Glendale (PDF) - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity of Glendale, CaliforniaAppendix I – ReferencesLoma Prieta (Santa Cruz Mountains), California, Earthquake of 17 October 1989:California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 104, pp. 59-66.State of California, Office of Planning and Research (OPR), 1987, General Plan Guidelines.State of California, SSC-01, Seismic Safety Commission, 1988, Steps to Earthquake Safety forLocal Governments, Report No. SSC 88-01.State of California, SSC-03, Seismic Safety Commission, 1987-03, Guidebook to Identify andMitigate Seismic Hazards in Buildings, Report No. SSC 87-03.Stewart, J.P., Bray, J.D., McMahon, D.J., and Kropp, A.L., 1995, Seismic Performance of HillsideFills: Reprint from Landslides Under Static and Dynamic Conditions-Analysis,Monitoring, and Mitigation: Geotechnical Engineering Division/ASCE, held October23-27, 1995, San Diego.Stewart, C.A., Colby, N.D, Kent, R.T., Egan, J.A., and Hall, N.T., 1998, Earth Fissuring,Ground-Water Flow, and Ground-Water Quality in the Chino Basin, California; inBorchers, J.W., (editor), Land Subsidence, Case Studies and Current Research:Association of Engineering Geologists Special Publication No. 8; Proceedings of the Dr.Joseph F. Poland Symposium on Land Subsidence.Sudduth, C., 1985, Evaluating Earthquake Ground Failure Potential for DevelopmentDecisions, Summary of Working Group V and Audience Discussion; in FutureDirections in Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in Los Angeles Region, An Earth-SciencePerspective: U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1360, pp. 320.Tan, S. S., 1998, Slope Failure and Erosion Assessment of the Fire Areas at Fillmore (April1996) and Piru (August 1997), Ventura County, California: California Division of Minesand Geology Open File Report 98-32.Tinsley, J.C., Youd, T.L., Perkins, D.M., and Chen, A.T.F., 1985, Evaluating LiquefactionPotential in Ziony, J.I., (editor), Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los AngelesRegion – An Earth Science Perspective: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper1360, pp. 263-316.Tinsley, J.C., and Fumal, T.E., 1985, Mapping Quaternary Sedimentary Deposits for AerialVariations in Shaking Response; in Ziony, J.I., (editor), Evaluating Earthquake Hazardsin the Los Angeles Region – An Earth Science Perspective: U.S. Geological SurveyProfessional Paper 1360, pp. 101-125.Townley, Sidney D. (1939). Earthquakes in California, 1769 to 1928: Bulletin of theSeismological Society of America, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 21-252.Treiman, J.A., 1995, Surface Faulting Near Santa Clarita; in Woods, M.C., and Seiple, W.R.,(editors), The Northridge, California, Earthquake of 17 January 1994: CaliforniaDivision of Mines and Geology Special Publication 116, pp. 103-110.Tucker, A.Z., and Dolan, J.F., 2001, Paleoseismologic Evidence for a >8 ka Age of the MostRecent Surface Rupture on the Eastern Sierra Madre Fault, Northern Los AngelesMetropolitan Region, California: Seismological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 91, pp.232-249.2006 PAGE I - 12
Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity of Glendale, CaliforniaAppendix I – ReferencesTsutsumi, H., Yeats, R.S., and Huftile, G. H., 2001, Late Cenozoic Tectonics of the NorthernLos Angeles Fault System, California: Geological Society of America, Vol. 113, No. 4,pp. 454-468.Tsutsumi, H., and Yeats, R.S., 1999, Tectonic Setting of the 1971 Sylmar and 1994 NorthridgeEarthquakes in the San Fernando Valley, California: Seismological Society of AmericaBulletin, Vol. 89, pp. 1232-1249.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2001, Manuals for HEC-RAS, Version 3.0, CPD-86, datedJanuary 2001.U.S. Geological Survey, 1986, Earthquake Hazards in Southern California: Proceedings ofXXXII Conference: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 86-401, pp. 158-172.U.S. Geological Survey, 1997, National Hazard Maps for California / Nevada: U.S. GeologicalSurvey Open-File Report 97-130; (for additional information refer tohttp://geohazards.cr.usgs.gov/eq/html/canvmap.html).U.S. Geological Survey, 2000, Landslide Hazards, USGS Fact Sheet FS-071-00, available athttp://greenwood.cr.usgs.gov/pub/fact-sheets.fs-071-00.U.S. Geological Survey, 2001a, http://landslides.usgs.gov/index.htmlUS. Geological Survey, 2001b, http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/shake/ca/Verdugo Fire Communications Center, 2000, Annual Report.Verdugo Fire Communications Center, 2002, Annual Report.Waananen, A.O., 1969, Floods of January and February 1969 in Central and SouthernCalifornia: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 233p.Wald, D.J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T.H., and Kanamori, H., 1999, Relationships between PeakGround Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity inCalifornia: Earthquake Spectra, the Professional Journal of the Earthquake EngineeringResearch Institute (EERI), Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 557-564.Walls, C., Rockwell, T., Mueller, K., Bock, Y., Williams, S., Pfanner, J., and Fang, P., 1998,Escape Tectonics in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Region and Implications for SeismicRisk: Nature, Vol. 394, pp. 356-360.Weaver, K.D., and Dolan, J.F., 2000, Paleoseismology and Geomorphology of the RaymondFault, Los Angeles County, California: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,Vol. 90, No. 6, pp. 1409-1429.Weber, F.H., Treiman, J.A., Tan, S.S., and Miller, R.V., 1979, Landslides in the Los AngelesRegion, California: Effects of the February-March 1978 Rains, California Division ofMines and Geology Open-File Report 79-4, 277p., 1 plate.Weber, Jr., F.H., 1980a, Chapter D: Geology and Subsurface Features Related to Character andRecency of Movement Along Faults, North-Central Los Angeles Area, Los AngelesCounty, California – A Preliminary Report; in Hill, R..L., and others, EarthquakeHazards Associated with Faults in the Greater Los Angeles Area, Los Angeles County,California, Including Faults in the Santa Monica-Raymond, Verdugo-Eagle Rock, and2006 PAGE I - 13
Page 2 and 3:
City CouncilDave Weaver, MayorRafi
Page 4 and 5:
Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Table 4-2: STAPLEE Ranking of Actio
Page 58 and 59:
Table 4-4: Description of Ranking C
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Sec
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255: Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity
Page 318 and 319: NOTES:This map is intended for gene
Page 325: NOTES:This map is intended for gene
Page 329 and 330: NOTES:This map is intended for gene
Page 332 and 333: City of GlendaleUpdateHazard Mitiga
Page 334 and 335: Similar to Safety ElementIncludesEa
Page 336 and 337: HospitalsPartnershipsWithin City an
Page 338 and 339: Impact on CityMost significant area
show all

Glendale (PDF) - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?