environmental degradation as a cause of conflict in - Steiner Graphics

environmental degradation as a cause of conflict in - Steiner Graphics environmental degradation as a cause of conflict in - Steiner Graphics

steinergraphics.com
from steinergraphics.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

them that she was an Arab kin and that she was ready to get killed before any ofher husband’s relatives were killed. ‘Otherwise’, she told them, ‘restore the stolenlivestock peacefully’, which they did and the crisis was averted.Over the course of time almost all peace-making institutions and practices havebeen weakened or abolished, mostly by misguided decisions or neglect from thecentre. Following the October uprising (1964), the caretaker, radical governmentpassed a resolution for the dissolution of native administration (see Bakheit inHasan 1985). The resolution was not implemented because the conservative governmentthat succeeded the caretaker government ignored it. Then in 1969 anotherradical government came to power and it actually dissolved the system in 1970,unseating almost all top leaders. It created chaotic conditions in the rural areas,such as Darfur, as tribesmen having had access to firearms took the law into theirown hands and started resolving their disputes by the use of force.The tribal festivals also disappeared with the abolition of native administration.The khalwa and the Sufi tariqa lost their magnetic force, as intertribal conflicts gaveprominence to tribal loyalty rather than to religious affiliations. With the establishmentof authoritarian rule, the popular political parties became the target of attackby such governments. They were banned and their leaderships impoverished andfollowers were either bought or forced to become supporters of the authoritarianrulers. It goes without saying that intermarriages, friendships, exchange of giftsetc. all went away with the changing of the traditional values through policies ofthe central governments.Darfur region is now undergoing what has been described as the worst humancrisis at the time, because of onslaughts by tribal and ethnic groups. However, attemptsto reinstate peaceful coexistence are underway. It prompts asking the questionof whether such indigenous institutions and practices might be reintroducedif and when peace is restored for the region. Some prerequisites are highlighted inthe conclusion and recommendations.ImplicationsThe content of the paper is based on empirical data collected from a field visitto Nyala town in July 2003. The findings are significant on two counts. They areimportant at the African regional level, as many African communities are marred byinter-communal conflicts, with no agreed upon solutions. An African conferencewas held in Arusha (Tanzania), during the period (21-23 January 1998) to look intoAfrican experiences with conflict mediation. The conferees concluded, unfortunately,that such experiences were not available in a documented form (see Othoman2000). The Nyala field research could lay the foundation for Sudanese experienceswith promoting peace and/or mitigating conflicts that might be of value to African76

esearchers and statesmen. A bigger project of data collection for experiences inall local communities will lead to documenting valuable experiences that Sudanmight offer to other African communities. At the Sudan level, the postwar era,which appears imminent, needs the undertaking of empirical research conducive tosustainable peace. Indigenous institutions and practices, promoting peace and/ormitigating conflicts, need to be identified and reinstated, so that they help in consolidating,building and preserving lasting peace.Conclusion and RecommendationsIt has been argued that in rural Sudan some valuable indigenous institutions andpractices could be delineated and shown to have been capable of promoting peaceand/or mitigating conflicts; that the prime time for such institutions to flourishwas during the colonial era of 1898-1956 (in Darfur, 1916-56). This had beenthe case because the colonial government had a vested interest in pacifying thesubjects through such institutions. Further, it was genuinely committed to humanrights at their basic level i.e. the protection of life and property and the settlementof disputes. It was also committed to the eradication of slavery.Following the attainment of political independence in 1956, however, little regardhas been given to such human rights. The overriding concern for most national,central governments has become the building of political support at allcosts. It made central governments adopt misguided policies that greatly weakenedindigenous institutions and practices. By weakening native administration in particular,many other institutions and social values have also lost their vitality andsanctity, e.g. tribal festivals, the judiyya, the Sufi tariqa, the Quranic school etc.as well as social practices, which the tribal leadership used to give impetus andsupport. In general, because of misguided central policies, war culture has replacedpeace culture in areas such as Darfur. Attempts are now underway to restore peaceto the war-torn region and this raises the challenge as to whether cross-cuttingties that held the region together during the colonial era (1916-1956) can be successfullyrestored.Some policy recommendations might be suggested in a bid to put the regionback where it was at the colonial time. It is vitally important that a milieu in whicha peace culture can flourish must be created, namely, a genuine governmental beliefin human rights for all citizens, including, of course, the rural population. It isalso vitally important that decision makers consider ways and means of protectingindividual life and property, with social attention to be paid to people in the ruralareas.As it is unlikely, for reasons of cost, for any central government to directlycontrol the local communities through modern government machinery, a form of77

