Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

supportive of, was not being given sufficient profile, given that they collectively own and manage as muchaffordable housing as the Council. In a similar vein, some housing associations considered the strategy to be‘council-centric’ and not sufficiently partnership focused.Page 517On the Housing Allocation Scheme, there were concerns from housing associations that the move towardsmore direct lettings reduces the element of choice for applicants and may in practice be more time-consuming tooperate. There was a general concern from disabilities organisations that the housing needs of their client groupsmight be marginalised. There were additional concerns about how the community contribution mechanism mightwork in practice for people who may not be able to spend time volunteering or access sustainable employment.Concern was also expressed about how the Accessible Housing Register (which is to be retained) will work withthe new Assisted Choice approach, replacing the current Choice Based Letting scheme. Homelessnessorganisations expressed concern that their client groups needs may be marginalised, although there was some ‘inprinciple’ support for the overall strategic approach. Concerns were expressed about how ex-offenders and thefairness of the proposal for 2 year tenancies for this and other client groups, such as 18-25 year olds. There was abroader issue of how the new Scheme could reduce ‘silting up’ of supported housing, where vulnerablehouseholds were reluctant to ‘move on’ to other permanent accommodation. However, a number of respondentswere broadly supportive of the additional priority being given to community contribution groups, e.g, workinghouseholds, ex-armed services personnel, and also recognised that the current choice based lettings schemewas not flexible enough to meet disabled people’s needs.On the Tenancy Strategy, housing associations (described as Private Registered Providers in the strategydocuments) were clear that they would have regard to the strategy on fixed term tenancy matters. However, theywere generally reluctant to change their approach based on the Council’s adopted position. Whilst many areissuing fixed term tenancies (and have been able to for some time), they are generally of the view that differinglocal authority positions on fixed term tenancies make it difficult for them to adopt a single position. An issue ofcontention was also the fairness of granting 2 year fixed term tenancies for 18-25 year olds and to a lesserdegree, people who had history of anti social behaviour, tenancy fraud, etc.On the Homelessness Strategy, the general concern was about how sustainable an option the private rentedsector would be to meet homeless people’s needs, whether within the borough or outside it. The potential breakup of friend and family networks was also highlighted. This change would need to be monitored to assess itsimpacts. There was also a concern that the needs of rough sleepers weren’t sufficiently profiled.Mayor of London’s Housing StrategyTool and Guidance updated for new PSED from 05.04.2011
A key consideration for the Council was to ensure that the documents were in general conformity with the Mayor’sHousing Strategy, the latest iteration of which is the Revised Housing Strategy (December 2011). The finalHousing Strategy is not expected to be published until April 2013 but is not expected to depart substantially fromthe policy content set out in the ‘revised’ document. Representatives from the Mayor’s Housing Team attended ameeting with the Council on the 4 th July 2012 to discuss any changes that the Mayor may seek to the Council’sfour draft documents to address conformity issues. There were some issues raised (see Annex E attached to theCabinet report) which the Council considers to be satisfactorily addressed in the revised documents.CLG Regulations, Guidance and Consultation PapersSince the 23 April 2012 Cabinet meeting, a number of Government Community and Local Government (CLG)documents have been published which have influenced the content of some of the housing strategy documents.Page 518• The CLG Allocation of Housing (Qualification Criteria for Armed Forces) (England) Regulations 2012 (July2012)• Allocation of accommodation: Guidance for Local Housing authorities in England (June 2012)• The CLG Homelessness (Suitability of Accommodation) (England) Order 2012 – Consultation set out theGovernment’s proposals for defining the suitability – quality and location - of private rented housing forhomeless people (May 2012)• The CLG Pay to Stay Consultation Paper on charging higher rents to social housing tenants (June 2012).The Council has had regard to the first two of these documents when preparing the housing strategy documents(principally the Housing Allocation Scheme in these instances) and made reference to the likely direction of travelthat may follow the adoption of policy on the second two documents.AnalysisFollowing the consultation process, the Council has identified five key areas that require further and ongoingattention. A recurring theme of this equalities impact process has been the need to put in place robust monitoringand evaluation mechanisms once the Housing Allocation Scheme ‘goes live’ in April 2013. Five key areas ofanalysis were identified:Tool and Guidance updated for new PSED from 05.04.20111. On adoption of the four strategy documents, the Council will need to develop a set of policy and procedurenotes that will set out how the new Housing Allocation Scheme will operate. Accompanying this will need to be a
Page 1:
London Borough of Hammersmith & Ful
Page 4 and 5:
6. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT S106 EXPEND
Page 6 and 7:
Agenda Item 1. London Borough of Ha
Page 8 and 9:
38. EARL'S COURT REDEVELOPMENT AND
Page 10 and 11:
transfer would be premature. The Co
Page 12 and 13:
Barrett informed the Cabinet that d
Page 14 and 15:
2. That the Cabinet note and consid
Page 16 and 17:
Note of dispensation in respect of
Page 18 and 19:
Alternative options considered and
Page 20 and 21:
Agenda Item 4London Borough of Hamm
Page 22 and 23:
APPENDIX 1 - VIREMENT REQUEST FORMB
Page 24 and 25:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1.1 This report
Page 26 and 27:
APPENDIX 1General Fund - Summary Ca
Page 28 and 29:
Finance and Corporate ServicesBudge
Page 30 and 31:
1. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UPDATE1.1.
