Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ...
Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ... Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/10/2012, 19.00 - Meetings ...
undertake which has an emphasis on biodiversityinfrastructure.and greenSuggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Nine: Porous PavingIt is recommended that the Council undertake a feasibility and costassessment as to whether porous surfaces would be a suitable materialto use on (i) highways, (ii) footpaths and (iii) hard standing areas and ifthe Council deems porous paving a feasible and cost-effectivealternative, establish annual targets for replacing existing paving in linewith ongoing regeneration and maintenance work.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Ten: Information SharingIt is recommended that the Council engage directly with Thames Waterto seek to come to an arrangement to allow for the sharing of all relevantinformation to enable both parties to better fulfil their responsibilitiesunder the Flood Water Management Act and the Flood Risk Regulations.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Eleven: Flooding Data FormatIt is recommended that Thames Water and the Council agree upon auniform data format for data collection.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Twelve: Flood ContactsIt is recommended that, in order to facilitate a better workingrelationship between the Council and Thames Water, each organisationidentify an individual point of contact for operational matters.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVED with the Flood RiskManager to undertake the role of the individual point of contact for theCouncil. Thames Water is also requested to appoint an individual pointof contact for operational enquiries.Recommendation Thirteen: Information Sharing SystemsIt is recommended that the Council and Thames Water examine thewebsite operated by Northamptonshire County Council and seek toimplement a similar system to allow both responsible parties to reportflooding events and share information. Additionally they should explorethe possibility of incorporating the flooding asset register into thissystem. This system should be for internal use only and not for publicuse.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Fourteen: Flood Risk Management AssetsPage 155
Thames Water, in order to abide by their obligations under the FloodWater Management Act should share all information in respect to thesewer system in and around the London Borough of Hammersmith andFulham, with particular emphasis and urgency given to any part of thesewer network identified on the public register of Flood RiskManagement Assets.Suggested Executive Decision: Endorsed and referred to Thames Waterfor a decision and response.Recommendation Fifteen: Planning Applications AssessmentsIt is recommended that the Council and Thames Water undertake areview into how they share information on planning applications, howplanning applications flood risk assessments are processed, prioritisedfor comment and referred. This should include agreeing the criteria forreferral to Thames Water for consultation on specific applications thatwarrant a surface water flooding perspective. Additionally both theCouncil and Thames Water, if making representations, should take intoaccount the interlinking nature of their respective flooding roles andmake any representations they see fit in this light.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Sixteen: Flooding InsuranceIt is recommended that the Council make a representation to theDepartment for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) statingthat the insurance industry should take greater account of anysustainable drainage systems (SUDs) or other property protectionmeasures incorporated into a property when calculating its insurancepremium.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Seventeen: A Flood FairIt is recommended that the Council hold a Flood Fair. The aim of theFlood Fair should be to collect historical information on floodingincidents, increase awareness of flooding risks and clarifyresponsibilities between the responsible flooding parties. Otherstakeholders, such as Thames Water, the Environment Agency, theDepartment for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), andcompanies that provide sustainable drainage systems (SUDS) and otherflooding prevention systems should be invited along. All residents thatthe Council is aware have suffered from flooding in the past should beinvited, as well as community groups. Ideally the event would be heldover a number of days in different parts of the borough.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Eighteen: Community EngagementIt is recommended that the Council seek to engage with residentsthrough Residents Associations and other community forums.Page 156
- Page 110 and 111: Schedule 4The Developer’s Obligat
