12.07.2015 Views

Boston - American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Boston - American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Boston - American Association for Thoracic Surgery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

89 TH ANNUAL MEETING MAY 9–MAY 13, 2009BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTSRESULTS: The mortality <strong>for</strong> reoperative AVR patients significantly decreased overtime (I: 15% [6/39], II: 15% [8/53], III: 2% [2/99], p = 0.005) and was equivalent toprimary AVR in the current era (3.5% [19/542] vs. 2.0% [2/99], p = 0.65). Majorcomplication rates also significantly decreased over time in reoperative AVRpatients (I: 15% [6/39], II: 17% [9/53], III: 5% [5/99], p = 0.04) and was similar topatients undergoing primary AVR (12% [23/191] vs. 15% [215/1412], p = 0.30) in thecurrent era. Importantly, patients had more comorbidities including dyslipidemia(26% [10/39], 42% [22/53], 77% [76/99], P < 0.0001), coronary artery disease(31% [12/39], 49% [26/53], 84% [83/99], P < 0.0001) and hypertension (39% [15/39], 53% [28/53], 69% [68/99], P = 0.003) over time while other preoperative riskfactors were similar. In reoperative AVR patients, there were no differences in outcomebased on primary operation. Specifically, mortality at reoperation was similarfollowing primary CABG + AVR (19% [3/16]), CABG (6% [5/88]) and AVR (9%[6/70], p = 0.18). Major complication rates were also not dependent on primaryoperation (CABG + AVR: 25% [4/16], CABG: 15% [13/88], and AVR: 9% [6/70],p = 0.21).CONCLUSION: Reoperative AVR now carries similar morbidity and mortality asprimary AVR. The risk of reoperation is not affected by the primary operation.82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!