esearchers and statesmen. A bigger project <strong>of</strong> data collection for experiences <strong>in</strong>all local communities will lead to document<strong>in</strong>g valuable experiences that Sudanmight <strong>of</strong>fer to other African communities. At the Sudan level, the postwar era,which appears imm<strong>in</strong>ent, needs the undertak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> empirical research conducive tosusta<strong>in</strong>able peace. Indigenous <strong>in</strong>stitutions and practices, promot<strong>in</strong>g peace and/ormitigat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>conflict</strong>s, need to be identified and re<strong>in</strong>stated, so that they help <strong>in</strong> consolidat<strong>in</strong>g,build<strong>in</strong>g and preserv<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>as</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g peace.Conclusion and RecommendationsIt h<strong>as</strong> been argued that <strong>in</strong> rural Sudan some valuable <strong>in</strong>digenous <strong>in</strong>stitutions andpractices could be del<strong>in</strong>eated and shown to have been capable <strong>of</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g peaceand/or mitigat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>conflict</strong>s; that the prime time for such <strong>in</strong>stitutions to flourishw<strong>as</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g the colonial era <strong>of</strong> 1898-1956 (<strong>in</strong> Darfur, 1916-56). This had beenthe c<strong>as</strong>e be<strong>cause</strong> the colonial government had a vested <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> pacify<strong>in</strong>g thesubjects through such <strong>in</strong>stitutions. Further, it w<strong>as</strong> genu<strong>in</strong>ely committed to humanrights at their b<strong>as</strong>ic level i.e. the protection <strong>of</strong> life and property and the settlement<strong>of</strong> disputes. It w<strong>as</strong> also committed to the eradication <strong>of</strong> slavery.Follow<strong>in</strong>g the atta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> political <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>in</strong> 1956, however, little regardh<strong>as</strong> been given to such human rights. The overrid<strong>in</strong>g concern for most national,central governments h<strong>as</strong> become the build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> political support at allcosts. It made central governments adopt misguided policies that greatly weakened<strong>in</strong>digenous <strong>in</strong>stitutions and practices. By weaken<strong>in</strong>g native adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>in</strong> particular,many other <strong>in</strong>stitutions and social values have also lost their vitality andsanctity, e.g. tribal festivals, the judiyya, the Sufi tariqa, the Quranic school etc.<strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> social practices, which the tribal leadership used to give impetus andsupport. In general, be<strong>cause</strong> <strong>of</strong> misguided central policies, war culture h<strong>as</strong> replacedpeace culture <strong>in</strong> are<strong>as</strong> such <strong>as</strong> Darfur. Attempts are now underway to restore peaceto the war-torn region and this raises the challenge <strong>as</strong> to whether cross-cutt<strong>in</strong>gties that held the region together dur<strong>in</strong>g the colonial era (1916-1956) can be successfullyrestored.Some policy recommendations might be suggested <strong>in</strong> a bid to put the regionback where it w<strong>as</strong> at the colonial time. It is vitally important that a milieu <strong>in</strong> whicha peace culture can flourish must be created, namely, a genu<strong>in</strong>e governmental belief<strong>in</strong> human rights for all citizens, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>of</strong> course, the rural population. It isalso vitally important that decision makers consider ways and means <strong>of</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dividual life and property, with social attention to be paid to people <strong>in</strong> the ruralare<strong>as</strong>.As it is unlikely, for re<strong>as</strong>ons <strong>of</strong> cost, for any central government to directlycontrol the local communities through modern government mach<strong>in</strong>ery, a form <strong>of</strong>77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!