- Page 112 and 113: 4.4 to consult with the Council in
- Page 114 and 115: Developer shall procure a Surety in
- Page 116 and 117: 1.8 to give the Developer not less
- Page 118 and 119: 2.4.4 appoint Leading Counsel and j
- Page 120 and 121: 5 Appeal5.1 If the Secretary of Sta
- Page 122 and 123: Schedule 6Exit ConsequencesPart A:
- Page 124 and 125: Part D: Where the Developer asserts
- Page 126 and 127: 5.3 It is agreed that:5.3.1 the Exp
- Page 128 and 129: 4.3 No waiver of any provision of t
- Page 130 and 131: 10.3.3 where (and to the extent tha
- Page 132 and 133: acting by:DirectorDirector/Secretar
- Page 134 and 135: Appendix DEquality Impact Analysis
- Page 136 and 137: On conclusion of the construction w
- Page 138 and 139: It is identified that the market pr
- Page 140 and 141: During the construction works, ther
- Page 142 and 143: 1. The developer will maintain acce
- Page 144 and 145: Market. This will protect the avail
- Page 146 and 147: compensated in accordance with the
- Page 148 and 149: women. It would also be likely that
- Page 150 and 151: Page 145Issue identifiedDisruption
- Page 152 and 153: Agenda Item 9London Borough of Hamm
- Page 154 and 155: 1. BACKGROUND1.1. The flooding scru
- Page 156 and 157: 7. COMMENTS OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECT
- Page 158 and 159: Appendix 1Hammersmith & Fulham Coun
- Page 162 and 163: Suggested Executive Decision: APPRO
- Page 164 and 165: ContentsForeword………………
- Page 166 and 167: Members of the Task GroupCouncillor
- Page 168 and 169: The Task Group has put forward 20 r
- Page 170 and 171: Recommendation Six: Rainwater Reten
- Page 172 and 173: It is likely that external resource
- Page 174 and 175: IntroductionThe Flooding Scrutiny T
- Page 176 and 177: year rainfall event. If such an eve
- Page 178 and 179: as from information provided by res
- Page 180 and 181: system, what knowledge and data gap
- Page 182 and 183: equired. The aim of all development
- Page 184 and 185: ►►►Reducing air pollution as
- Page 186 and 187: TABLE 1DEMONSTRATION OF RAINFALL AB
- Page 188 and 189: consider if it was a feasible and a
- Page 190 and 191: 3. EngagementENGAGEMENT: Overview3.
- Page 192 and 193: Recommendation Eleven: Flooding Dat
- Page 194 and 195: 3.16. The Task Group did note that
- Page 196 and 197: due to the belief it will be detrim
- Page 198 and 199: orough or chose to disregard the ri
- Page 200 and 201: WitnessesThe following people and o
- Page 202 and 203: Governance & ScrutinyLondon Borough
- Page 204 and 205: 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1.1 This report
- Page 206 and 207: appropriateness of the child protec
- Page 208 and 209: held within the period. It is of si
undertake which has an emphasis on biodiversityinfrastructure.and greenSuggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Nine: Porous PavingIt is recommended that the Council undertake a feasibility and costassessment as to whether porous surfaces would be a suitable materialto use on (i) highways, (ii) footpaths and (iii) hard standing areas and ifthe Council deems porous paving a feasible and cost-effectivealternative, establish annual targets for replacing existing paving in linewith ongoing regeneration and maintenance work.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Ten: Information SharingIt is recommended that the Council engage directly with Thames Waterto seek to come to an arrangement to allow for the sharing of all relevantinformation to enable both parties to better fulfil their responsibilitiesunder the Flood Water Management Act and the Flood Risk Regulations.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Eleven: Flooding Data FormatIt is recommended that Thames Water and the Council agree upon auniform data format for data collection.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Twelve: Flood ContactsIt is recommended that, in order to facilitate a better workingrelationship between the Council and Thames Water, each organisationidentify an individual point of contact for operational matters.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVED with the Flood RiskManager to undertake the role of the individual point of contact for theCouncil. Thames Water is also requested to appoint an individual pointof contact for operational enquiries.Recommendation Thirteen: Information Sharing SystemsIt is recommended that the Council and Thames Water examine thewebsite operated by Northamptonshire County Council and seek toimplement a similar system to allow both responsible parties to reportflooding events and share information. Additionally they should explorethe possibility of incorporating the flooding asset register into thissystem. This system should be for internal use only and not for publicuse.Suggested Executive Decision: APPROVEDRecommendation Fourteen: Flood Risk Management AssetsPage <strong>15</strong>5
Change language