Glendale (PDF) - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity of Glendale, CaliforniaAppendix I – ReferencesReneau, S.L., and Dietrich, W.E., 1987, The Importance of Hollows in Debris Flow Studies;Examples from Marin County, California; in Costa, J.E. and Wieczorek, G.F. (editors),Debris Flows/Avalanches: Process, Recognition, and Mitigation: Geological Society ofAmerica Reviews in Engineering Geology, Vol. VII, pp. 165-179.Richardson, E.V., Harrison, L.J., Richardson, J.R., and Davis, S.R., 1993, Evaluating scour atbridges (2d ed.): U.S. Department of Transportation Hydraulic Engineering Circular 18,132p.Richter, Charles. F., 1958, Elementary Seismology, W. H., Freeman, San Francisco.Rockwell, Thomas K., 2002, Personal Communication, on the recency of activity and style offaulting of the Hollywood, Raymond and Verdugo faults.Rodgers, J.D., Herber, L.J., Hibner, T.H., 1992, Paleolandslides in San Antonio Canyon, EasternSan Gabriel Mountains, California; in Pipkin, B.W. and Proctor, R.J. (editors),Engineering Geology Practice in Southern California: Association of EngineeringGeologists Special Publication No. 4, pp. 579-594.Rogers, A. M., Tinsely, J. C., and Borcherdt, R. D., 1985, Predicting Relative Ground Response;in Ziony (editor), Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region, An EarthScience Perspective: U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1360, pp. 221-248.Roth R., Holtom, R., and Sai-on S., 1986, California Earthquake Zoning and Probable MaximumLoss Evaluation Program, California Administrative Code Title 10, Chapter 5,Subchapter 3, Section 2307: California Department of Insurance, Los Angeles,California, 44p.R.T. Frankian & Associates, 1968, Report of Geologic and Soil Investigation, VerdugoMountains Development and Conservation Study, Glendale, California: UnpublishedConsultant Report to the City of Glendale, Job No. 6233, dated September 20, 1968.Rubin, C., and Sieh, K., 1992, Active Crustal Shortening Along the Southern Flank of theCentral Transverse Ranges, California: Southern California Earthquake Center 1992Report, Prepared for the SCEC Annual Meeting, October 6-8, 1992, Los Angeles,California.Rubin, C.M., Linvall, S., and Rockwell, T., 1998, Paleoseismic Evidence for Large SlipEarthquakes Along the Sierra Madre Fault in the Greater Los Angeles Region: Science,Vol. 281, p. 398-402.Rymer, M.J., Fumal, T.E., Schwartz, D.P., Powers, T.J., and Cinti, F.R., 1995, Distribution andRecurrence of Surface Fractures in Potrero Canyon Associated with the 1994Northridge, California, Earthquake; in Woods, M.C., and Seiple, W.R., (editors), TheNorthridge, California, Earthquake of 17 January 1994: California Division of Minesand Geology Special Publication 116, pp. 133-146.Savage, W.U., 1995, Utility Lifelines Performance in the Northridge Earthquake; in Woods,M.C., and Seiple, W.R., (editors), The Northridge Earthquake of 17 January 1994:California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 116, p. 153-162.2006 PAGE I - 10
Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity of Glendale, CaliforniaAppendix I – ReferencesScawthorn, C., 1987, Fire Following Earthquake, Estimates of the Conflagration Risk toInsured, Property in Greater Los Angeles and San Francisco: All Industry ResearchAdvisory Council, Oak Brook, Illinois, 83p.Schuster, R.L. and Highland, L.M., 2001, Socioeconomic and environmental impacts oflandslides in the Western Hemisphere: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2001-276.Sharpe, R., 1982, An Investigation of the Correlation between Earthquake Ground Motion andBuilding Performance: Applied Technology Council, U.S. Contract Survey,No. 14-08-0001-19892, 113p.Shaw, J.H., and Suppe, J., 1996, Earthquake Hazards of Active Blind-Thrust Faults Under theCentral Los Angeles Basin, California: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 101, pp.8623-8642Shaw, J.H., and Shearer, P., 1999, An Elusive Blind-Thrust Fault Beneath Metropolitan LosAngeles: Science, Vol. 283, pp. 1516-1518.Sieh, K. and Williams, P., 1990, Behavior of the southernmost San Andreas fault during the past300 years: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 95, pp. 6629-6645.Sieh, K.L., Jones, L., Hauksson, E., Hudnut, K., Eberhart-Phillips, D., Heaton, T., Hough, S.,Hutton, K., Kanamori, H., Lilje, A., Lindvall, S., McGill, S., Mori, J., Rubin, C., Spotila,J., Stock, J., Thio, H. K., Treiman, J., Wernicke, B., Zachariasen, J., 1993, Near FieldInvestigations of the Landers Earthquake Sequence, April to July, 1992: Science, Vol.260, pp. 171-176.Smith, D.P., 1986, Geology of the North Half of the Pasadena Quadrangle, Los Angeles County,California: California Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 86-4 LA, 39p., 4plates.Southern California Area Mapping Project (SCAMP), 2001, Debris Flow Occurrence Map forthe East Half of the Los Angeles 1:100,000 Quadrangle,(available at http://wrgis.wr.usgs.gov/wgmt/scamp/scamp.html).Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), 2002, Recommended Procedures forImplementation of DMG Special Publication 117 Guidelines for Analyzing andMitigating Landslide Hazards in California; by Blake, T.F., Hollingsworth, R.A., andStewart, J.P. (editors), 110p. + Appendix.Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), 2001, Southern California Faults andEarthquakes, World-Wide Web Site: www.scecdc.scec.org.Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), 1999, Recommended Procedures forImplementation of DMG Special Publication 117 Guidelines for Analyzing andMitigating Liquefaction Hazards in California, 63p.Spangle, W. E., 1988, Putting Seismic Safety Policies to Work: Prepared for the Bay AreaRegional Earthquake Preparedness Project, 39p.Spittler, T.E., Harp, E.L., Keefer, D.K., Wilson, R.C., and Sydnor, R.H., 1990, LandslideFeatures and Other Coseismic Fissures Triggered by the Loma Prieta Earthquake,Santa Cruz Mountains, California; in McNutt, S.R., and Sydnor, R.H., (editors), The2006 PAGE I - 11
Page 2 and 3:
City CouncilDave Weaver, MayorRafi
Page 4 and 5:
Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Table 4-2: STAPLEE Ranking of Actio
Page 58 and 59:
Table 4-4: Description of Ranking C
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Sec
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253: Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity
Page 318 and 319: NOTES:This map is intended for gene
Page 325: NOTES:This map is intended for gene
Page 329 and 330: NOTES:This map is intended for gene
Page 332 and 333: City of GlendaleUpdateHazard Mitiga
Page 334 and 335: Similar to Safety ElementIncludesEa
Page 336 and 337: HospitalsPartnershipsWithin City an
Page 338 and 339: Impact on CityMost significant area
show all

Glendale (PDF) - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?