12.07.2015 Views

Shape Marks - Intellectual Property Office of Singapore

Shape Marks - Intellectual Property Office of Singapore

Shape Marks - Intellectual Property Office of Singapore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Shape</strong> marks4 SECTION 7(3) OBJECTIONS APPLICABLE TO 2-DIMENSIONAL AND 3-DIMENSIONAL SHAPE MARKS<strong>Shape</strong> suggests three-dimensional form. Confusion however arises where, although thesign sought to be registered appears to be a 3D shape mark, the graphic representation isin two-dimensions. The Registrar will ask the question, “Is such a sign a threedimensionalshape or a two-dimensional drawing or picture <strong>of</strong> a figurative mark?”Usually the answer to this question should be clear from the indication/description <strong>of</strong>the mark on the application form. But even if it is not, it should make no difference to theapplicability <strong>of</strong> Section 7(3). This was the approach taken in Philips v Remington [1998]R.P.C. 283. The sign there was a picture <strong>of</strong> the head <strong>of</strong> a three-headed shaver.Thus, Section 7(3) objections can be raised for 2-D graphical representation <strong>of</strong> a 3-Dshape mark. In the Philips case, it was found that the mark was objectionable under anequivalent <strong>of</strong> our Section 7(3)(b) – that the sign was <strong>of</strong> a shape which was necessary toobtain a technical result, thus, it shall be refused registration.Version 1 (13 January 2006) Page 5 <strong>Intellectual</strong> <strong>Property</strong> <strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Singapore</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!