12.07.2015 Views

1 IN THE COURT OF MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS ...

1 IN THE COURT OF MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS ...

1 IN THE COURT OF MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6ISSUE Nos.2 & 3.16. Both these issues are taken up together for considerationfor the sake of convenience and brevity. The claimant, in his Claimapplication, stated the age of his deceased wife to be '32' years at the time ofdeath. From the copy of the Post Mortem Report submitted by the claimant,it also appears that the deceased was aged about '32' years at the time of herdeath. Accordingly, for the purpose of assessment of the compensation, theappropriate multiplier in this case is found to be '17' (Seventeen) as perSecond schedule of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988. As per CW.1, his deceasedwife engaged herself in the business of selling clothes and used to earnRs.5,000/- only per month, and their family was depending upon herincome. Though, CW.2 and CW.3 supported the version of the claimant(PW.1), but no any document was found submitted in support to that effectby the claimant.17. Be that as it may, in absence of any concrete evidence,keeping in view the avocation pursued by the deceased it would not beunreasonable to hold that her monthly income was approximatelyRs.2,000/- only at the time of her death. Accordingly, the annual income ofthe deceased is found to be Rs.24,000/- only, and if we deduct 1/3 rd of thesaid annual income to be personal expense of the deceased, the annualdependency would come around Rs.16,000/- only. Now, by multiplying theannual dependency, Rs.16,000/- only by the multiplier, '17', the total loss ofincome is found to be Rs.2,72,000/- only, to which the claimant is foundentitled to get as compensation. The claimant is also entitled to get anamount of Rs.2,000/- only, as funeral expense, and another sum ofRs.5,000/- only, on the head of 'loss of consortium' being the spouse of thedeceased.18. Thus, in total, the claimant is found entitled to an amountof Rs.2,79,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Seventy Nine Thousand) only, ascompensation for the death of his deceased wife due to the road trafficaccident.19. The OP No.1, OP No.2 and OP No.4 being the driver,owner and insurer respectively of the offending truck bearing registration

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!