Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ...
Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ... Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ...
Key Priorities and progress for individualagenciesPage 231intercollegiate document wewere aware that uptake oftraining at levels 2 and 3 waslow and therefore we neededto push this out to all relevantstaff. Child Protection List(CPL) flagging was workingquite well but there weresome difficulties in accessingthe flags on all the IT systemsin use within the Trust. Alarge number of children fromoutside the 4 local boroughscontinue to be seen in ourPaediatric EmergencyDepartment and therefore wewere concerned we were notidentifying all children subjectto a Child Protection Plan. Wewere starting to collect KeyPerformance Indicators (KPIs)for safeguarding issues inorder to evidence tocommissioners that we haverobust systems in place.were successful in recruiting anotherperson to help the incumbent carry outtheir duties. We have successfullyincreased our training uptake for level 2and 3 training from A to B and C to Drespectively. This was achieved byoffering a lot more training opportunitieswith the help of our expert externaltrainers. Feedback has been verypositive and has led to continuedincreases in calls for advice andreferrals to Social Services – thisindicated improved practice. We haveworked hard to mitigate against anypotential risk in our Paediatric UrgentCare Centre (UCC) which utilise two ITsystems (Adastra and Lastword) thatdon’t link with each other. We haveextended CPL data on Adastra toinclude Wandsworth children. We areplanning to extend coverage for both ITsystems to Ealing and Hounslowchildren and if this is achieved we willbe one of the few trusts that is able tocapture and integrate so much data. Wehave continued to work hard on theKPIs and have been able to capture afull year’s data which has been veryhelpful to look at trends. We arecontinuously extending and refining thedatasets so that it can become moretraining at all levels but werecognise that with the highturnover of staff this may notbe practically possible. A largenumber of staff receive trainingelsewhere and our trainingmanagement system cannoteffectively capture this so thisneeds to be collected fromstaff individually.We are looking at how we canbetter collate this data.this period.14
Key Priorities and progress for individualagenciesPage 232Community Drugand AlcoholService (CDAS)CNWLStanding TogetherAgainst DomesticViolenceFor all staff tocomplete/update the elearning packages forsafeguarding childrenTo establish and maintainprotocols with partnershipsand ensure pathways are inplace for referral and to aidcommunicationTo ensure that safeguardingcontinues to be embeddedinto practice throughsupervisionandmultidisciplinary discussionTo audit safeguarding casesand ensure a high standard ofcare is maintained feedbackgood practice or any arearequiring improvementa. 24 Targeted groups ofvulnerable young peopleaged 13-19 years to bemore aware of dynamicsof domestic violence inintimate relationships andhow to keep themselvessafe. (12 to be moreaware in Year 1; 12 inYear 2)meaningful.Safeguarding children E leaning hasbeen completed by all staff andevidence provided to the Trust (someother staff have also completedadditional training in relation tosafeguarding within the borough)Links have been maintained andprotocol developed with partnershipagenciesSafeguarding issues are beingaddressed though assessment,supervision, training and clinicalmeetingsA Trust audit has been completed andawaiting feedbackFor outcomes 1&2 we have exceededour targets and increased awareness in71 vulnerable young people We haveworked in partnership with Women andGirls Network and HAFADOutcomes 3- 6 have been moreproblematic and referrals have been themajor issue as services wouldn’t refer toa service delivered during school time.This took a lot of time to work throughTo further develop protocols toensure that when a child isidentified as being ‘at risk’ thata referral is made to theappropriate team and that anyimmediate action is taken tosafeguard.Communication betweenservices following referral andassessmentTo continue to find a way todeliver therapy to schoolchildren in a way that does notimpact on their in school time.To ensure that all children’sworkforce know how toidentify, risk assess and referappropriately to domesticabuse services.NoAlthough DV specialist arenow well aware ofIndependent DomesticViolence Advisors (IDVA’s)and Multi Agency RiskAssessment Conference(MARAC) practitioners maynot understand the severity ofrisk attached to a MARACreferral. Practitioners were15
- Page 186 and 187: TABLE 1DEMONSTRATION OF RAINFALL AB
- Page 188 and 189: consider if it was a feasible and a
- Page 190 and 191: 3. EngagementENGAGEMENT: Overview3.
