12.07.2015 Views

Jolliffe I. Principal Component Analysis (2ed., Springer, 2002)(518s)

Jolliffe I. Principal Component Analysis (2ed., Springer, 2002)(518s)

Jolliffe I. Principal Component Analysis (2ed., Springer, 2002)(518s)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.2. Estimation of the Factor Model 153be used, and it also means that there is indeterminacy in the solutions—the‘best-fitting’ solution is not unique.Estimation of the model is usually done initially in terms of the parametersin Λ and Ψ, while estimates of f are found at a later stage.Given the assumptions of the previous section, the covariance matrix canbe calculated for both sides of (7.1.2) givingΣ = ΛΛ ′ + Ψ. (7.2.1)In practice, we have the sample covariance (or correlation) matrix S, ratherthan Σ, andΛ and Ψ are found so as to satisfyS = ΛΛ ′ + Ψ,(which does not involve the unknown vector of factor scores f) as closely aspossible. The indeterminacy of the solution now becomes obvious; if Λ, Ψis a solution of (7.2.1) and T is an orthogonal matrix, then Λ ∗ , Ψ is alsoa solution, where Λ ∗ = ΛT. This follows sinceΛ ∗ Λ ∗′ =(ΛT)(ΛT) ′= ΛTT ′ Λ ′= ΛΛ ′ ,as T is orthogonal.Because of the indeterminacy, estimation of Λ and Ψ typically proceedsin two stages. In the first, some restrictions are placed on Λ in order to finda unique initial solution. Having found an initial solution, other solutionswhich can be found by rotation of Λ, that is, multiplication by an orthogonalmatrix T, are explored. The ‘best’ of these rotated solutions is chosenaccording to some particular criterion. There are several possible criteria,but all are designed to make the structure of Λ as simple as possible in somesense, with most elements of Λ either ‘close to zero’ or ‘far from zero,’ andwith as few as possible of the elements taking intermediate values. Moststatistical computer packages provide options for several different rotationcriteria, such as varimax, quartimax and promax. Cattell (1978, p. 136),Richman (1986) give non-exhaustive lists of eleven and nineteen automaticrotation methods, respectively, including some like oblimax that enable thefactors to become oblique by allowing T to be not necessarily orthogonal.For illustration, we give the formula for what is probably the most popularrotation criterion, varimax. It is the default in several of the best knownsoftware packages. For details of other rotation criteria see Cattell (1978,p. 136), Lawley and Maxwell (1971, Chapter 6), Lewis-Beck (1994, SectionII.3), Richman (1986) or Rummel (1970, Chapters 16 and 17) An exampleillustrating the results of using two rotation criteria is given in Section 7.4.Suppose that B = ΛT and that B has elements b jk ,j=1, 2,...,p; k =1, 2,...,m. Then for varimax rotation the orthogonal rotation matrix T is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!