12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>mBut what he says is this: if <strong>the</strong>y, having “refused Him” when He gave laws “<strong>on</strong> earth, did notescape,” how shall we refuse Him, when He gives laws from Heaven? He declares here not thatHe is ano<strong>the</strong>r; far from it. He does not set forth One <strong>and</strong> Ano<strong>the</strong>r, but He appears terrible, whenuttering His Voice “from Heaven.” 3444 It is He Himself <strong>the</strong>n, both <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>e <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r: but <strong>the</strong>One is terrible. For he expresses not a difference <strong>of</strong> Pers<strong>on</strong>s but <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gift. Whence does this appear?“For if <strong>the</strong>y escaped not,” he says, “who refused Him that spake <strong>on</strong> earth, much more shall not weescape, if we turn away from Him that speaketh from heaven.” What <strong>the</strong>n? Is this <strong>on</strong>e differentfrom <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r? How <strong>the</strong>n does he say, “whose voice <strong>the</strong>n shook <strong>the</strong> earth”? For it was <strong>the</strong> “voice”<strong>of</strong> Him who “<strong>the</strong>n” gave <strong>the</strong> Law, which “shook <strong>the</strong> earth. But now hath He promised, saying, Yet<strong>on</strong>ce more I shake not <strong>the</strong> earth <strong>on</strong>ly, but also heaven. And this word Yet <strong>on</strong>ce more, signifieth <strong>the</strong>removing <strong>of</strong> those things which are shaken, as <strong>of</strong> things that are made.” All things <strong>the</strong>refore willbe taken away, <strong>and</strong> will be compacted anew for <strong>the</strong> better. For this is what he suggests here. Why<strong>the</strong>n dost thou grieve when thou sufferest in a world that abideth not; when thou art afflicted in aworld which will very shortly have passed away? If our rest were [<strong>to</strong> be] in <strong>the</strong> latter period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>world, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>on</strong>e ought <strong>to</strong> be afflicted in looking <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> end.“That” (he says) “those which cannot be shaken may remain.” But <strong>of</strong> what sort are “those thingswhich cannot be shaken”? The things <strong>to</strong> come.[6.] Let us <strong>the</strong>n do all for this, that we may attain that [rest], that we may enjoy those goodthings. Yea, I pray <strong>and</strong> beseech you, let us be earnest for this. No <strong>on</strong>e builds in a city which is going<strong>to</strong> fall down. Tell me, I pray you, if any <strong>on</strong>e said that after a year, this city would fall, but such acity not at all, wouldest thou have built in that which was about <strong>to</strong> fall? So I also now say this, Letus not build in this world; it will fall after a little, <strong>and</strong> all will be destroyed. But why do I say, Itwill fall? Before its fall we shall be destroyed, <strong>and</strong> suffer what is fearful; we shall be removed from<strong>the</strong>m.Why build we up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> s<strong>and</strong>? Let us build up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock: for whatsoever may happen, thatbuilding remains impregnable, nothing will be able <strong>to</strong> destroy it. With good reas<strong>on</strong>. For <strong>to</strong> all suchattacks that regi<strong>on</strong> is inaccessible, just as this is accessible. For earthquakes, <strong>and</strong> fires, <strong>and</strong> inroad<strong>of</strong> enemies, take it away from us even while we are alive: <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>tentimes destroy us with it.And even in case it remains, disease speedily removes us, or if we stay, suffers us not <strong>to</strong> enjoyit fairly. For what pleasure [is <strong>the</strong>re], where <strong>the</strong>re are sicknesses, <strong>and</strong> false accusati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> envy,<strong>and</strong> intrigues? Or should <strong>the</strong>re be n<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se things, yet <strong>of</strong>tentimes if we have no children, weare disquieted, we are impatient, not having any <strong>to</strong> whom we may leave houses <strong>and</strong> all o<strong>the</strong>r things;<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>nceforward we pine away as laboring for o<strong>the</strong>rs. Yea <strong>of</strong>tentimes <strong>to</strong>o <strong>the</strong> inheritance passesaway <strong>to</strong> our enemies, not <strong>on</strong>ly after we are g<strong>on</strong>e, but even while we live. What is more miserable<strong>the</strong>n than <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>il for enemies, <strong>and</strong> ourselves <strong>to</strong> be ga<strong>the</strong>ring sins <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r in order that <strong>the</strong>y mayhave rest? And many are <strong>the</strong> instances <strong>of</strong> this that are seen in our cities. And yet [I say no more]lest I should grieve those who have been despoiled. For I could have menti<strong>on</strong>ed some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m evenby name, <strong>and</strong> have had many his<strong>to</strong>ries <strong>to</strong> tell, <strong>and</strong> many houses <strong>to</strong> show you, which have receivedfor masters <strong>the</strong> enemies <strong>of</strong> those who labored for <strong>the</strong>m: nay not houses <strong>on</strong>ly, but slaves also <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> whole inheritance have <strong>of</strong>tentimes come round <strong>to</strong> enemies. For such are things human.But in Heaven <strong>the</strong>re is nothing <strong>of</strong> this <strong>to</strong> fear,—lest after a man is dead, his enemy should come,<strong>and</strong> succeed <strong>to</strong> his inheritance. For <strong>the</strong>re <strong>the</strong>re is nei<strong>the</strong>r death nor enmity; <strong>the</strong> tabernacles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>3444Comp. <strong>St</strong>. Iren. pp. 330, 338, 403, O.T.742

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!