Page 32 and 33:
Table 1: Proposed use of Section 10
Page 34 and 35:
5. RISK MANAGEMENT5.1 The expenditu
Page 36 and 37:
Appendix 19.2 Where Local Authoriti
Page 38 and 39:
Page 33
Page 40 and 41:
Page 35
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
3. COSTS3.1 Cabinet approved fundin
Page 46 and 47:
7. COMMENTS OF THE DIRECTOR OF LAW7
Page 48 and 49:
proposed scheme of development andr
Page 50 and 51:
units and sets out a fully committe
Page 52 and 53:
structure for OSBL to acquire a con
Page 54 and 55:
egeneration site. These interests a
Page 56 and 57:
such indemnity agreement to be back
Page 58 and 59:
all interests. Many of the premises
Page 60 and 61:
4.2 The indemnity agreement (see Ap
Page 62 and 63:
enforce such laws as it deems neces
Page 64 and 65:
ead and taken into account in reach
Page 66 and 67:
Appendix ALONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERS
Page 68 and 69:
interests by agreement but it is cl
Page 70 and 71:
• Former Spring Grove Laundry sit
Page 72 and 73:
4.9 There is an identified need in
Page 74 and 75:
5.7 The Mayor of London has support
Page 76 and 77:
development of small shops, market
Page 78 and 79:
Council.9-20 Shepherds Bush Market.
Page 80 and 81:
Traders’ Association, individual
Page 82 and 83:
8. Human Rights8.1 The Human Rights
Page 84 and 85:
acceptable relocation arrangements
Page 86 and 87:
AnnexDraft form of Undertaking to b
Page 88 and 89:
Appendix BDated:Between:(1) The May
Page 90 and 91:
This Agreement is made this • day
Page 92 and 93:
4.2 Nothing in this Agreement or im
Page 94 and 95:
Schedule 1Definitions and Interpret
Page 96 and 97:
or land adjoining the CPO Lands, or
Page 98 and 99:
(d) a receiver or manager is appoin
Page 100 and 101:
“Outgoings”“the Parties”“
Page 102 and 103:
Shepherds Bush (no.3) Limited and (
Page 104 and 105:
(h) preparing the map or maps to ac
Page 106 and 107:
2.16.1 provide to the Party being c
Page 108 and 109:
espect of all or any part of the CP
Page 110 and 111:
Schedule 4The Developer’s Obligat
Page 112 and 113:
4.4 to consult with the Council in
Page 114 and 115:
Developer shall procure a Surety in
Page 116 and 117:
1.8 to give the Developer not less
Page 118 and 119:
2.4.4 appoint Leading Counsel and j
Page 120 and 121:
5 Appeal5.1 If the Secretary of Sta
Page 122 and 123:
Schedule 6Exit ConsequencesPart A:
Page 124 and 125:
Part D: Where the Developer asserts
Page 126 and 127:
5.3 It is agreed that:5.3.1 the Exp
Page 128 and 129:
4.3 No waiver of any provision of t
Page 130 and 131:
10.3.3 where (and to the extent tha
Page 132 and 133:
acting by:DirectorDirector/Secretar
Page 134 and 135:
Appendix DEquality Impact Analysis
Page 136 and 137:
On conclusion of the construction w
Page 138 and 139:
It is identified that the market pr
Page 140 and 141:
During the construction works, ther
Page 142 and 143:
1. The developer will maintain acce
Page 144 and 145:
Market. This will protect the avail
Page 146 and 147:
compensated in accordance with the
Page 148 and 149:
women. It would also be likely that
Page 150 and 151:
Page 145Issue identifiedDisruption
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
1. BACKGROUND1.1. The flooding scru
Page 156 and 157:
7. COMMENTS OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECT
Page 158 and 159:
Appendix 1Hammersmith & Fulham Coun
Page 160 and 161:
undertake which has an emphasis on
Page 162 and 163:
Suggested Executive Decision: APPRO
Page 164 and 165:
ContentsForeword………………
Page 166 and 167:
Members of the Task GroupCouncillor
Page 168 and 169:
The Task Group has put forward 20 r
Page 170 and 171:
Recommendation Six: Rainwater Reten
Page 172 and 173:
It is likely that external resource
Page 174 and 175:
IntroductionThe Flooding Scrutiny T
Page 176 and 177:
year rainfall event. If such an eve
Page 178 and 179:
as from information provided by res
Page 180 and 181:
system, what knowledge and data gap
Page 182 and 183:
equired. The aim of all development
Page 184 and 185:
►►►Reducing air pollution as
Page 186 and 187:
TABLE 1DEMONSTRATION OF RAINFALL AB
Page 188 and 189:
consider if it was a feasible and a
Page 190 and 191:
3. EngagementENGAGEMENT: Overview3.
Page 192 and 193:
Recommendation Eleven: Flooding Dat
Page 194 and 195:
3.16. The Task Group did note that
Page 196 and 197:
due to the belief it will be detrim
Page 198 and 199:
orough or chose to disregard the ri
Page 200 and 201:
WitnessesThe following people and o
Page 202 and 203:
Governance & ScrutinyLondon Borough
Page 204 and 205:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1.1 This report
Page 206 and 207:
appropriateness of the child protec
Page 208 and 209:
held within the period. It is of si
Page 210 and 211:
MonthEnd 0 - 1 % 2 - 3 % 4 - 8 %9 -
Page 212 and 213:
sought for children rather than wid
Page 214 and 215:
• Social workers present their ca
Page 216 and 217:
Improved Child Protection Planning6
Page 218 and 219:
8. COMMENTS OF THE DIRECTOR OF LAW8
Page 220 and 221:
1. BACKGROUND1.1 The following summ
Page 222 and 223:
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2000LIST OF BA
Page 224 and 225:
Contents1. Foreword by H&F LSCB Cha
Page 226 and 227:
1. Foreword (Russell Wate, Chair of
Page 228 and 229:
2. Summary2.1 The table below outli
Page 230 and 231:
Key Priorities and progress for ind
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
3. Governance and Accountability3.1
Page 244 and 245:
UnitMiley SteveAssistant Director,
Page 246 and 247:
Page 241Community Drug and Alcohol
Page 248 and 249:
Page 243Tim DeaconSue HaywardRoger
Page 250 and 251:
3.9 Child Death Overview PanelThis
Page 252 and 253:
3.12 Budget 2011-2012(This follows
Page 254 and 255:
Page 249Quality of provisionThe con
Page 256 and 257:
Page 251Disabled Children’sTeamFo
Page 258 and 259:
Page 253and AlcoholService (CDAS)CN
Page 260 and 261:
Page 255borough. However, wedo moni
Page 262 and 263:
able to provide greater evidence in
Page 264 and 265:
21%Organisational Profile of applic
Page 266 and 267:
Review of participation data and qu
Page 268 and 269:
New and Discontinued CPP 2005-20128
Page 270 and 271:
• There continues to be high numb
Page 272 and 273:
4.66 Removals from CP PlansDe-regis
Page 274 and 275:
Page 269• Rate of re plans (re re
Page 276 and 277:
4.69 Categories of CP PlansQuarterE
Page 278 and 279:
6%8%5%36%0 - 34 - 67 - 1213 - 1828%
Page 280 and 281:
Page 275.CPP Ethnic groups 2005 - 2
Page 282 and 283:
R e fe rrals R ate per 10,000 popul
Page 284 and 285:
No. of children 1st time registered
Page 286 and 287:
4.91Child PopulationCurrently there
Page 288 and 289:
Across the borough the proportion o
Page 290 and 291:
5. How does the LSCB Monitor Activi
Page 292 and 293:
• offer support services• alloc
Page 294 and 295:
Page 289Housing3-borough Child Deat
Page 296 and 297:
continue to be refined and develope
Page 298 and 299:
Agenda Item 12Tri-borough Executive
Page 300 and 301:
4 BACKGROUND, INCLUDING POLICY CONT
Page 302 and 303:
6.3 TriageAll troubled families who
Page 304 and 305:
The learning from this may be utili
Page 306 and 307:
9.4.3 Current/future costsCurrent/f
Page 308 and 309:
Making decisions about working in o
Page 310 and 311:
RefRisk description"If.., then.."be
Page 312 and 313:
No. Issue Mitigation RAG impact onp
Page 314 and 315:
APPENDIX 2: Definition of a Trouble
Page 316 and 317:
HammersmithFulhamKensingtonChelsea&
Page 318 and 319:
1. BACKGROUND, INCLUDING POLICY CON
Page 320 and 321:
3.4 Although the provision is sligh
Page 322 and 323:
Agenda Item 15London Borough of Ham
Page 324 and 325:
2. THE APPOINTMENT OF CBRE AND THEI
Page 326 and 327:
ationalisation or additional invest
Page 328 and 329:
13. EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS13.1 It is
Page 330 and 331:
CBRE | LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMIT
Page 332 and 333:
APPENDIX 2 - Strategic Review of Sh
Page 334 and 335:
appropriate for residents’ needs.
