Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom•: the argument seems to require this; besides, in the statement of the difficulty, Abraham’s having•: the common editions follow mss.•: this is probably to be understood: as if he had said, He lays down a second point of differencethat, &c.•: to which, so to say, life was restored.•: where the LXX. has,•: which was that of Mutianus.•:•;•; Mutianus,•; The Catena has•; and so in the other passage which St. Chrys. cites (•; and the later translator•; and this verse itself runs,•; as•; but only a renewal of fertilizing action which had been previously suspended.•; but presently St. Chrys. substitutes for this,•; but the reference is to our sinning•; is also said by St. Chrys. Hom. on 1 Cor. i. 4•; it is in this clause opposed to•; not as the English version might lead us to understand it, of the•; or•; or,•; probably the destruction of the Egyptians and the Amorites, &c.,•; probably used by St. Chrys. as if•; reads•; see•; seem more appropriate to Nehemiah than to Ezra: and the reception of Nehemiah on his secondvisit to Jerusalem may have been the circumstance of which the orator was thinking.•; so•; so also Sav. and Ben.•; so the common text of the New Test. read•; the common texts read•; they omit the clause next following.•; which Mutianus read, translating it,•; which is the reading of the common texts of the N.T.•=•?•A catena, the Verona editions, and perhaps one ms.•A dear-bought dower870