Glendale (PDF) - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California
Glendale (PDF) - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California
Glendale (PDF) - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 4-2: STAPLEE Ranking <strong>of</strong> Action Items2007 Disaster <strong>Mitigation</strong> Plan, City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Glendale</strong>, <strong>California</strong>ACTION ITEMSEQ = Earthquake, MH= Multi <strong>Hazard</strong> ST= Short Term, LT= Long TermDESCRIPTIONAdvisory CommitteeManagement ServicesFirePublic WorksPlanning<strong>Glendale</strong> Water & PowerPolice<strong>Glendale</strong> Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Co Dept. <strong>of</strong> TransportationLos Angeles County FloodAcceptanceSocialEffect on Segment <strong>of</strong> PopulationTechnicalFeasibilityLong-Term SolutionAdministrative Political Legal Economic nvironmentaStaffingFunding AllocatedMaintenancePublic SupportPolitical Support<strong>State</strong> AuthorityExisting Local Auth.Potential ChallengeBenefitCostOutside FundingEffects on EnvironmentConsistent with Community GoalsTOTALRANKMH ST 1MH ST 2MH ST 3MH ST 4MH ST 5MH ST 6MH ST 7Integrate NHMP into <strong>Glendale</strong>’s General Plan, Capital Improvement Plansand local Codes. Lobby to have NHMP concerns integrated into new Codes.Identify and pursue funding opportunities to develop and implement localand City mitigation activities.Establish a formal role for the City <strong>of</strong> <strong>Glendale</strong>’s <strong>Hazard</strong>s <strong>Mitigation</strong> AdvisoryCommittee to develop a sustainable process for implementing, monitoring,and evaluating citywide mitigation activities.Transfer cost <strong>of</strong> risk to owners through insurance. Pinpoint specific hazardsand focus education to match. Continue community wide Public Educationand unify organizations involved in the effort.Identify stake holders and responders. Develop mutual goals and formalizeintegration <strong>of</strong> plans. Improve coordination between GPW and CDOT, andElectric and Transportation utilities in response preparation.Develop inventories <strong>of</strong> at-risk buildings and infrastructure and prioritizemitigation projects.Have owners upgrade bridges where needed. Coordinate emergencytransportation routes. (GPW and Cal DOT.) Coordinate public, privateresources and establish response teams. Educate public <strong>of</strong>ficials re:requirements for disaster response.CO X X X 2 0 2 3 2 0 -1 2 2 2 2 0 2 -1 0 0 0 17 20CO 2 0 2 2 2 0 -1 2 3 2 2 0 2 -1 2 0 0 19 14X CO X 3 2 3 3 2 0 -1 2 2 3 3 0 2 -1 0 0 0 23 6CO 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 -2 2 -1 0 0 0 13 30X CO X 2 2 2 2 1 0 -1 1 2 2 2 0 2 -1 0 0 0 16 23X X CO 2 -1 2 3 2 1 -1 3 3 2 2 -1 3 -1 1 0 0 20 10X CO 2 -2 3 3 1 0 -1 2 3 2 1 -1 2 -2 1 0 0 14 29MH LT 1 Publish the Plan, start outreach and public education on aspects <strong>of</strong> NHMP. X CO X X 3 2 3 2 1 0 -1 2 3 3 3 0 2 -1 0 0 0 22 8MH LT 2MH LT 3Slides ST 1Incorporate natural systems and processes in local codes, and use themwhere possible to reduce hazards.Address conflicts created by overlapping regulatory requirements; developsingle reference for emergency action. Include terrorism in Public Educationefforts.Map landslide hazards; emphasize economic risk when building in theseareas.CO 3 -1 2 2 1 0 -1 2 2 2 1 -1 2 -2 1 2 2 17 19CO X 2 2 2 3 2 0 -1 3 3 2 2 0 2 -1 0 0 0 21 9CO CO 2 -2 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 2 1 -1 2 -1 0 0 0 12 33Slides ST 2 Increase communication and coordination between the City’s Departments. CO CO 3 2 3 2 1 0 -2 3 3 1 2 0 2 -1 0 0 0 19 13Slides ST 3Slides LT 1Slides LT 2Increase participation in regional committee planning for emergencytransportation routes. Identify and publicize information regardingemergency transportation routes. Identify potential debris removal resourcesto open routes if needed.Create committee <strong>of</strong> local stakeholders to study issue and makerecommendations to staff.Analyze and perhaps strengthen existing regulations regarding developmentin landslide prone areas. Identify existing mechanisms for public outreach /develop new methods <strong>of</strong> outreach.CO 2 1 2 2 1 0 -1 2 2 2 1 0 2 -1 0 0 0 15 272 2 2 2 1 0 -1 2 3 1 2 0 2 -1 0 0 0 17 18CO X 2 1 3 3 1 0 -1 1 2 2 1 -1 2 -1 0 0 0 15 26Maximum Possible Score 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 0 3 0 3 3 3 42 Maximumpossible scoreFor a description <strong>of</strong> the grading system used to weigh each action item, refer to Table 4.4.