Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ...
Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ... Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ...
Page 275.CPP Ethnic groups 2005 - 2012 % of total CPP PopulationA p r - 0 5J u l - 0 5O c t - 0 5J a n - 0 6A p r - 0 6J u l - 0 6O c t - 0 6J a n - 0 7A p r - 0 7J u l - 0 7O c t - 0 74.73 National Indicators – PerformanceSummary of NI definitionsNINI64J a n - 0 8A p r - 0 8J u l - 0 8O c t - 0 8J a n - 0 9A p r - 0 9J u l - 0 9O c t - 0 9J a n - 1 0A p r - 1 0J u l - 1 0O c t - 1 0J a n - 1 1A p r - 1 1J u l - 1 1O c t - 1 1J a n - 1 2A p r - 1 2Definition% of children ceasing to be the subject of a CPP during theyear ending 31 March, who had been the subject of a CPPcontinuously for two years or longerNI65 % of children who became the subject of a CPP at any timeduring the year, who had previously been the subject of a CPP% of children with a CPP at 31 March who at that date hadNI67 had a Plan continuously for at least the previous 3 months,whose case was reviewed within the required timescales.50.0%Asianor45.0%AsianBritish40.0%Black orBlack35.0%British30.0%Mixed25.0%20.0%OtherEthnic15.0%Groups10.0%White5.0%0.0%GoodperformanceTypified by alower percentage10 < 15 goodperformance100%- 58 -
Key to NI BandsLow HighNI 1 2 3 4 5 4 3 2 1NI64 0
- Page 230 and 231: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 232 and 233: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 234 and 235: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 236 and 237: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 238 and 239: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 240 and 241: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 242 and 243: 3. Governance and Accountability3.1
- Page 244 and 245: UnitMiley SteveAssistant Director,
- Page 246 and 247: Page 241Community Drug and Alcohol
- Page 248 and 249: Page 243Tim DeaconSue HaywardRoger
- Page 250 and 251: 3.9 Child Death Overview PanelThis
- Page 252 and 253: 3.12 Budget 2011-2012(This follows
- Page 254 and 255: Page 249Quality of provisionThe con
- Page 256 and 257: Page 251Disabled Children’sTeamFo
- Page 258 and 259: Page 253and AlcoholService (CDAS)CN
- Page 260 and 261: Page 255borough. However, wedo moni
- Page 262 and 263: able to provide greater evidence in
- Page 264 and 265: 21%Organisational Profile of applic
- Page 266 and 267: Review of participation data and qu
- Page 268 and 269: New and Discontinued CPP 2005-20128
- Page 270 and 271: • There continues to be high numb
- Page 272 and 273: 4.66 Removals from CP PlansDe-regis
- Page 274 and 275: Page 269• Rate of re plans (re re
- Page 276 and 277: 4.69 Categories of CP PlansQuarterE
- Page 278 and 279: 6%8%5%36%0 - 34 - 67 - 1213 - 1828%
- Page 282 and 283: R e fe rrals R ate per 10,000 popul
- Page 284 and 285: No. of children 1st time registered
- Page 286 and 287: 4.91Child PopulationCurrently there
- Page 288 and 289: Across the borough the proportion o
- Page 290 and 291: 5. How does the LSCB Monitor Activi
- Page 292 and 293: • offer support services• alloc
- Page 294 and 295: Page 289Housing3-borough Child Deat
- Page 296 and 297: continue to be refined and develope
- Page 298 and 299: Agenda Item 12Tri-borough Executive
- Page 300 and 301: 4 BACKGROUND, INCLUDING POLICY CONT
- Page 302 and 303: 6.3 TriageAll troubled families who
- Page 304 and 305: The learning from this may be utili
- Page 306 and 307: 9.4.3 Current/future costsCurrent/f
- Page 308 and 309: Making decisions about working in o
- Page 310 and 311: RefRisk description"If.., then.."be
- Page 312 and 313: No. Issue Mitigation RAG impact onp
- Page 314 and 315: APPENDIX 2: Definition of a Trouble
- Page 316 and 317: HammersmithFulhamKensingtonChelsea&
- Page 318 and 319: 1. BACKGROUND, INCLUDING POLICY CON
- Page 320 and 321: 3.4 Although the provision is sligh
- Page 322 and 323: Agenda Item 15London Borough of Ham
- Page 324 and 325: 2. THE APPOINTMENT OF CBRE AND THEI
- Page 326 and 327: ationalisation or additional invest
- Page 328 and 329: 13. EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS13.1 It is
Page 275.CPP Ethnic groups 2005 - <strong>2012</strong> % of total CPP PopulationA p r - 0 5J u l - 0 5O c t - 0 5J a n - 0 6A p r - 0 6J u l - 0 6O c t - 0 6J a n - 0 7A p r - 0 7J u l - 0 7O c t - 0 74.73 National Indicators – PerformanceSummary of NI definitionsNINI64J a n - 0 8A p r - 0 8J u l - 0 8O c t - 0 8J a n - 0 9A p r - 0 9J u l - 0 9O c t - 0 9J a n - 1 0A p r - 1 0J u l - 1 0O c t - 1 0J a n - 1 1A p r - 1 1J u l - 1 1O c t - 1 1J a n - 1 2A p r - 1 2Definition% of children ceasing to be the subject of a CPP during theyear ending 31 March, who had been the subject of a CPPcontinuously for two years or longerNI65 % of children who became the subject of a CPP at any timeduring the year, who had previously been the subject of a CPP% of children with a CPP at 31 March who at that date hadNI67 had a Plan continuously for at least the previous 3 months,whose case was reviewed within the required timescales.50.0%Asianor45.0%AsianBritish40.0%Black orBlack35.0%British30.0%Mixed25.0%20.0%OtherEthnic<strong>15</strong>.0%Groups<strong>10</strong>.0%White5.0%0.0%GoodperformanceTypified by alower percentage<strong>10</strong> < <strong>15</strong> goodperformance<strong>10</strong>0%- 58 -