Glendale (PDF) - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity of Glendale, CaliforniaSection 6 – EarthquakesSierra Madre (M7.2)VerdugoRaymondNon-Residential 1 0 0 0Commute 0 0 0 0Total 16 1 0 0Residential 4 1 0 0Non-Residential 24 2 0 0Commute 0 0 0 02PM(max educational,industrial, andcommercial) Total 28 3 0 05PM (peakcommute time)Residential 4 0 0 0Non-Residential 9 1 0 0Commute 0 0 0 0Total 13 1 0 02AM Residential 165 24 2 4(maximum Non-Residential 9 2 0 1residential Commute 0 0 0 0occupancy) Total 175 26 2 42PM Residential 43 6 1 1(max educational, Non-Residential 337 71 9 19industrial, and Commute 0 0 0 0commercial) Total 380 78 10 205PM (peakcommute time)Residential 51 7 1 1Non-Residential 122 26 3 7Commute 0 1 1 0Total 173 34 5 82AM Residential 179 27 2 5(maximum Non-Residential 11 2 1 1residential Commute 0 0 0 0occupancy) Total 189 29 3 62PM Residential 47 7 1 1(max educational, Non-Residential 378 82 11 22industrial, and Commute 0 0 0 0commercial) Total 425 89 12 235PM (peakcommute time)Residential 56 8 1 2Non-Residential 140 31 4 8Commute 1 1 1 0Total 197 40 6 102AM Residential 131 17 2 3(maximum Non-Residential 7 1 0 0residential Commute 0 0 0 0occupancy) Total 138 18 2 32PM Residential 35 5 0 1(max educational, Non-Residential 244 47 6 11industrial, and Commute 0 0 0 0commercial) Total 279 52 6 125PM (peakcommute time)Residential 42 5 0 1Non-Residential 90 17 2 4Commute 0 0 1 0Total 132 23 3 5HAZUS also estimates the damage to other critical facilities in the City, including schools, fireand police stations, and the emergency operations center. According to the model, anearthquake on the Mojave segment of the San Andreas fault is not going to damage any of theschools, fire or police stations, or the City’s emergency operations center. All of these facilitieswould be fully functional the day after the earthquake.An earthquake on the Sierra Madre fault is anticipated to cause at least moderate damage toseven schools in the City, and none of the schools and school district offices in Glendale areexpected to be more than 50 percent operational the day after the earthquake. Most of the2006 PAGE 6 - 49
Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity of Glendale, CaliforniaSection 6 – Earthquakesschools with more than 50 percent moderate damage are located in the northern portion of theCity, as illustrated in Map 6.8. The model also indicates that although none of the other criticalfacilities will experience more than slight damage, none of them would be more than fullyoperational the day after the earthquake.An earthquake on the Verdugo fault is anticipated to cause at least moderate damage to oneschool in the City – Glendale High (see Map 6.8), which according to the HAZUS inventory,also houses the Glendale Cosmetology School. The model indicates that none of the othercritical facilities in the City will experience more than slight damage, but with the exception ofone hospital, none of the critical facilities (including fire stations and the emergency operationscenter) will be more than 50 percent functional the day after the earthquake.An earthquake on the Raymond fault is expected to also damage Glendale High. Damage to theother critical facilities in the City is expected to be less severe than that caused by earthquakeson either the Sierra Madre or Verdugo faults, but few facilities are expected to be more than 50percent operational the day after the earthquake.Economic Losses - The model estimates that total building-related losses in the City ofGlendale will range from $83 million for an earthquake on the San Andreas fault, to $853million for an earthquake on the Verdugo fault. Approximately 20 percent of these estimatedlosses would be related to business interruption in the city. By far, the largest loss would besustained by the residential occupancies that make up as much as 60 percent of the total loss.Table 6-9 below provides a summary of the estimated economic losses anticipated as a result ofeach of the earthquake scenarios considered herein.ScenarioTable 6-9: Estimated Economic LossesProperty DamageBusinessInterruptionTotalSan Andreas $69.8 Million $13.5 Million $83.3 MillionSierra Madre $639.7 Million $158.2 Million $797.8 MillionVerdugo $680.4 Million $72.7 Million $853.0 MillionRaymond $560.1 Million $127.6 Million $687.7 Million2006 PAGE 6 - 50
Page 2 and 3:
City CouncilDave Weaver, MayorRafi
Page 4 and 5:
Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Table 4-2: STAPLEE Ranking of Actio
Page 58 and 59:
Table 4-4: Description of Ranking C
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63: Natural Hazards Mitigation PlanCity
Page 108 and 109: Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Sec
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
NOTES:This map is intended for gene
Page 325:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 332 and 333:
City of GlendaleUpdateHazard Mitiga
Page 334 and 335:
Similar to Safety ElementIncludesEa
Page 336 and 337:
HospitalsPartnershipsWithin City an
Page 338 and 339:
Impact on CityMost significant area
show all

Glendale (PDF) - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?