Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom•. Dr. Heyse conjectures•. Dunæus suggested•. E.V.•. E.V. prayed: Ben and ms.•. For•. For instances of this meaning of the word, see Mr. Field’s annot.•. G. T.•. G. T. and Ben.•. G. T.].•. He combines these two texts (either from confusing them or by way of explanation) in threeother places. See Mr. Fields’ note. The words were addressed to Cain before he killed his brother.•. If this be the right reading, the sense is, that the Father and the Son are more Equal in honorthan human father and son. Sav. reads•. In G. T. the words are:•. In the original it is one and the same word which in the text,•. It cannot be denied that the word in the classics bears both the closely related meanings ofinaugurate•. It is not clear, as Mr. Field remarks, to what the articles•. It seems as if the hearers were showing themselves surprised at the severity of what he wassaying.•. It will be observed that St. Chrys. dwells much on this word: and also that he understands the•. Lit. to bring or bear up: hence to refer to or bring before a person, to present. The word is usedin the Epistle to the Hebrews for•. Literally,•. Meaning, perhaps,•. Montfaucon conjectured•. Mr. F. observes that St. Chrys. more usually cites the text without•. Mr. Field adopts the reading of the later mss.•. Mr. Field many years ago in earlier volumes of his edition, suggested the true reading here, asalso the word•. Mr. Field retains•. Mr. Field says that he has•. Mr. Field seems to think that the Expositor read•. Mr. Field thinks the passage may be corrupt; the parenthetic words seem added to explain thatit is the Christian ordinances•. Mr. Field with hesitation adopts here the reading of the Catena•. Mut. and one ms.•. On this third heresy respecting the Holy Trinity, see St. Greg. Naz. Orat•. One ms.•. Otherwise we must supply•. Perhaps the difficulty is avoided by supposing that the word864