719.327.712.7 9.60.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.02.644.620041.7Food industry 0.9 0.50.2 1.0Light industry 0.55Construction materials1.9industry2.8 7.5Wood, pulpand paper industry 1.823.51.7Machine-building 2.0and metal work industry7.9 3Chemical industry2.4Petrochemical industry19.910.9Non-ferrous metallurgy19.67.825.7Ferrous metallurgy13.210.830.3Fuel industry37.111.3Electric power industry19.512.1 5.90.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0Share in industrial emissionsShare in industrial dischargesShare in industrial solid waste13139
- Page 1 and 2:
National Human Development Reportin
- Page 3 and 4:
National Human Development Reportin
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors express
- Page 7 and 8:
Dear Reader,You have before you the
- Page 9 and 10:
PREFACEThis is the 13 th National H
- Page 11 and 12:
country’s fuel & energy regions r
- Page 13 and 14:
environmental degradation and enhan
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1The Energy Sector,the Econ
- Page 17 and 18:
By 2008 Russia had increased its sh
- Page 19 and 20:
the share of energy in the national
- Page 21 and 22:
exported, increased. However, this
- Page 23 and 24:
elimination of structural and terri
- Page 25 and 26:
• Establishment of competitive me
- Page 27 and 28:
number of developed countries, incl
- Page 29 and 30:
Although the United Nations Climate
- Page 31 and 32:
industrial region of the Urals - Sv
- Page 33 and 34:
2.2. Budget capacityand structure o
- Page 35 and 36:
(the Federal State Statistics Servi
- Page 37 and 38:
Immigration by young and highly ski
- Page 39 and 40:
energy regions exacerbate the incom
- Page 41 and 42:
Khanty-Mansi and Yamal-Nenets Auton
- Page 43 and 44:
the Ministry for Regional Developme
- Page 45 and 46:
various other long-term problems in
- Page 47 and 48:
is also associated with the fuel an
- Page 49 and 50:
Republic of Mordovia 8051 0.732 68.
- Page 51 and 52:
Legislative control of impact audit
- Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 3Personal Incomes, the Ener
- Page 55 and 56:
than any other sources of income -
- Page 57 and 58:
Are wages now the main instrument f
- Page 59 and 60:
comparison of month-on-month develo
- Page 61 and 62:
• The unemployed, people who aree
- Page 63 and 64:
Employment in the energy sector acc
- Page 65 and 66:
The share of household expenditures
- Page 67 and 68:
subsidization practices in the regi
- Page 69 and 70:
in power use between regions now de
- Page 71 and 72:
Electricity prices for households h
- Page 73 and 74:
• Steady decrease in the percenta
- Page 75 and 76:
1. The number of graduates with eng
- Page 77 and 78:
As well as requiring better fuelcom
- Page 79 and 80:
Box 4.1. The village of Kolvain Uss
- Page 81 and 82:
continue to use solid fuel for a lo
- Page 83 and 84:
Box 4.3. Ambient air pollution andp
- Page 85 and 86:
either by large power generating fa
- Page 87 and 88:
Box 4.6. A city at riskNovocherkass
- Page 89 and 90: In order to assess impact of thesee
- Page 91 and 92: generation facilities through safer
- Page 93 and 94: achieved in developed countries. So
- Page 95 and 96: equires 2-6 times more capital inve
- Page 97 and 98: government) should set targets and
- Page 99 and 100: networks. In 2007 government budget
- Page 101 and 102: enhancement is also important. Ener
- Page 103 and 104: energy efficiency of the transport
- Page 105 and 106: Box 5.1. Programme of the Ministry
- Page 107 and 108: educational and informational suppo
- Page 109 and 110: mechanism for using national quota
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 6.2Share of electricity gene
- Page 113 and 114: One of the major benefits of renewa
- Page 115 and 116: odies; outdoor air; rocks and soil;
- Page 117 and 118: Design and construction of geotherm
- Page 119 and 120: Box 6.3. Prospects for nuclear powe
- Page 121 and 122: consists of out-dated equipment at
- Page 123 and 124: ConclusionThe world’s nuclear pow
- Page 125 and 126: 7.1. Impact of the fuel& energy sec
- Page 127 and 128: Table 7.5Solid waste from productio
- Page 129 and 130: Table 7.7Areas of disturbed and rec
- Page 131 and 132: nature of the impact (atmospheric e
- Page 133 and 134: Further, the economic cost ofenviro
- Page 135 and 136: trends continued the damage would a
- Page 137 and 138: What the government needs to do ino
- Page 139: Figure 7.2.1Specific atmospheric em
- Page 143 and 144: Figure 7.2.4Trends in specific atmo
- Page 145 and 146: Chapter 8The Energy Industry and Su
- Page 147 and 148: eing equal) it only reflects that p
- Page 149 and 150: (MDGs), issued by the UN in 2000. T
- Page 151 and 152: 8.4. The energy factorin integral i
- Page 153 and 154: Canada, the USA and Great Britain h
- Page 155 and 156: Box 8.2. Energy efficiencyindicator
- Page 157 and 158: Box 8.4. Energy efficiency rating o
- Page 159 and 160: 41 Penza Region 116.0 -35.2 -4.542
- Page 161 and 162: Appendix to Chapter 1Table 1.1. GDP
- Page 163 and 164: Attachment to Chapter 4Table 4.1Rus
- Page 165 and 166: Attachment to Chapter 4Volga Federa
- Page 167 and 168: Attachment to Chapter 4Belovo Belov
- Page 169 and 170: The previous National Human Develop