Page 336 and 337:
6.2.2 Recommendation 2: HRD and ASC
Page 338 and 339:
6.7.1.3 Option 3: Provide accommoda
Page 340 and 341:
APPENDIX 3 - STRATEGIC REVIEW OF SH
Page 342 and 343:
It be noted by Cabinet that Phase 1
Page 344 and 345:
Agenda Item 16London Borough of Ham
Page 346 and 347:
1. SUMMARY1.1 Cabinet approved a re
Page 348 and 349:
prevention methodology that meets l
Page 350 and 351:
applicants from outside the borough
Page 352 and 353:
priority being given to community c
Page 354 and 355:
already suitably housed within thei
Page 356 and 357:
services personnel; working househo
Page 358 and 359:
• The proposals have a built-in i
Page 360 and 361:
(iii) Due regard is regard that is
Page 362 and 363:
Tenancy Strategy8.8 The analysis of
Page 364 and 365:
such as financial resources, behavi
Page 366 and 367:
Building a Housing Ladder of Opport
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
Page 418 and 419:
Page 420 and 421:
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
Page 426 and 427:
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
Page 442 and 443:
Page 444 and 445:
Page 446 and 447:
Page 448 and 449:
Page 450 and 451:
Page 452 and 453:
Page 454 and 455:
Page 456 and 457:
Page 458 and 459:
Page 460 and 461:
Page 462 and 463:
Page 464 and 465:
Page 466 and 467:
Page 468 and 469:
Page 470 and 471:
Page 472 and 473: Building a Housing Ladder of Opport
Page 474 and 475: London Borough of Hammersmith & Ful
Page 476 and 477: Page 471
Page 482 and 483: Housing Strategy Documents -Consult
Page 494 and 495: Full Equality Impact Analysis ToolO
Page 496 and 497: 3. Manage a better, streamlined hou
Page 498 and 499: Genderreassignmentimpairment(s). Ta
Page 500 and 501: monitored and evaluated. A key elem
Page 502 and 503: RaceGiven the high levels of depriv
Page 504 and 505: that many Private Registered Provid
Page 506 and 507: SexSexualOrientationThe Tenancy Str
Page 508 and 509: Government’s Homelessness Order.P
Page 510 and 511: Section 03Documents and datareviewe
Page 512 and 513: the borough (53.95). The five wards
Page 514 and 515: ReligionThe religious profile of th
Page 516 and 517: Employment in Hammersmith and Fulha
Page 518 and 519: New researchFollowing the equality
Page 520 and 521: Using the Council’s Citizenspace
Page 524 and 525: more detailed approach to monitorin
Page 526 and 527: accessible housing and the 16 lifet
Page 528 and 529: Section 08Chief Officer sign-offAgr
Page 530 and 531: 1. BACKGROUND1.1 With the substanti
Page 532 and 533: 3. CONTRACT AWARD MODEL3.1 The Cabi
Page 534 and 535: 8.3 Prior to the issue of any Order
Page 536 and 537: 2012/15 PPM Framework - Year 1 Prop
Page 546 and 547: has also provided the opportunity t
Page 548 and 549: CABINET MEMBERFOR TRANSPORTAND TECH
Page 550 and 551: CABINET MEMBERFOR COMMUNITYCARECoun
Page 552 and 553: CABINET MEMBERFOR HOUSINGCouncillor
Page 554: LEADER(+REGENERATION,ASSETMANAGEMEN
show all

Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?