12.07.2015 Views

Boston - American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Boston - American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Boston - American Association for Thoracic Surgery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

89 TH ANNUAL MEETING MAY 9–MAY 13, 2009BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS51. Twenty Three Years of One-stage End-to-Side Anastomosis Repairof Interrupted Aortic ArchesYves d’Udekem, 1 Aisyah S. Hussin, 1 Ajay J. Iyengar, 1 Igor E. Konstantinov, 1Suzan M. Donath, 1 Gavin R. Wheaton, 2 Andrew M. Bullock, 3 Leeanne E. Grigg, 4Bryn O. Jones, 1 Christian P. Brizard 11. Cardiac <strong>Surgery</strong>, Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;2. Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia; 3. Princess MargaretHospital, Perth, WA, Australia; 4. Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne,VIC, AustraliaInvited Discussant: V. Mohan ReddyOBJECTIVE: To define the long-term results of a policy of one-stage repair ofinterrupted aortic arches with end-to-side (ETS) anastomosis.METHODS: Records of all pts undergoing interrupted aortic arch repair after theintroduction of the ETS technique were reviewed. From 1985 to 2007, 113 pts (60 males)were operated at a median of 6 days (1 d–2 y). Interruption was type A in 37 pts(33%), type B in 73 (64%), and type C in 3 (3%). Associated conditions were VSD(86), truncus (13), DORV (8), AP window (4), single ventricle (13). Subaortic stenosiswas suspected in 36 pts (31%). Fifty-five pts (49%) required ventilation and 33(30%) inotropic support prior surgery. One-stage repair was per<strong>for</strong>med in 100 pts(89%), 93 having ETS repair. Be<strong>for</strong>e 2000, one-stage repair was per<strong>for</strong>med underdeep hypothermic circulatory arrest, and thereafter with moderate hypothermiaand selective cerebral perfusion.RESULTS: There were 12 hospital deaths (11%). The only predictive factor of hospitalmortality was repair different than ETS (25% (5/20) vs 8% (7/93); p < 0.05).Twelve pts needed arch reintervention during the same hospital stay: 8 <strong>for</strong> residualarch obstruction (5 ETS), and 4 <strong>for</strong> left main bronchus obstruction (3 ETS).Nine pts were lost to follow-up. After a mean of 10 ± 7 years, there were 6 latedeaths <strong>for</strong> a 18 year survival of 94% (95% CI: 84–97%). Pts operated with ETS hadbetter chances of survival (18 year survival 95% (95% CI: 86–98%) vs 77% (95%CI: 44–92%). By multivariate analysis the only predictive factor of late mortalitywas post-operative occurrence of left main bronchus compression (p < 0.005). Followinghospital discharge, 18 pts had to undergo further aortic arch interventionby surgery (5), catheter intervention (7), or both (3). The only factor predictive ofearly or late arch reintervention was initial procedure per<strong>for</strong>med through thoracotomy(p = 0.001). Freedom from arch reintervention after ETS repair was 75% at 18years (95% CI: 56–87%). On echocardiography, an additional 16 pts were identifiedto have a residual gradient higher than 25 mm Hg. The 18 year freedom fromhypertension was 88% (95% CI: 72–95%).190

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!