- Page 192 and 193: Recommendation Eleven: Flooding Dat
- Page 194 and 195: 3.16. The Task Group did note that
- Page 196 and 197: due to the belief it will be detrim
- Page 198 and 199: orough or chose to disregard the ri
- Page 200 and 201: WitnessesThe following people and o
- Page 202 and 203: Governance & ScrutinyLondon Borough
- Page 204 and 205: 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1.1 This report
- Page 206 and 207: appropriateness of the child protec
- Page 208 and 209: held within the period. It is of si
- Page 210 and 211: MonthEnd 0 - 1 % 2 - 3 % 4 - 8 %9 -
- Page 212 and 213: sought for children rather than wid
- Page 214 and 215: • Social workers present their ca
- Page 216 and 217: Improved Child Protection Planning6
- Page 218 and 219: 8. COMMENTS OF THE DIRECTOR OF LAW8
- Page 220 and 221: 1. BACKGROUND1.1 The following summ
- Page 222 and 223: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2000LIST OF BA
- Page 224 and 225: Contents1. Foreword by H&F LSCB Cha
- Page 226 and 227: 1. Foreword (Russell Wate, Chair of
- Page 228 and 229: 2. Summary2.1 The table below outli
- Page 230 and 231: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 232 and 233: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 234 and 235: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 238 and 239: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 240 and 241: Key Priorities and progress for ind
- Page 242 and 243: 3. Governance and Accountability3.1
- Page 244 and 245: UnitMiley SteveAssistant Director,
- Page 246 and 247: Page 241Community Drug and Alcohol
- Page 248 and 249: Page 243Tim DeaconSue HaywardRoger
- Page 250 and 251: 3.9 Child Death Overview PanelThis
- Page 252 and 253: 3.12 Budget 2011-2012(This follows
- Page 254 and 255: Page 249Quality of provisionThe con
- Page 256 and 257: Page 251Disabled Children’sTeamFo
- Page 258 and 259: Page 253and AlcoholService (CDAS)CN
- Page 260 and 261: Page 255borough. However, wedo moni
- Page 262 and 263: able to provide greater evidence in
- Page 264 and 265: 21%Organisational Profile of applic
- Page 266 and 267: Review of participation data and qu
- Page 268 and 269: New and Discontinued CPP 2005-20128
- Page 270 and 271: • There continues to be high numb
- Page 272 and 273: 4.66 Removals from CP PlansDe-regis
- Page 274 and 275: Page 269• Rate of re plans (re re
- Page 276 and 277: 4.69 Categories of CP PlansQuarterE
- Page 278 and 279: 6%8%5%36%0 - 34 - 67 - 1213 - 1828%
- Page 280 and 281: Page 275.CPP Ethnic groups 2005 - 2
- Page 282 and 283: R e fe rrals R ate per 10,000 popul
- Page 284 and 285: No. of children 1st time registered
Key Priorities and progress for individualagenciesPage 231intercollegiate document wewere aware that uptake oftraining at levels 2 and 3 waslow and therefore we neededto push this out to all relevantstaff. Child Protection List(CPL) flagging was workingquite well but there weresome difficulties in accessingthe flags on all the IT systemsin use within the Trust. Alarge number of children fromoutside the 4 local boroughscontinue to be seen in ourPaediatric EmergencyDepartment and therefore wewere concerned we were notidentifying all children subjectto a Child Protection Plan. Wewere starting to collect KeyPerformance Indicators (KPIs)for safeguarding issues inorder to evidence tocommissioners that we haverobust systems in place.were successful in recruiting anotherperson to help the incumbent carry outtheir duties. We have successfullyincreased our training uptake for level 2and 3 training from A to B and C to Drespectively. This was achieved byoffering a lot more training opportunitieswith the help of our expert externaltrainers. Feedback has been verypositive and has led to continuedincreases in calls for advice andreferrals to Social Services – thisindicated improved practice. We haveworked hard to mitigate against anypotential risk in our Paediatric UrgentCare Centre (UCC) which utilise two ITsystems (Adastra and Lastword) thatdon’t link with each other. We haveextended CPL data on Adastra toinclude Wandsworth children. We areplanning to extend coverage for both ITsystems to Ealing and Hounslowchildren and if this is achieved we willbe one of the few trusts that is able tocapture and integrate so much data. Wehave continued to work hard on theKPIs and have been able to capture afull year’s data which has been veryhelpful to look at trends. We arecontinuously extending and refining thedatasets so that it can become moretraining at all levels but werecognise that with the highturnover of staff this may notbe practically possible. A largenumber of staff receive trainingelsewhere and our trainingmanagement system cannoteffectively capture this so thisneeds to be collected fromstaff individually.We are looking at how we canbetter collate this data.this period.14
Change language